Irritant Contact Dermatitis
- 549 Downloads
Contact dermatitis accounts for 95% of occupational skin disorders. Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is often caused by cumulative exposure to weak irritants, accounting for 80% of all cases of contact dermatitis. ICD can co-exist with atopic dermatitis (AD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Patients with AD and ACD may have a lower inflammatory threshold for developing ICD. Therefore, it needs to be distinguished from lesions of AD and ACD. ICD Patients report stinging and burning in excess of pruritus. Pruritus is classically reported by patients with AD and ACD. ICD lesions are typically well-demarcated unlike AD and ACD. ICD is diagnosed by exclusion. Patients undergo testing to rule out type I and type IV hypersensitivity. Negative results suggest a diagnosis of ICD. Management consists of irritant identification and avoidance with regular emollient use. Although ICD is more common in certain occupations, genetics and environment play significant roles in its development.
KeywordsIrritant contact dermatitis (ICD) Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) Contact dermatitis Patch testing Occupational skin disease
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Sonia Bains is currently a Speaker for Pfizer 090117. Luz Fonacier received research and educational grants from Winthrop University Hospital, Genentech, Baxter, Pfizer, and Regeneron. She is also a Treasurer of the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (2015–2018) and a member of the American Board of Allergy and Immunology (ABAI) (2016–present). Pembroke Nash declares no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 6.Nosbaum A, Vocanson M, Rozieres A, Hennino A, Nicolas JF (2009) Allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol: EJD 19(4):325–332Google Scholar
- 8.Suarez-Farinas M, Tintle SJ, Shemer A, et al. (2011) Nonlesional atopic dermatitis skin is characterized by broad terminal differentiation defects and variable immune abnormalities. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 127(4):954–964.e951–954Google Scholar
- 10.Proksch E, Brasch J (1997) Influence of epidermal permeability barrier disruption and Langerhans' cell density on allergic contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 77(2):102–104Google Scholar
- 11.Shimada S, Caughman SW, Sharrow SO, Stephany D, Katz SI (1987) Enhanced antigen-presenting capacity of cultured Langerhans' cells is associated with markedly increased expression of Ia antigen. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 139(8):2551–2555Google Scholar
- 13.Mori T, Kabashima K, Yoshiki R, Sugita K, Shiraishi N, Onoue A, Kuroda E, Kobayashi M, Yamashita U, Tokura Y (2008) Cutaneous hypersensitivities to hapten are controlled by IFN-gamma-upregulated keratinocyte Th1 chemokines and IFN-gamma-downregulated Langerhans cell Th2 chemokines. J Investig Dermatol 128(7):1719–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Scharschmidt TC, Man MQ, Hatano Y, et al. (2009) Filaggrin deficiency confers a paracellular barrier abnormality that reduces inflammatory thresholds to irritants and haptens. J Allergy Clin Immunol;124(3):496–506, 506.e491–496Google Scholar
- 25.Lodde B, Paul M, Roguedas-Contios AM, Eniafe-Eveillard MO, Misery L, Dewitte JD (2012) Occupational dermatitis in workers exposed to detergents, disinfectants, and antiseptics. Skinmed 10(3):144–150Google Scholar
- 29.Modi GM, Doherty CB, Katta R, Orengo IF (2009) Irritant contact dermatitis from plants. Dermatitis: contact, atopic, occupational, drug 20(2):63–78Google Scholar
- 36.Fisher AA (1980) Cosmetic dermatitis. Part II. Reactions to some commonly used preservatives. Cutis 26(2):136–137 141–132, 147–138Google Scholar