Stem Cell Reviews and Reports

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 116–122 | Cite as

Ethical and Policy Issues Surrounding the Donation of Cryopreserved and Fresh Embryos for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Article

Abstract

The use of human embryos in human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research raises significant ethical and policy issues associated with their donation. Recent research conducted in several countries assesses the percent of persons with cryopreserved and fresh supernumerary embryos willing to donate them for research, their reasons for considering this option, and the concerns they raise about its personal import. Such research provides new insights into rising ethical and policy questions associated with embryo donation for hESC research that should be addressed. In response to such questions, it is argued here that consent to the donation of supernumerary embryos for hESC research should be sought in two or three stages, depending on whether fresh or frozen embryos are at issue, in order to provide patients and their partners with sufficient time and information before they make a final decision. In addition, steps should be taken to support the voluntariness of their decisions by having personnel other than the treating reproductive specialist or stem cell investigators solicit their consent. Prospective embryo donors should also be given a choice about the uses to which hESCs derived from their donated embryos will be put in order to honor their ethical convictions and ensure that there are sufficient embryos for this research. The well-being and rights of those who donate embryos for this research require the sort of support and protection that can be provided by an ethical and policy framework that allows hESC investigations to move forward according to standards that are transparent and that resound with public values.

Keywords

Human embryonic stem cell research Pluripotent stem cell research Ethics Policy Embryo donation Fresh embryos Cryopreserved embryos Informed consent Embryo donor preferences 

