Advertisement

Neuroinformatics

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 113–134 | Cite as

iqr: A Tool for the Construction of Multi-level Simulations of Brain and Behaviour

  • Ulysses Bernardet
  • Paul F. M. J. Verschure
Article

Abstract

The brain is the most complex system we know of. Despite the wealth of data available in neuroscience, our understanding of this system is still very limited. Here we argue that an essential component in our arsenal of methods to advance our understanding of the brain is the construction of artificial brain-like systems. In this way we can encompass the multi-level organisation of the brain and its role in the context of the complete embodied real-world and real-time perceiving and behaving system. Hence, on the one hand, we must be able to develop and validate theories of brains as closing the loop between perception and action, and on the other hand as interacting with the real world. Evidence is growing that one of the sources of the computational power of neuronal systems lies in the massive and specific connectivity, rather than the complexity of single elements. To meet these challenges—multiple levels of organisation, sophisticated connectivity, and the interaction of neuronal models with the real-world—we have developed a multi-level neuronal simulation environment, iqr. This framework deals with these requirements by directly transforming them into the core elements of the simulation environment itself. iqr provides a means to design complex neuronal models graphically, and to visualise and analyse their properties on-line. In iqr connectivity is defined in a flexible, yet compact way, and simulations run at a high speed, which allows the control of real-world devices—robots in the broader sense—in real-time. The architecture of iqr is modular, providing the possibility to write new neuron, and synapse types, and custom interfaces to other hardware systems. The code of iqr is publicly accessible under the GNU General Public License (GPL). iqr has been in use since 1996 and has been the core tool for a large number of studies ranging from detailed models of neuronal systems like the cerebral cortex, and the cerebellum, to robot based models of perception, cognition and action to large-scale real-world systems. In addition, iqr has been widely used over many years to introduce students to neuronal simulation and neuromorphic control. In this paper we outline the conceptual and methodological background of iqr and its design philosophy. Thereafter we present iqr’s main features and computational properties. Finally, we describe a number of projects using iqr, singling out how iqr is used for building a “synthetic insect”.

Keywords

Neuronal simulation Multi-level Large-scale Synthetic epistemology Bio-robotics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Mark Blanchard, Reto Wyss and Miguel Lechón for their contributions to the development of iqr. Important contributions to the neuronal architecture of “synthetic insect” system come from Sergi Bermúdez i Badia. The electronics used in this project was designed and build by Pawel Pyk. The development of iqr was supported by the Synthetic Forager (FP7-ICT-217148-SF) project.

References

  1. Amari, S., Beltrame, F., Bjaalie, J. G., Dalkara, T., Schutter, E. D., Egan, G. F., et al. (2003). Neuroscience data and tool sharing: A legal and policy framework for neuroinformatics. Neuroinformatics Journal, 1, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bermúdez i Badia, S., Bernardet, U., Guanella, A., Pyk, P., KnÃijsel, P., & Verschure, P. (2007a). A biologically based chemo-sensing uav for humanitarian demining. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 4(2), 187–198.Google Scholar
  3. Bermúdez i Badia, S., Pyk, P., & Verschure, P. (2007b). A fly-locust based neuronal control system applied to an unmanned aerial vehicle: The invertebrate neuronal principles for course stabilization, altitude control and collision avoidance. International Journal of Robotics Research, 26(7), 759–772. doi: 10.1177/0278364907080253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bermúdez i Badia, S., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2004). A collision avoidance model based on the lobula giant movement detector neuron of the locust. In J. V. Campenhout (Ed.), Proceedings of the international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN’04), Budapest, Hungary (p. 1757).Google Scholar
  5. Baernstein, H., & Hull, C. (1931). A mechanical model of the conditioned reflex. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 99–106.Google Scholar
  6. Bernardet, U., Bermúdez i Badia, S., & Verschure, P. (2007). The experience induction machine and its role in the research on presence. In The 10th international workshop on presence, 25–27 October.Google Scholar
  7. Bernardet, U., Bermúdez i Badia, S., & Verschure, P. (2008). A model for the neuronal substrate of dead reckoning and memory in arthropods: A comparative computational and behavioral study. Theory in Biosciences, 127(2). doi: 10.1007/s12064-008-0038-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brette, R., Rudolph, M., Carnevale, T., Hines, M., Beeman, D., Bower, J. M., et al. (2007). Simulation of networks of spiking neurons: A review of tools and strategies. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 23(3), 349–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Djurfeldt, M., & Lansner, A. (2007). Incf workshop report on large-scale modeling.Google Scholar
  10. Eng, K., Klein, D., Bäbler, A., Bernardet, U., Blanchard, M., Costa, M., et al. (2003). Design for a brain revisited: The neuromorphic design and functionality of the interactive space ‘Ada’. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 14, 145–180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Georgopoulos, A., Schwartz, A., & Kettner, R. (1986). Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science, 233, 1416–1419.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gewaltig, M. O., & Diesmann, M. (2007). Nest (neural simulation tool). Scholarpedia, 2(4), 1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guanella, A., & Verschure, P. (2006). Artificial neural networks—ICANN 2006. chap. A Model of Grid Cells Based on a Path Integration Mechanism. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/11840817_77.
  14. Herreros, I., Zimmerli, L., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2008). A biologically based model of the two-phase conditioning: The amygdala, auditory cortex and cerebellum. In: Proceedings computational and systems neuroscience 2008.Google Scholar
  15. Hines, M., & Carnevale, N. (1997). The NEURON simulation environment. Neural Computation, 9, 1179–1209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofstoetter, C., Mintz, M., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2002). The cerebellum in action: A simulation and robotics study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 1361–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hull, C. (1952). A behavior system: An introduction to behavior theory concerning the individual organism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hull, C., & Baernstein, H. (1929). A mechanical parallel to the conditioned relex. Science, 70(1801), 14–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hull, C., & Krueger, R. (1931). An electro-chemical parallel to the conditioned reflex. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 262–269.Google Scholar
  20. Josuttis, N. M. (1999). The C+ + standard library: A tutorial and reference (1st ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  21. Manzolli, J., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2005). Roboser: A real-world composition system. Computer Music Journal, 29(3), 55–74. doi: 10.1162/0148926054798133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mathews, Z., Bermúdez i Badia, S., & Verschure, P. (2008). Intelligent motor decision: From selective attention to a bayesian world model. In Intelligent systems, 2008. IS ’08. 4th international IEEE conference (Vol. 1, pp. 4–8). doi: 10.1109/IS.2008.4670418.
  23. Pyk, P., Bermúdez i Badia, S., Bernardet, U., Knüsel, P., Carlsson, M., Gu, J., et al. (2006). An artificial moth: Chemical source localization using a robot based neuronal model of moth optomotor anemotactic search. Autonomous Robotics, 2(3), 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sánchez-Montañés, M. A., Verschure, P. F. M. J., & König, P. (2000). Local and global gating of synaptic plasticity. Neural Computation, 12, 519–529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Shepherd, G. M. (2003). The synaptic organization of the brain. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Sporns, O., & Kötter, R. (2004). Motifs in brain networks. PLoS Biol, 2(11), e369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stroustrup, B. (1997). The C+ + programming language (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  28. Tolman, E. (1939). Prediction of vicarious trial and error by maens of the schematic sowbug. Psychological Review, 46, 318–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Verschure, P. F. M. J. (1997). Xmorph: A software tool for the synthesis and analysis of neural systems. Technical report, Institute of Neuroinformatics.Google Scholar
  30. Verschure, P. F. M. J., & König, P. (1999). On the role of biophysical properties of cortical neurons in binding and segmentation of visual scenes. Neural Computation, 11(5), 1113–1138. doi: 10.1162/089976699300016377.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Verschure, P. F. M. J., Voegtlin, T., & Douglas, R. J. (2003). Environmentally mediated synergy between perception and behaviour in mobile robots. Nature, 425, 620–624.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Vico, G. (1711). De antiquissima Italorum sapientia ex linguae originibus eruenda librir tres; On the Most Ancient Wisom of the Italians Unearthed form the Origins of the Latin Language, including the Disputation with “The Giornale de Letterati D’Italia” [1711], translated by L. M. Palmer. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1976). Cornell Paperbacks.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulysses Bernardet
    • 1
  • Paul F. M. J. Verschure
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Synthetic Perceptive, Emotive, and Cognitive Systems (SPECS)Universitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Catalan Institute of Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations