Stem Cell Reviews and Reports

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 523–530 | Cite as

Use of UTF1 Genetic Control Elements as iPSC Reporter

  • Amir Morshedi
  • Monireh Soroush Noghabi
  • Peter DrögeEmail author


The reprogramming of adult somatic cells into an embryonic stem cell (ESC) state by various means has opened a new chapter in basic and applied life science. While this technology will create great opportunities for regenerative medicine, the more immediate impact is likely to be found in human disease modeling and drug testing/development. An important aspect in the latter contexts is the ability to reliably monitor the pluripotent stem cell state, in particular with respect to human cell reprogramming using patient-specific somatic cells and high-throughput screens. Undifferentiated transcription factor 1 (UTF1) belongs to the core transcriptional network characterizing pluripotency. UTF1 is involved in ESC-specific chromatin organization, and its expression pattern during cell reprogramming and subsequent differentiation appears to be tightly connected with the pluripotent stem cell state. Here, we capitalized on these features and generated a reliable reporter system that was used to monitor induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) formation and subsequent differentiation. Our reporter cassette comprises less than 2.3 kb and remains functional during many cell passages after genomic integration. The fact that the human UTF1 genetic control elements work in a mouse background and the demonstrated functionality of the reporter in an epigenetic state further qualifies this system as a versatile new tool for iPSC research.


Induced pluripotent stem cells Undifferentiated transcription factor 1 Pluripotency reporter Differentiation Reporter gene silencing 



Special thanks go to Drs. K. Karjalainen and K. Pfannkuche for retroviral 4F expression vectors and a modified cardiomyocyte differentiation protocol, respectively. We also thank Dr. L.-F. Zhang for the provision of mESCs. This work was funded by the National Medical Research Council, Singapore (NMRC1114/2007), and SINGA (A*STAR) and NTU graduate scholarships.

Author Contributions

A.M.: collection of data, conception and design, analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing; M.S.N.: cell culture; manuscript writing; P.D.: conception, design, analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing.

Conflict of Interest

The authors indicate no potential conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

12015_2011_9342_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (21 kb)
Suppl. Table 1 (XLSX 20 kb)
12015_2011_9342_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (70 kb)
Suppl. Table 2 (XLSX 70 kb)


  1. 1.
    Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 126(4), 663–676.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wernig, M., Meissner, A., Foreman, R., et al. (2007). In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature, 448(7151), 318–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maherali, N., Sridharan, R., Xie, W., et al. (2007). Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell, 1(1), 55–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brambrink, T., Foreman, R., Welstead, G. G., et al. (2008). Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2(2), 151–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhong, J. F., Weiner, L., Jin, Y., Lu, W., & Taylor, C. R. (2010). A real-time pluripotency reporter for human stem cells. Stem Cells and Development, 19(1), 47–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Okuda, A., Fukushima, A., Nishimoto, M., et al. (1998). UTF1, a novel transcriptional coactivator expressed in pluripotent embryonic stem cells and extra-embryonic cells. EMBO Journal, 17(7), 2019–2032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fukushima, A., Nishimoto, M., Okuda, A., & Muramatsu, M. (1999). Carboxy-terminally truncated form of a coactivator UTF1 stimulates transcription from a variety of gene promoters through the TATA Box. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 258(3), 519–523.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kooistra, S. M., van den Boom, V., Thummer, R. P., et al. (2010). Undifferentiated embryonic cell transcription factor 1 regulates ESC chromatin organization and gene expression. Stem Cells, 28(10), 1703–1714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhao, Y., Yin, X., Qin, H., et al. (2008). Two supporting factors greatly improve the efficiency of Human iPSC generation. Stem Cell, 3(5), 475–479.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nishimoto, M., Fukushima, A., Okuda, A., & Muramatsu, M. (1999). The gene for the embryonic stem cell coactivator UTF1 carries a regulatory element which selectively interacts with a complex composed of Oct-3/4 and Sox-2. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 19(8), 5453–5465.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nishimoto, M., Miyagi, S., Yamagishi, T., et al. (2005). Oct-3/4 maintains the proliferative embryonic stem cell state via specific binding to a variant octamer sequence in the regulatory region of the UTF1 locus. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 25(12), 5084–5094.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tan, S. M., Wang, S. T., Hentze, H., & Droge, P. (2007). A UTF1-based selection system for stable homogeneously pluripotent human embryonic stem cell cultures. Nucleic Acids Research, 35(18), e118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mikkelsen, T. S., Hanna, J., Zhang, X., et al. (2008). Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature, 454(7200), 49–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Samavarchi-Tehrani, P., Golipour, A., David, L., et al. (2010). Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell, 7(1), 64–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pfannkuche, K., Fatima, A., Gupta, M. K., Dieterich, R., & Hescheler, J. (2010). Initial colony morphology-based selection for iPS cells derived from adult fibroblasts is substantially improved by temporary UTF1-based selection. PLoS One, 5(3), e9580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seiler, K., Soroush Noghabi, M., Karjalainen, K., Hummel, M., Melchers, F., & Tsuneto, M. (2011). Induced pluripotent stem cells expressing elevated levels of sox-2, oct-4, and klf-4 are severely reduced in their differentiation from mesodermal to hematopoietic progenitor cells. Stem Cells and Development, 20(7), 1131–1142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morita, S., Kojima, T., & Kitamura, T. (2000). Plat-E: an efficient and stable system for transient packaging of retroviruses. Gene Therapy, 7(12), 1063–1066.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fuegemann, C. J., Samraj, A. K., Walsh, S., Fleischmann, B. K., Jovinge, S., & Breitbach, M. (2010). Differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into cardiomyocytes via the hanging-drop and mass culture methods. Current Protocols in Stem Cell Biology. doi: 10.1002/9780470151808.
  19. 19.
    Okita, K., Ichisaka, T., & Yamanaka, S. (2007). Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature, 448(7151), 313–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yu, J., Vodyanik, M. A., Smuga-Otto, K., et al. (2007). Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science, 318(5858), 1917–1920.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stewart, R., Yang, C., Anyfantis, G., et al. (2008). Silencing of the expression of pluripotent driven-reporter genes stably transfected into human pluripotent cells. Regenerative Medicine, 3(4), 505–522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir Morshedi
    • 1
  • Monireh Soroush Noghabi
    • 2
  • Peter Dröge
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, Genome Institute of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations