Advertisement

Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 161–173 | Cite as

Allergy and Asthma Care in the Mobile Phone Era

  • Xinyuan Huang
  • Paolo Maria MatricardiEmail author
Article

Abstract

Strategies to improve patients’ adherence to treatment are essential to reduce the great health and economic burden of allergic rhinitis and asthma. Mobile phone applications (apps) for a better management of allergic diseases are growing in number, but their usefulness for doctors and patients is still debated. Controlled trials have investigated the feasibility, cost-effectiveness, security, and perspectives of the use of tele-medicine in the self-management of asthma. These studies focused on different tools or devices, such as SMS, telephone calls, automatic voice response system, mobile applications, speech recognition system, or cloud-computing systems. While some trials concluded that m-Health can improve asthma control and the patient’s quality of life, others did not show any advantage in relation to usual care. The only controlled study on allergic rhinitis showed an improvement of adherence to treatment among tele-monitored patients compared to those managed with usual care. Most studies have also highlighted a few shortcomings and limitations of tele-medicine, mainly concerning security and cost-efficiency. The use of smartphones and apps for a personalized asthma and allergy care needs to be further evaluated and optimized before conclusions on its usefulness can be drawn.

Keywords

Allergy Mobile health technology Mobile applications Mobile phone Asthma Allergic rhinitis 

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization (2011) Chronic respiratory diseases. Asthma. www.who.int/respiratory/asthma/en/
  2. 2.
    Brozek JL, Bousquet J, Baena-Cagnani CE et al (2010) Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines: 2010 revision. J Allergy Clin Immunol 126:466–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hellings PW, Fokkens WJ, Akdis C et al (2013) Uncontrolled allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis: where do we stand today? Allergy 68:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cutler DM, Everett W (2010) Thinking outside the pillbox—medication adherence as a priority for health care reform. N Engl J Med 362:1553–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bukstein D, Luskin AT, Farrar JR (2011) The reality of adherence to rhinitis treatment: identifying and overcoming the barriers. Allergy Asthma Proc 32:265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burnay E, Cruz-Correia R, Jacinto T et al (2013) Challenges of a mobile application for asthma and allergic rhinitis patient enablement-interface and synchronization. Telemed J E Health 19:13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Velasco HF, Cabral CZ, Pinheiro PP et al (2015) Use of digital media for the education of health professionals in the treatment of childhood asthma. J Pediatr (Rio J) 91:183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Apter A BB, Rand C. Adherence. In: Adkinson NF Jr, Bochner BS, Burks AW, et al (2014) Middleton’s allergy: principles and practice. 8th ed. . New York, NY: Elsevier 1471-1479Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kajioka EH, Itoman EM, Li ML et al (2005) Pediatric prescription pick-up rates after ED visits. Am J Emerg Med 23:454–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bender BG, Pedan A, Varasteh LT (2006) Adherence and persistence with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination therapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 118:899–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anhoj J, Moldrup C (2004) Feasibility of collecting diary data from asthma patients through mobile phones and SMS (short message service): response rate analysis and focus group evaluation from a pilot study. J Med Internet Res 6:e42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adibi S, ed (2015) Mobile health: a technology road map. Springer. (February 19, 2015). ISBN 978-3-319-12817-7Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garside J (2013) More mobile devices than people ‘within five years’. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/jun/06/more-mobile-devices-people-five-years.
  14. 14.
    Bousquet J, Schunemann HJ, Fonseca J et al (2015) MACVIA-ARIA Sentinel NetworK for allergic rhinitis (MASK-rhinitis): the new generation guideline implementation. Allergy 70:1372–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prabhakaran L, Chee WY, Chua KC et al (2010) The use of text messaging to improve asthma control: a pilot study using the mobile phone short messaging service (SMS). J Telemed Telecare 16:286–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lv Y, Zhao H, Liang Z et al (2012) A mobile phone short message service improves perceived control of asthma: a randomized controlled trial. Telemed J E Health 18:420–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang K, Wang C, Xi L et al (2014) A randomized controlled trial to assess adherence to allergic rhinitis treatment following a daily short message service (SMS) via the mobile phone. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 163:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Vera MA, Sadatsafavi M, Tsao NW et al (2014) Empowering pharmacists in asthma management through interactive SMS (EmPhAsIS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 15:488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pizzulli A, Perna S, Florack J et al (2014) The impact of telemonitoring on adherence to nasal corticosteroid treatment in children with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Clin Exp Allergy 44:1246–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aberg N, Dahl A, Benson M (2011) A nasally applied cellulose powder in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) in children and adolescents; reduction of symptoms and relation to pollen load. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 22:594–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baptist AP, Thompson M, Grossman KS et al (2011) Social media, text messaging, and email—preferences of asthma patients between 12 and 40 years old. J Asthma 48:824–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    MacDonell K, Gibson-Scipio W, Lam P et al (2012) Text messaging to measure asthma medication use and symptoms in urban African American emerging adults: a feasibility study. J Asthma 49:1092–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Britto MT, Munafo JK, Schoettker PJ et al (2012) Pilot and feasibility test of adolescent-controlled text messaging reminders. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 51:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Raju JD, Soni A, Aziz N et al (2012) A patient-centered telephone intervention using the asthma action plan. Fam Med 44:348–350Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Garbutt JM, Highstein G, Yan Y et al (2012) Partner randomized controlled trial: study protocol and coaching intervention. BMC Pediatr 12:42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Young HN, Havican SN, Griesbach S et al (2012) Patient and phaRmacist telephonic encounters (PARTE) in an underserved rural patient population with asthma: results of a pilot study. Telemed J E Health 18:427–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mulvaney SA, Ho YX, Cala CM et al (2013) Assessing adolescent asthma symptoms and adherence using mobile phones. J Med Internet Res 15:e141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bender BG, Cvietusa PJ, Goodrich GK et al (2015) Pragmatic trial of health care technologies to improve adherence to pediatric asthma treatment: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr 169:317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu WT, Huang CD, Wang CH et al (2011) A mobile telephone-based interactive self-care system improves asthma control. Eur Respir J 37:310–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ryan D, Price D, Musgrave SD et al (2012) Clinical and cost effectiveness of mobile phone supported self monitoring of asthma: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 344:e1756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Licskai C, Sands TW, Ferrone M (2013) Development and pilot testing of a mobile health solution for asthma self-management: asthma action plan smartphone application pilot study. Can Respir J 20:301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Haze KA, Lynaugh J (2013) Building patient relationships: a smartphone application supporting communication between teenagers with asthma and the RN care coordinator. Comput Inform Nurs 31:266–271, quiz 272-263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tripodi S, Comberiati P, Di Rienzo BA (2014) A web-based tool for improving adherence to sublingual immunotherapy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 25:611–612Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Costa C, Menesatti P, Brighetti MA et al (2014) Pilot study on the short-term prediction of symptoms in children with hay fever monitored with e-Health technology. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 46:216–225Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lucas RW, Dees J, Reynolds R et al (2015) Cloud-computing and smartphones: tools for improving asthma management and understanding environmental triggers. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 114:431–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cui H, Yao S (2015) Key technology and quantity control of wearable medical devices. Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi 39:113–117, 121Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schopf T, Flytkjaer V (2012) Impact of interactive web-based education with mobile and email-based support of general practitioners on treatment and referral patterns of patients with atopic dermatitis: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 14:e171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatric Pneumology and ImmunologyCharité Medical UniversityBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of PediatricShengzhou People’s HospitalZhejiangChina

Personalised recommendations