A Robust Reduced Rank Graph Regression Method for Neuroimaging Genetic Analysis
To characterize associations between genetic and neuroimaging data, a variety of analytic methods have been proposed in neuroimaging genetic studies. These methods have achieved promising performance by taking into account inherent correlation in either the neuroimaging data or the genetic data alone. In this study, we propose a novel robust reduced rank graph regression based method in a linear regression framework by considering correlations inherent in neuroimaging data and genetic data jointly. Particularly, we model the association analysis problem in a reduced rank regression framework with the genetic data as a feature matrix and the neuroimaging data as a response matrix by jointly considering correlations among the neuroimaging data as well as correlations between the genetic data and the neuroimaging data. A new graph representation of genetic data is adopted to exploit their inherent correlations, in addition to robust loss functions for both the regression and the data representation tasks, and a square-root-operator applied to the robust loss functions for achieving adaptive sample weighting. The resulting optimization problem is solved using an iterative optimization method whose convergence has been theoretically proved. Experimental results on the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset have demonstrated that our method could achieve competitive performance in terms of regression performance between brain structural measures and the Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), compared with state-of-the-art alternative methods.
KeywordsImage-genetic analysis Variable selection Sparse learning Graph representation
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants [EB022573, CA223358, DK114786, DA039215, and DA039002].
- Argyriou, A., Evgeniou, T., & Pontil, M. (2007). Multi-task feature learning. In B. Schölkopf, J. Platt, & T. Hoffman (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 19, pp. 41–48). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Chen, L. H., Kao, P. Y. P., Fan, Y. H., Ho, D. T. Y., Chan, C. S. Y., Yik, P. Y., Ha, J. C. T., Chu, L. W., & Song, Y.-Q. (2012). Polymorphisms of CR1, CLU and PICALM confer susceptibility of Alzheimer's disease in a southern Chinese population. Neurobiol Aging, 33(1), 210 e211–210. e217., 210.e1, 210.e7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corder, E., Saunders, A., Strittmatter, W., Schmechel, D., Gaskell, P., Small, G. a., Roses, A., Haines, J., & Pericak-Vance, M. A. (1993). Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science, 261(5123), 921–923.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Du, L., Liu, K., Zhang, T., Yao, X., Yan, J., Risacher, S. L., Han, J., Guo, L., Saykin, A. J., & Shen, L. (2017). A novel SCCA approach via truncated ℓ1-norm and truncated group lasso for brain imaging genetics. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx594.
- Fallin, D., Cohen, A., Essioux, L., Chumakov, I., Blumenfeld, M., Cohen, D., & Schork, N. J. (2001). Genetic analysis of case/control data using estimated haplotype frequencies: Application to APOE locus variation and Alzheimer's disease. Genome Res, 11(1), 143–151.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hao, X. K., Yao, X. H., Yan, J. W., Risacher, S. L., Saykin, A. J., Zhang, D. Q., Shen, L., & Neuroimaging, A. s. D. (2016). Identifying multimodal intermediate phenotypes between genetic risk factors and disease status in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroinformatics, 14(4), 439–452.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Harold, D., Abraham, R., Hollingworth, P., Sims, R., Gerrish, A., Hamshere, M. L., Pahwa, J. S., Moskvina, V., Dowzell, K., & Williams, A. (2009). Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and PICALM associated with Alzheimer's disease. Nature Genetics, 41(10), 1088–1093.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- He, X., Cai, D., & Niyogi, P. (2006). Laplacian score for feature selection. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 18, 507–514.Google Scholar
- Jack, C. R., Bernstein, M. A., Fox, N. C., Thompson, P., Alexander, G., Harvey, D., Borowski, B., Britson, P. J., Whitwell, J. L., & Ward, C. (2008). The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 27(4), 685–691.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu, L., J. J. Wang and Y. Fan (2014). Morphological and functional changes in the developing brain during childhood and Adolescence OHBM Annual Meeting. Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
- Peng, H., & Fan, Y. (2016). Direct sparsity optimization based feature selection for multi-class classification. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1918–1924. New York: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
- Peng, H. and Y. Fan (2017b). A general framework for sparsity regularized feature selection via iteratively reweighted Least Square minimization. AAAI.Google Scholar
- Reitz, C. (2012). Alzheimer’s disease and the amyloid cascade hypothesis: a critical review. International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/369808.
- Reitz, C., Tokuhiro, S., Clark, L. N., Conrad, C., Vonsattel, J. P., Hazrati, L. N., Palotás, A., Lantigua, R., Medrano, M., & Jiménez-Velázquez, I. Z. (2011b). SORCS1 alters amyloid precursor protein processing and variants may increase Alzheimer's disease risk. Annals of Neurology, 69(1), 47–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Schuff, N., N. Woerner, L. Boreta, T. Kornfield, L. Shaw, J. Trojanowski, P. Thompson, C. Jack Jr, M. Weiner, Alzheimer's and D. N. Initiative (2009). "MRI of hippocampal volume loss in early Alzheimer's disease in relation to ApoE genotype and biomarkers." Brain 132(4): 1067–1077.Google Scholar
- Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., & Joliot, M. (2002). Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage, 15(1), 273–289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vounou, M., Janousova, E., Wolz, R., Stein, J. L., Thompson, P. M., Rueckert, D., Montana, G., & Initia, A. D. N. (2012). Sparse reduced-rank regression detects genetic associations with voxel-wise longitudinal phenotypes in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage, 60(1), 700–716.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang, H., Nie, F., Huang, H., Risacher, S. L., Saykin, A. J., Shen, L., & Alzheimer's Dis Neuroimaging, I. (2012a). Identifying disease sensitive and quantitative trait-relevant biomarkers from multidimensional heterogeneous imaging genetics data via sparse multimodal multitask learning. Bioinformatics, 28(12), I127–I136.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang, H., Nie, F. P., Huang, H., Yan, J. W., Kim, S., Nho, K., Risacher, S. L., Saykin, A. J., Shen, L., & Initi, A. s. D. N. (2012b). From phenotype to genotype: An association study of longitudinal phenotypic markers to Alzheimer's disease relevant SNPs. Bioinformatics, 28(18), I619–I625.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Zheng, W., Zhu, X., Zhu, Y., Hu, R., & Lei, C. (2017). Dynamic graph learning for spectral feature selection. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1–17.Google Scholar
- Zhu, X., Suk, H. I., Huang, H., & Shen, D. (2017b). Low-rank graph-regularized structured sparse regression for identifying genetic biomarkers. IEEE Transactions on Big Data PP(99), 1–1.Google Scholar