Stem Cell Reviews and Reports

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 102–107 | Cite as

Diversity in Public Views Toward Stem Cell Sources and Policies

  • Edna Einsiedel
  • Shainur Premji
  • Rose Geransar
  • Noelle C. Orton
  • Thushaanthini Thavaratnam
  • Laura K. Bennett
Article

Abstract

Studies of public views on stem cell research have traditionally focused on human embryonic stem cells. With more recent scientific research on developing other stem cell sources, a series of focus group studies was undertaken with Canadian adults to examine their views on different stem cell sources (adult, umbilical cord blood, human embryonic stem cells, somatic cell nuclear transfer or SCNT, and interspecies nuclear transfer, or iSCNT). Views on three different policy models—a permissive, middle-of-the-road and restrictive policy approach—were also explored. Participants were recruited from several different social groups including patients, young adults, seniors, members of two ethnic communities, and a mixed group of adults. Participants were generally supportive of the use of adult stem cell sources. While there was also majority support for the use of hESC and SCNT, this was conditional on strict regulatory oversight. There was also majority support for a permissive policy which allows research on hESC and SCNT. General themes that cut across different groups included the potential cost of new technologies to the health care system, issues around who would gain access to these technologies, and trust in the scientific establishment and regulatory systems. A diversity of viewpoints was found as participants justified their positions on stem cell sources and policy approaches, showing more complexity and nuance than has been generally portrayed.

Keywords

Stem cell research Public perceptions Focus groups Stem cell policies Human embryonic stem cell attitudes Therapeutic cloning attitudes 

References

  1. 1.
    Pardo, R., & Calvo, F. (2008). Attitudes toward embryo research, worldviews, and the moral status of the embryo frame. Science Communication, 30(1), 8–47. doi:10.1177/1075547008319432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hudson, K., Scott, J., & Faden, R. (2005). Values in conflict: Public attitudes on embryonic stem cell research. Washington DC: Genetics and Public Policy Center.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nisbet, M. C. (2005). The Competition for Worldviews: Values, Information, and Public Support for Stem Cell Research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(1), 90–112. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nisbet, M. C. (2004). The polls: Public opinion about stem cell research and human cloning. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 132–55. doi:10.1093/poq/nfh009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Javitt, G. H., Suthers, K., & Hudson, K. (2007). Cloning: A policy analysis. Washington DC: Genetics and Public Policy Center.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shepherd, R., Barnett, J., Cooper, H., et al. (2007). Towards an Understanding of British public attitudes concerning human cloning. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 377–92. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.018.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Einsiedel, E. F. (2000). Cloning and its discontents: a Canadian perspective. Nature Biotechnology, 18(9), 943–4. doi:10.1038/79419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Critchley, C. (2004). Understanding Australians’ perceptions of controversial scientific research. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 2(2), 82–107.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wakayama, T., Tabar, V., Rodriguez, I., Perry, A. C. F., Studer, L., & Mombaerts, P. (2001). Differentiation of embryonic stem cell lines generated from adult somatic cells by nuclear transfer. Science, 292(5517), 740–3. doi:10.1126/science.1059399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, Y., He, Z. X., Liu, A., et al. (2003). Embryonic stem cells generated by nuclear transfer of human somatic nuclei into rabbit oocytes. Cell Research, 13(4), 251–63. doi:10.1038/sj.cr.7290170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Behyhan, Z., Lager, A. E., & Cibelli, J. B. (2007). Interspecies nuclear transfer: Implications for embryonic stem cell biology. Cell Stem Cell, 1(5), 502–12. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.10.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jensen, E. (2008). The dao of human cloning: utopian/dystopian hype in the British press and popular films. Public Understanding of Science, 17(2), 123–43. doi:10.1177/0963662506065874.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haran, J. (2007). Human cloning in the media: From science fiction to science practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edna Einsiedel
    • 1
  • Shainur Premji
    • 2
  • Rose Geransar
    • 2
  • Noelle C. Orton
    • 3
  • Thushaanthini Thavaratnam
    • 4
  • Laura K. Bennett
    • 5
  1. 1.Communication StudiesUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Department of Community Health SciencesUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of Communication and CultureUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  4. 4.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Toronto-ScarboroughTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Department of Political StudiesQueens UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations