Advertisement

Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 203–207 | Cite as

Disaster victim identification

  • Eleanor A. M. Graham
DNA Reviews

Abstract

In the event of any mass fatality incident, despite the cause, disaster victim identification must be undertaken; the humanitarian and legal responsibility for this falls on the forensic community. Mass fatality incidents can be natural (e.g., tsunamis, earthquakes, hurricanes), accidental (e.g., building collapse, ship sinking) or can occur as a result of a terrorist attack. Terrorism alone has been responsible for thousands of deaths in recent years and can be encountered in many forms (e.g., suicide bombings, airplane hijackings). In mass fatality situations, the experitise of many specialities are called on to assist in the identification efforts and to allow for the speedy return of recovered human remains to the relatives of the deceased. Today, DNA plays a vital but never solitary role in disaster victim identification.

Key Words

Forensic pathology disaster victim identification DNA mass fatality incident decomposition fragmentation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith A. Disaster victim identification of military aircrew, 1945–2002. Aviat Space Environ Med 2003;74:1198–1200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corach D, Sala A, Penacino G, Sotelo A. Mass disasters: rapid molecular screening of human remains by means of short tandem repeats typing. Electrophoresis 1995;16:1617–1623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clayton TM, Whitaker JP, Maguire CN. Identification of bodies from the scene of a mass disaster using DNA amplification of short tandem repeat (STR) loci. Forensic Sci Int 1995;76:7–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clayton TM, Whitaker JP, Fisher DL, et al. Further validation of a quadraplex STR DNA typing system: a collaborative effort to identify victims of a mass disaster. Forensic Sci Int 1995;76:17–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Whitaker JP, Clayton TM, Urquhart AJ, et al. Short tandem repeat typing of bodies from a mass disaster: high success rate and characteristic amplification patterns in highly degraded samples. Biotechniques 1995;18:670–677.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leclair B, Scholl T. Application of automation and information systems to forensic genetic specimen processing. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2005;5:241–250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Olaisen B, Stenersen M, Mevag B. Identification by DNA analysis of the victims of the August 1996 Spitsbergen civil aircraft disaster. Nat Genet 1997;15:402–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Esslinger KJ, Siegel JA, Spillane H, Stallworth S. Using STR analysis to detect human DNA from exploded pipe bomb devices. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:481–484.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gill P, Ivanov PL, Kimpton C et al. Identification of the remains of the Romanov family by DNA analysis. Nat Genet 1994;6:130–135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hagelberg E, Gray IC, Jeffreys AJ. Identification of the skeletal remains of a murder victim by DNA analysis. Nature 1991;352:427–429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Budimlija ZM, Prinz MK, Zelson-Mundorff A, et al. World Trace Center human identification project: experiences with individual body identification cases. Croat Med J 2003;44:259–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Biesecker LG, Bailey-Wilson JE, Ballantyne J, et al. Epidemiology, DNA identifications after the 9/11 World Trade Center attack. Science 2005;310:1122, 1123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chung DT, Drabek J, Opel KL, Butler JM, McCord BR. A study on the effects of degradation and template concentration on the amplification efficiency of the STR Miniplex primer sets. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:733–740.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Butler JM, Shen Y, McCord BR. The development of reduced size STR amplicons as tools for analysis of degraded DNA. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:1054–1064.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coble MD, Butler JM. Characterization of new miniSTR loci to aid analysis of degraded DNA. J Forensic Sci 2005;50:43–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Graham EAM Mini STR's. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2005;1:65–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ladika S. South Asia tsunami. DNA helps identify missing in the tsunami zone. Science 2005;307:504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dixon LA, Murray CM, Archer EJ, Dobbins AE, Koumi P, Gill P. Validation of a 21-locus autosomal SNP multiplex for forensic identification purposes. Forensic Sci Int 2005;154:62–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Graham EAM. Lab-on-a-chip technology. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2005;1:221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ludes B, Tracqui A, Pfitzinger H, et al. Medico-legal investigations of the Airbus, A320 crash upon Mount Ste-Odile, France. J Forensic Sci 1994;39:1147–1152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kahana T, Freund M, Hiss J. Suicidal terrorist bombings in Israel—identification of human remains. J Forensic Sci 1997;42:260–264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goodwin W, Linacre A, Vanezis P. The use of mitochondrial DNA and short tandem repeat typing in the identification of air crash victims. Electrophoresis 1999;20:1707–1711.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hsu CM, Huang NE, Tsai LC, et al. Identification of victims of the 1998 Taoyuan Airbus crash accident using DNA analysis. Int J Legal Med 1999;113:43–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leclair B, Fregeau CJ, Bowen KL, Fourney RM. Enhanced kinship analysis and STR-based DNA typing for human identification in mass fatality incidents: the Swiss air flight 111 disaster. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:939–953.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Campobasso CP, Falamingo R, Vinci F. Investigation of Italy's deadliest building collapse: forensic aspects of a mass disaster. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:635–639.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mukaida M, Kimura H, Takada Y, Masuda T, Nakata Y. The personal identification of many samples recovered from under the sea. Forensic Sci Int 2000;113:79–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meyer HJ. The Kaprun cable carfire disaster—aspects of forensic organisation following a mass fatality with 155 victims. Forensic Sci Int 2003;138:1–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alonso A, Martin P, Albarram C, et al. Challenges of DNA profiling in mass disaster investigations. Croat Med J 2005;46:540–548.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forensic Pathology UnitUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations