Advertisement

NeuroMolecular Medicine

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 90–96 | Cite as

NMDA Receptor GluN2 Subtypes Control Epileptiform Events in the Hippocampus

  • Pradeep PunnakkalEmail author
  • Deity Dominic
Original Paper

Abstract

NMDA receptors (NMDARs) play a key role in synaptic plasticity and excitotoxicity. Subtype-specific role of NMDAR in neural disorders is an emerging area. Recent studies have revealed that mutations in NMDARs are a cause for epilepsy. Hippocampus is a known focal point for epilepsy. In hippocampus, expression of the NMDAR subtypes GluN1/GluN2A and GluN1/GluN2B is temporally regulated. However, the pharmacological significance of these subtypes is not well understood in epileptic context/models. To investigate this, epilepsy was induced in hippocampal slices by the application of artificial cerebrospinal fluid that contained high potassium but no magnesium. Epileptiform events (EFEs) were recorded from the CA1 and DG areas of hippocampus with or without subtype-specific antagonists. Irrespective of the age group, CA1 and DG showed epileptiform activity. The NMDAR antagonist AP5 was found to reduce the number of EFEs significantly. However, the application of subtype-specific antagonists (TCN 201 for GluN1/GluN2A and Ro 25-69811 for GluN1/GluN2B) revealed that EFEs had area-specific and temporal components. In slices from neonates, EFEs in CA1 were effectively reduced by Ro 25-69811, but were largely insensitive to TCN 201. In contrast, EFEs in DG were equally sensitive to both of the subtype-specific antagonists. However, the differential sensitivity for the antagonists observed in neonates was absent in later developmental stages. The study provides a functional insight into the NMDAR subtype-dependent contribution of EFEs in hippocampus of young rats, which may have implications in treating childhood epilepsy and avoiding unnecessary side effects of broad spectrum antagonists.

Keywords

Epileptiform events TCN 201 Ro 25-69811 GluN2A GluN2B and NMDA receptors 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Anoopkumar T for the support, Dr. Shobi Veleri and Dr. Kalyanikutty K P for critically reading this manuscript and discussions, and Dr. John Dempster and Dr. William James Heitler for the software. This work was supported by the Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India (Ramalingaswami Re-entry Fellowship to PP, No. BT/RLF/Re-entry/04/2012).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Akazawa, C., Shigemoto, R., Bessho, Y., Nakanishi, S., & Mizuno, N. (1994). Differential expression of five N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit mRNAs in the cerebellum of developing and adult rats. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 347(1), 150–160.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903470112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, W. W., Lewis, D. V., Swartzwelder, H. S., & Wilson, W. A. (1986). Magnesium-free medium activates seizure-like events in the rat hippocampal slice. Brain Research, 398(1), 215–219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashwood, T. J., & Wheal, H. V. (1987). The expression of N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor-mediated component during epileptiform synaptic activity in hippocampus. British Journal of Pharmacology, 91(4), 815–822.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Berberich, S., Punnakkal, P., Jensen, V., Pawlak, V., Seeburg, P. H., Hvalby, Ø., et al. (2005). Lack of NMDA receptor subtype selectivity for hippocampal long-term potentiation. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 25(29), 6907–6910.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1905-05.2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berretta, N., Ledonne, A., Mango, D., Bernardi, G., & Mercuri, N. B. (2012). Hippocampus versus entorhinal cortex decoupling by an NR2 subunit–specific block of NMDA receptors in a rat in vitro model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia, 53(5), e80–e84.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03420.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Borbély, S., Dobó, E., Czégé, D., Molnár, E., Bakos, M., Szucs, B., et al. (2009). Modification of ionotropic glutamate receptor-mediated processes in the rat hippocampus following repeated, brief seizures. Neuroscience, 159(1), 358–368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.12.027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brady, R. J., Gorter, J. A., Monroe, M. T., & Swann, J. W. (1994). Developmental alterations in the sensitivity of hippocampal NMDA receptors to AP5. Brain Research. Developmental Brain Research, 83(2), 190–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang, B. S., & Lowenstein, D. H. (2003). Epilepsy. The New England Journal of Medicine, 349(13), 1257–1266.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra022308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, H.-S. V., & Lipton, S. A. (2006). The chemical biology of clinically tolerated NMDA receptor antagonists. Journal of Neurochemistry, 97(6), 1611–1626.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03991.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, Q., He, S., Hu, X.-L., Yu, J., Zhou, Y., Zheng, J., et al. (2007). Differential roles of NR2A- and NR2B-containing NMDA receptors in activity-dependent brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene regulation and limbic epileptogenesis. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(3), 542–552.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3607-06.2007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Croucher, M. J., Collins, J. F., & Meldrum, B. S. (1982). Anticonvulsant action of excitatory amino acid antagonists. Science (New York, N.Y.), 216(4548), 899–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dzhala, V. I., & Staley, K. J. (2003). Transition from interictal to ictal activity in limbic networks in vitro. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 23(21), 7873–7880.Google Scholar
  13. Edman, S., McKay, S., Macdonald, L. J., Samadi, M., Livesey, M. R., Hardingham, G. E., et al. (2012). TCN 201 selectively blocks GluN2A-containing NMDARs in a GluN1 co-agonist dependent but non-competitive manner. Neuropharmacology, 63(3), 441–449.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.04.027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Endele, S., Rosenberger, G., Geider, K., Popp, B., Tamer, C., Stefanova, I., et al. (2010). Mutations in GRIN2A and GRIN2B encoding regulatory subunits of NMDA receptors cause variable neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Nature Genetics, 42(11), 1021–1026.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.677.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Franck, J. E., Pokorny, J., Kunkel, D. D., & Schwartzkroin, P. A. (1995). Physiologic and morphologic characteristics of granule cell circuitry in human epileptic hippocampus. Epilepsia, 36(6), 543–558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Haut, S. R., Velísková, J., & Moshé, S. L. (2004). Susceptibility of immature and adult brains to seizure effects. The Lancet Neurology, 3(10), 608–617.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00881-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ikonomidou, C., & Turski, L. (2010). Antiepileptic drugs and brain development. Epilepsy Research, 88(1), 11–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2009.09.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen, F. E. (2009). Neonatal seizures: An update on mechanisms and management. Clinics in Perinatology, 36(4), 881–900.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2009.08.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaindl, A. M., Asimiadou, S., Manthey, D., Hagen, M. V. D., Turski, L., & Ikonomidou, C. (2006). Antiepileptic drugs and the developing brain. Cellular and molecular life sciences: CMLS, 63(4), 399–413.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-005-5348-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kalia, L. V., Kalia, S. K., & Salter, M. W. (2008). NMDA receptors in clinical neurology: Excitatory times ahead. The Lancet Neurology, 7(8), 742–755.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70165-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Kemp, J. A., & McKernan, R. M. (2002). NMDA receptor pathways as drug targets. Nature Neuroscience, 5(Suppl), 1039–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn936.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar, S. S., & Huguenard, J. R. (2003). Pathway-specific differences in subunit composition of synaptic NMDA receptors on pyramidal neurons in neocortex. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 23(31), 10074–10083.Google Scholar
  23. Lasztóczi, B., & Kardos, J. (2006). Cyclothiazide prolongs low [Mg2+]-induced seizure-like events. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96(6), 3538–3544.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00287.2006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Le Bail, M., Martineau, M., Sacchi, S., Yatsenko, N., Radzishevsky, I., Conrod, S., et al. (2015). Identity of the NMDA receptor coagonist is synapse specific and developmentally regulated in the hippocampus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(2), E204–E213.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416668112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lemke, J. R., Lal, D., Reinthaler, E. M., Steiner, I., Nothnagel, M., Alber, M., et al. (2013). Mutations in GRIN2A cause idiopathic focal epilepsy with rolandic spikes. Nature Genetics, 45(9), 1067–1072.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2728.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Meldrum, B. (1984). Amino acid neurotransmitters and new approaches to anticonvulsant drug action. Epilepsia, 25(Suppl 2), S140–S149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mody, I., Lambert, J. D., & Heinemann, U. (1987). Low extracellular magnesium induces epileptiform activity and spreading depression in rat hippocampal slices. Journal of Neurophysiology, 57(3), 869–888.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1987.57.3.869.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Monyer, H., Burnashev, N., Laurie, D. J., Sakmann, B., & Seeburg, P. H. (1994). Developmental and regional expression in the rat brain and functional properties of four NMDA receptors. Neuron, 12(3), 529–540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Moser, J., Kilb, W., Werhahn, K.-J., & Luhmann, H. J. (2006). Early developmental alterations of low-Mg2+ -induced epileptiform activity in the intact corticohippocampal formation of the newborn mouse in vitro. Brain Research, 1077(1), 170–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rauner, C., & Köhr, G. (2011). Triheteromeric NR1/NR2A/NR2B receptors constitute the major N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor population in adult hippocampal synapses. The Journal of biological chemistry, 286(9), 7558–7566.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.182600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rutecki, P. A., Sayin, U., Yang, Y., & Hadar, E. (2002). Determinants of ictal epileptiform patterns in the hippocampal slice. Epilepsia, 43(Suppl 5), 179–183.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sheng, M., Cummings, J., Roldan, L. A., Jan, Y. N., & Jan, L. Y. (1994). Changing subunit composition of heteromeric NMDA receptors during development of rat cortex. Nature, 368(6467), 144–147.  https://doi.org/10.1038/368144a0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tovar, K. R., McGinley, M. J., & Westbrook, G. L. (2013). Triheteromeric NMDA receptors at hippocampal synapses. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 33(21), 9150–9160.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0829-13.2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tsuda, M., Suzuki, T., & Misawa, M. (1997). Age-related decrease in the antiseizure effect of ifenprodil against pentylenetetrazole in mice. Brain Research. Developmental Brain Research, 104(1–2), 201–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Valenzuela, V., & Benardo, L. S. (1995). An in vitro model of persistent epileptiform activity in neocortex. Epilepsy Research, 21(3), 195–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wyllie, D. J. A., Livesey, M. R., & Hardingham, G. E. (2013). Influence of GluN2 subunit identity on NMDA receptor function. Neuropharmacology, 74, 4–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.01.016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Ye, G.-L., Yi, S., Gamkrelidze, G., Pasternak, J. F., & Trommer, B. L. (2005). AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated currents in developing dentate gyrus granule cells. Brain Research. Developmental Brain Research, 155(1), 26–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devbrainres.2004.12.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Yuan, H., Myers, S. J., Wells, G., Nicholson, K. L., Swanger, S. A., Lyuboslavsky, P., et al. (2015). Context-dependent GluN2B-selective inhibitors of NMDA receptor function are neuroprotective with minimal side effects. Neuron, 85(6), 1305–1318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molecular Medicine, Applied Biology, Biomedical Technology WingSree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and TechnologyTrivandrumIndia

Personalised recommendations