References

  1. 1.
    Takahasi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M,. Narita, M., Ichisaka, T., Tomoda, K. et al. (2007). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell, 131, 861–872. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu, J., Vodyanik, M. A., Smuga-Otto, K., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J., Frane, J. L., Tian, S., et al. (2007). Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science, 318, 1917–1920. doi:10.1126/science.1151526.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhou, Q., Brown, J., Kanarek, A., Rajagopal, J., & Melton, D. (2008). In vivo reprogramming of adult pancreatic exocrine cells to ß-cells. Nature, 455, 627–632. doi:10.1038/nature07314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thomson, J. A., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Shapiro, S. S., Waknitz, M. A., Swiergiel, J. J., Marshall, V. S., et al. (1998). Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science, 282, 1145–1147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    See, for example, United Kingdom Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. c. 37. (Accessed January 10, 2009, at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/acts1990/Ukpga_19900037_en_1.htm.)
  6. 6.
    See for example, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada and Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2008;102:203–216. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoffman, D. I., Zellman, G. L., Fair, C. C., Mayer, J. F., Zeitz, J. G., Gibbons, W. E., et al. (2003). Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research. Fertility and Sterility, 79, 1063–1069. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(03) 00172-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elford, K., Lawrence, C., & Leader, A. (2004). Research implications of embryo cryopreservation choices made by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 81, 1154–1155. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.08.048.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bankowski, B. J., Lyerly, A. D., Faden, R. R., & Wallach, E. E. (2005). The social implications of embryo cryopreservation. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 823–832. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.057.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Choudhary, M., Haimes, E., Herbert, M., Stojkovic, M., & Murdoch, A. M. (2004). Demographic, medical and treatment characteristics associated with couples’ decisions to donate fresh spare embryos for research. Human Reproduction, 19, 2091–2096. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen, C. B., Brandhorst, B., Nagy, A., Leader, A., Dickens, B., Isasi, R. M., et al. (2008). The use of fresh embryos in stem cell research: ethical and policy issues. Cell Stem Cell, 2, 416–421. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.04.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lysdahl, H., Gabrielson, A., Minger, S. L., Patel, M. J., Fink, T., Petersen, K., et al. (2006). Derivation and characterization of four new human embryonic stem cell lines: the Danish experience. Reprod Biomed Online, 12, 119–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moutel, G., Gregg, E., Meningaud, J. P., & Herve, C. (2002). Developments in the storage of embryos in France and the limitations of the laws of bioethics. Analysis of procedures in 17 storage centres and the destiny of stored embryos. Medicine and Law, 21, 587–604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McMahon, C. A., Gibson, F. L., Leslie, G. I., Saunders, D. M., Porter, K. A., & Tennant, C. C. (2003). Embryo donation for medical research: attitudes and concerns of potential donors. Human Reproduction, 18, 71–77. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bangsbøll, S., Pinborg, A., Andersen, C. Y., & Andersen, A. N., (2004). Patients’ attitudes toward donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research. Human Reproduction, 19, 2415–2419. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh441.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hammarberg, K., & Tinnery, L. (2006). Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples’ decisions and the factors influencing their choice. Fertility and Sterility, 86, 86–91. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.071.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lyerly, A. D., & Faden, R. R. (2007). Willingness to donate frozen embryos for stem cell research. Science, 317, 46–47. doi:10.1126/science.1145067.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lyerly, A. D., Steinhauser, K., & Voils, C. (2008). Fertility patients’ views about frozen embryo disposition; results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey. Fertil Steril, epub ahead of print.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lyerly, A. D., Steinhauser, K., Namey, E., Tulsky, J. A., Cook-Deegan, R., Sugarman, J., et al. (2006). Factors that affect infertility patients’ decisions about disposition of frozen embryos. Fertility and Sterility, 85, 1623–1630. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.056.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barratt, C. L., St. John, J. C. C., & Afnan, M. (2004). Clinical challenges in providing embryos for stem-cell initiatives. Lancet, 364, 115–118. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16649-X.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dickens, B. M., & Cook, R. J. (2007). Acquiring human embryos for stem-cell research. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 96, 67–71. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.10.005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    International Society for Stem Cell Research. Guidelines for the Conduct of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. (Accessed January 12, 2009, at http://www.isscr.org/guidelines/index.htm.)
  23. 23.
    National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2005). Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Washington, D.C.: National Academies. (Accessed December 29, 2008, at http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11278#toc.)
  24. 24.
    Fuscaldo, G., Russell, S., & Gillam, L. (2007). How to facilitate decisions about surplus embryos: patients’ views. Human Reproduction, 22, 3129–3138. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2007). Stem Cell Oversight Committee. Updated Guidelines for Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Research. (Accessed December 29, 2008, at http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/28215.html.)
  26. 26.
    Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Code of Practice, updated 30 September 2008. (Accessed December 29, 2008, at http://cop.hfea.gov.uk/cop.)
  27. 27.
    Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2003). Consent to the use and storage of gametes and embryos. (Accessed January 10, 2009, at http://www.parliament.gov.mt/information/Papers/BioTechnology/Dokumenti%20Prezentati%20lill-Kumitat/Doc%2079%20-%20Human%20Fertilisation%20and%20Embryology%20Authority%20Regulations%20-%20Part%208.pdf.)
  28. 28.
    Lo, B., Chou, V., Cedars, M. I., Gates, E., Taylor, R., Wagner, R., et al. (2004). Informed consent in oocyte, embryo, and embryonic stem cell research. Fertility and Sterility, 82, 559–563. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.040.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cohen, C. B., Brandhorst, B., Nagy, A., Leader, A., Dickens, B., Isasi, R. M., et al. (2008). The use of fresh embryos in stem cell research: ethical and policy issues. Cell Stem Cell, 2, 416–421. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.04.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cohen, C., & Majumder, M. (2009). Future directions for oversight of stem cell research in the United States. Kennedy Inst Ethics J, 19, In press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lauritzen, P. (1993). Pursuing parenthood (pp. xii–xvii). Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ryan, M. A. (2001). The ethics and economics of assisted reproduction: The cost of longing (pp. 68–78). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cohen, C. B., Enzle, M. E., Dickens, B., Brandhorst, B., Clark, T., Clute, C., et al. (2008). Oversight of stem cell research in Canada: protecting the rights, heath, and safety of embryo donors. Health Law Review, 16, 86–102.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cohen, C. B. (2001). Leaps and boundaries: expanding oversight of human stem cell research. In S. Holland, K. Lebacqz, & L. Zoloth (Eds.), The human embryonic stem cell debate: Science, ethics, and public policy (pp. 209–222). Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Heng, B. C. (2006). Donation of frozen surplus embryos for stem cell research or fertility treatment—should medical professionals and healthcare institutions be allowed to exercise undue influence on the informed decisions of their former patients? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 23, 381–382. doi:10.1007/s10815-006-9070-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2002). Ethics committee. Donating spare embryos for embryonic stem-cell research. Fertility and Sterility, 78, 957–960. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04234-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bjurestan, K., & Hovatta, O. (2003). Donation of embryos for stem cell research—how many couples consent? Human Reproduction, 18, 1353–1355. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kennedy Institute of EthicsGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Garrett ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations