Advertisement

Endocrine

pp 1–12 | Cite as

NPWT in diabetic foot wounds—a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

  • Przemyslaw Rys
  • Sebastian Borys
  • Jerzy Hohendorff
  • Aleksandra Zapala
  • Przemyslaw Witek
  • Magdalena Monica
  • Claudia Frankfurter
  • Agnieszka Ludwig-Slomczynska
  • Beata Kiec-Wilk
  • Maciej T. MaleckiEmail author
Meta-Analysis
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an adjunct modality in diabetic foot ulcerations (DFUs). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown its advantage over standard approaches; however, data from observational studies remain scarce.We performed a systematic review of observational non-RCTs evaluating NPWT efficacy and safety in patients with DFU.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for observational studies involving NPWT. The results of single-arm studies were presented as percentages of patients with the outcome of interest. A meta-analysis of comparative studies provided point estimates of outcomes. Continuous outcomes were reported as either weighted or standardized mean differences and dichotomous data as relative risks (RR).

Results

The search identified 16 relevant observational studies, 12 single-arm, and 4 comparative, reporting on a total of 18,449 patients with DFU, of whom 1882 were managed with NPWT. In the NPWT-treated patients, ulcers were larger (average size range 6.6–27.9 cm2), as compared with controls (≤3 cm2). The pooled results showed healing and major amputation in 51% and 5% of NPWT patients, respectively. The meta-analysis of comparative studies revealed lower risk of major amputation [RR = 0.23 (0.07; 0.80)] in NPWT-treated patients. The pooled results for healing rate and risk of any amputation were inconclusive due to large between-study heterogeneity. Overall, 6 deaths out of 158 patients were reported, none of them related to NPWT. Serious adverse events occurred in 6% of patients on NPWT.

Conclusions

This systematic review of observational studies provided supportive evidence that NWPT is an efficient and safe adjunct treatment in the management of DFUs.

Keywords

Negative-pressure wound therapy Diabetic foot syndrome Wound healing 

Notes

Funding

The study was funded by the National Science Centre in Poland through the Opus Grant “Assessment of molecular mechanisms of NPWT in the treatment of neuropathic ulceration in DFS” to MTM (Nr 2013/11/B/NZ5/03298).

Author contributions

Study design, protocol development: PR, MTM; searching medical databases: PR, MM, AZ; data analysis: PR, AZ, MM; research data, data interpretation: SB, JH, MT, PR, AZ, BKW; writing the manuscript: MTM, PR; critical review of the manuscript: SB, JH; project coordination, final approval of the manuscript: PR, MTM; MTM and PR are the guarantors of the data and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12020_2019_2164_MOESM1_ESM.docx (164 kb)
Supplementary Material

References

  1. 1.
    A.J.M. Boulton, Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 24, S3–S6 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.G. Armstrong, A.J.M. Boulton, S.A. Bus, N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 2367–2375 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.W. Gregg, Y. Li, J. Wang, N. Rios Burrows, M.K. Ali, D. Rolka, D.E. Williams, L. Geiss, N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 1514–1523 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Claessen, H. Avalosse, J. Guillaume, M. Narres, T. Kvitkina, W. Arend, S. Morbach, P. Lauwers, F. Nobels, J. Boly, C. Van Hul, K. Doggen, I. Dumont, P. Felix, K. Van Acker, A. Icks, Diabetologia. 61, 1966–1977 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N.C. Schaper, J.J. Van Netten, J. Apelqvist, B.A. Lipsky, K. Bakker, International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF), Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 124, 84–92 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Apelqvist, C. Willy, A.-M. Fagerdahl, M. Fraccalvieri, M. Malmsjö, A. Piaggesi, A. Probst, P. Vowden, J. Wound Care. 26, S1–S154 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Borys, J. Hohendorff, C. Frankfurter, B. Kiec-Wilk, M.T. Malecki, Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 49, e13067 (2019).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Zhang, Z.-C. Hu, D. Chen, D. Guo, J.-Y. Zhu, B. Tang, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 134, 141–151 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Liu, C. He, Y. Cai, Q. Xing, Y. Guo, Z. Chen, J. Su, L. Yang, Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 13, 533–544 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.J. Ligthelm, V. Borzì, J. Gumprecht, R. Kawamori, Y. Wenying, P. Valensi, Clin. Ther. 29, 1284–1292 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Makady, A. de Boer, H. Hillege, O. Klungel, W. Goettsch, Value Health. 20, 858–865 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Higgins and S. Green (eds), Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane.book.org (2011)
  13. 13.
    M.H. Murad, S. Sultan, S. Haffar, F. Bazerbachi, BMJ Evid. Based Med. 23, 60–63 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. A. Sterne, M. A. Hernán, B. C. Reeves, J. Savović, N. D. Berkman, M. Viswanathan, D. Henry, D. G. Altman, M. T. Ansari, I. Boutron, J. R. Carpenter, A.-W. Chan, R. Churchill, J. J. Deeks, A. Hróbjartsson, J. Kirkham, P. Jüni, Y. K. Loke, T. D. Pigott, C. R. Ramsay, D. Regidor, H. R. Rothstein, L. Sandhu, P. L. Santaguida, H. J. Schünemann, B. Shea, I. Shrier, P. Tugwell, L. Turner, J. C. Valentine, H. Waddington, E. Waters, G. A. Wells, P. F. Whiting, and J. P. Higgins, BMJ. 355, i4919 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.P. Clare, T.C. Fitzgibbons, S.T. McMullen, R.C. Stice, D.F. Hayes, L. Henkel, Foot Ankle Int. 23, 896–901 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Nordmyr, S. Svensson, M. Björck, S. Acosta, Int. Angiol. J. Int. Union Angiol. 28, 26 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. Stone, N. Smith, Foot Ankle Int. 32, 272–277 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. Dalla Paola, A. Carone, G. Boscarino, G. Scavone, L. Vasilache, Int. J. Low. Extrem. Wounds. 15, 332–337 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    E.B. Goudie, C. Gendics, J.C. Lantis, Int. Wound J. 9, 132–138 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    B.S. Kim, W.J. Choi, M.K. Baek, Y.S. Kim, J.W. Lee, Foot Ankle Int. 32, 31–37 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A.E. Ulusal, M.S. Sahin, B. Ulusal, G. Cakmak, C. Tuncay, Acta Orthop. Traumatol. Turc. 45, 254–260 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    D.G. Armstrong, L.A. Lavery, P. Abu-Rumman, E.H. Espensen, J.R. Vazquez, B.P. Nixon, A.J.M. Boulton, Ostomy Wound Manag. 48, 64–68 (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C.M. Zelen, B. Stover, D. Nielson, M. Cunningham, Eplasty. 11, e5 (2011)PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Borys, J. Hohendorff, T. Koblik, P. Witek, A. Ludwig-Slomczynska, C. Frankfurter et al., Endocrine. 62, 611 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    L.A. Lavery, A.J. Boulton, J.A. Niezgoda, P. Sheehan, Int. Wound J. 4, 103–113 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    E. Tamir, A.S. Finestone, I. Wiser, Y. Anekstein, G. Agar, Adv. Ski. Wound Care. 31, 365–369 (2018)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    H.A. Saraiya, M.N. Shah, Adv. Ski. Wound Care. 26, 74–77 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    L.A. Lavery, D.P. Murdoch, P.J. Kim, J.L. Fontaine, G. Thakral, K.E. Davis, J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 8, 346–349 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    R.G. Frykberg, D.V. Williams, J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 97, 351–359 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    G. Stansby, V. Wealleans, L. Wilson, D. Morrow, C. Gooday, K. Dhatariya, J. Wound Care. 19, 496–502 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    B. Djulbegovic, G.H. Guyatt, Lancet. 390, 415–423 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    D.G. Armstrong, L.A. Lavery, Diabetic Foot Study Consortium, Lancet. 366, 1704–1710 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    P.A. Blume, J. Walters, W. Payne, J. Ayala, J. Lantis, Diabetes Care. 31, 631–636 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    The 2019 Working Group on Wound Healing Guidelines. https://iwgdfguidelines.org/guidelines/guidelines/ (2019).

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Przemyslaw Rys
    • 1
  • Sebastian Borys
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jerzy Hohendorff
    • 2
    • 3
  • Aleksandra Zapala
    • 1
  • Przemyslaw Witek
    • 2
    • 3
  • Magdalena Monica
    • 1
  • Claudia Frankfurter
    • 4
  • Agnieszka Ludwig-Slomczynska
    • 5
  • Beata Kiec-Wilk
    • 2
    • 3
  • Maciej T. Malecki
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.HTA ConsultingKrakowPoland
  2. 2.Department of Metabolic DiseasesJagiellonian University Medical CollegeKrakowPoland
  3. 3.Department of Metabolic DiseasesUniversity Hospital in KrakowKrakowPoland
  4. 4.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Center for Medical Genomics OMICRONJagiellonian University Medical CollegeKrakowPoland

Personalised recommendations