Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 413–417 | Cite as

Human remains found in two wells: a forensic entomology perspective

Case Report

Abstract

When estimating the time since death or manner of death, the identification and the pathological evaluations of a body are generally impeded by post mortem changes. Research and case studies help experts to achieve a more accurate diagnosis, but at present there is scant literature covering topics concerning forensic science and decompositional processes in aquatic environments. The two case studies presented each involve a decomposed body found in a unique aquatic environment; namely wells containing ground water. In Case 1 an entomologist attended the scene and in Case 2 an entomologist was only involved after 20 months when it was decided that the insect evidence collected at the second autopsy may be useful in determining a time frame. The first case highlights the problems associated with body retrieval from aquatic environments as the body was removed it dismembered. Fortunately, the well was able to be drained, so much of the insect evidence was retrieved. In the second case the body was found dismembered but the entomological evidence was overlooked and lost. During the second autopsy insects were found, collected, and sent to an entomologist to help clarify the post mortem interval.

References

  1. 1.
    Haglund WD, Sorg MH. Forensic taphonomy: the post mortem fate of human remains. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Byrd H, Castner JL. Forensic entomology—the utility of arthropods in legal investigation. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amendt J, Goff ML, Campobasso CP, Grassberger M. Current concepts in forensic entomology. New York: Springer; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kelley TB, Nute HD, Zinszer MA, Fuelner M, Stanton G, Charlton W Jr, Hess J, Johnson TR, McDonald K. Underwater crime scene investigation: a guide for law enforcement. Florida: Best Publishing Company; 2008.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stewart G. Underwater forensics. Detroit, MI: Lucent Books; 2010.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Merritt RW, Wallace JR. The role of aquatic insects in forensic investigations. In: Byrd JH, Castner JL, editors. Forensic entomology—the utility of arthropods in legal investigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2010. p. 271–319.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haskell NH, McShaffery DG, Hawley DA, Williams RE, Pless JE. Use of aquatic insects in determining submersion interval. J Forensic Sci. 1989;34(3):622–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson GS. Decomposition and invertebrate colonization of cadavers in coastal marine environments. In: Amendt J, Goff ML, Campobasso CP, Grassberger M, editors. Current concepts in forensic entomology. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 223–72.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forbes SL, Dent BB, Stuart BH. The effect of soil type on adipocere formation. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;154(1):35–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Takatori T. Investigations on the mechanism of adipocere formation and its relation to other biochemical reactions. Forensic Sci Int. 1996;80(1–2):49–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dickson GC, Poulter RTM, Maas EW, Probert PK, Kieser JA. Marine bacterial succession as a potential indicator of post-mortem submersion level. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;209(1–3):1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mann RW, Bass WM, Meadows L. Time since death and decomposition of the human body: variables and observations in case and experimental field studies. J Forensic Sci. 1990;35:103–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baccino E, Cattaneo C, Jouineau C, Poudoulec J, Martrille L. Cooling rates of the ear and brain in pig heads submerged in water: implications for postmortem interval estimation of cadavers found in still water. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2007;28(1):80–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hobischak NR. Freshwater invertebrate succession and decompositional studies on carrion in British Columbia. Thesis (M.P.M.). Simon Fraser University; 1997.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Payne JA, King EW. Insect succession and decomposition of pig carcasses in water. J Ga Entomol Soc. 1972;7(3):153–62.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith KVG. A manual of forensic entomology. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History) and Cornell University Press; 1986.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Magni P, Costantini G, Jourdan S. First forensic entomology studies in Piedmont area. Proceedings of the 4th meeting of European association for forensic entomology. Bari (Italy); 26–29 April 2006. p. 78.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Magni P, Massimelli M, Messina R, Mazzucco P, Di Luise E. Entomologia Forense—Gli insetti nelle indagini giudiziarie e medico-legali. Torino: Minerva Medica; 2008.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wooldrige J, Scarse L, Wall R. Flight activity of the blowflies, Calliphora vomitoria and Lucilia sericata, in the dark. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;172:94–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grassberger M, Friedrich E, Reiter C. The blowfly Chrysomya albiceps (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) as a new forensic indicator in central Europe. Int J Legal Med. 2003;117:75–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laurence BR. Geographical expansion of the range of Chrysomya blowflies. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1981;75:130–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Del Bianco Faria L, Orsi L, Trinca LA, Godoy WAC. Larval predation by Chrysomya albiceps on Cochliomyia macellaria, Chrysomya megacephala and Chrysomya putoria. Entomol Exp Appl. 1999;90:149–55.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Patitucci LD, Mulieri PR, Oliva A, Mariluis JC. Status of the forensically important genus Ophyra (Diptera: Muscidae) in Argentina. Rev Soc Entomol Argent. 2010;69(1–2):91–9.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Skidmore P. The biology of the Muscidae of the world. Series Ent. 1985;29:1–550.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Carvalho CJBD, Mello-Patiu CAD. Key to the adults of the most common forensic species of Diptera in South America. Rev Bras Entomol. 2008;52(3):309–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Byrd JH, Castner JL. Insects of forensic importance. In: Byrd JH, Castner JL, editors. Forensic entomology—the utility of arthropods in legal investigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2010. p. 39–126.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Speight MCD. Species accounts of European Syrphidae (Diptera), Glasgow 2011. Syrph the Net, the database of European Syrphidae. Vol. 65. Syrph the Net publications; 2011.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pérez-Bañón C. Marcos García MA. Description of the immature stages of Syritta flaviventris (Diptera: Syrphidae) and new data about the life history of European species of Syritta on Opuntia maxima. Eur J Entomol. 2000;97:131–6.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Becker RF. Underwater forensic investigation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paola A. Magni
    • 1
  • Matteo Borrini
    • 2
  • Ian R. Dadour
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Forensic ScienceUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.Post Graduate Specialization School of Archeological HeritageUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations