Stem Cell Reviews and Reports

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 1–5 | Cite as

Regulation of Human Stem Cell Research in Australia

Article

Abstract

Australia is currently well placed to contribute to the global growth of human stem cell research. However, as the science has progressed, authorities have had to deal with the ongoing challenges of regulating such a fast moving field of scientific endeavour. Australia’s past and current approach to regulating the use of embryos in human embryonic stem cell research provides an insight into how Australia may continue to adapt to future regulatory challenges presented by human stem cell research. In the broader context, a number of issues have been identified that may impact upon the success of future human stem cell research in Australia.

Keywords

Human stem cell research Regulation Law reform Australia 

References

  1. 1.
    House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs (2001). Human cloning: scientific, ethical and regulatory aspects of human cloning and stem cell research. August.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Intergovernmental Agreement on Research Involving Human Embryos and Prohibition of Human Cloning. 31 March 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    See the Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002 (Cth) Pt 2, Div 1 and 2 as enacted.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    An excess ART embryo is one created by reproductive techniques for use in assisted reproductive technology treatment of a female but which has been determined in writing to be excess to the needs of the female and (if necessary) her spouse: Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002 (Cth) s 9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Previously contained in the Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002 (Cth), ss 21(3)(b), 24(5).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Previously contained in the Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002 (Cth), s 47.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Skene, L., Kerridge, I., Marshall, B., McCombe, P., & Schofield, P. (2008). The Lockhart committee: developing policy through commitment to moral values, community and democratic processes. Journal of Law and Medicine, 16, 132–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Legislation Review Committee (2005). Legislation Review: Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002 and Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002. December.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Infertility Treatment Amendment Act 2007 (Vic), Human Cloning and Other Prohibited Practices Amendment Act 2007 (NSW), Research Involving Human Embryos and Prohibition of Human Cloning Amendment Act 2007 (Qld), Human Cloning and Other Prohibited Practices Amendment Act 2007 (Tas); Human Cloning and Embryo Research Amendment Act 2008 (ACT). Victoria, Queensland, Tasmania and the ACT have had their legislation declared as corresponding law. In South Australia, the Statutes Amendment (Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and Regulation of Research Involving Human Embryos) Bill 2008 (SA) is currently before Parliament. In Western Australia, the Human Reproductive Technology Amendment Bill 2007 (WA) was defeated.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002 (Cth), pt 2 div 4.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction Act 2002 (Cth), pt 2.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Research Involving Human Embryos Regulations 2003 (Cth) reg 2.4.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    National Health Medical Research Council (2008). Embryo Research Licensing Committee, Report to the Parliament of Australia for the period 1 April to 30 September.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    See YZ v Infertility Treatment Authority [2005] VCAT 2655, [68]; Re Gray [2001] 2 Qd R 35, [8].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E.g. Transplantation and Anatomy Act 1978 (ACT); Human Tissue Act 1983 (NSW); Human Tissue Transplant Act (NT); Transplantation and Anatomy Act 1979 (Qld); Transplantation and Anatomy Act 1983 (SA); Human Tissue Act 1985 (Tas); Human Tissue Act 1982 (Vic); Human Tissue and Transplant Act 1982 (WA).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Macchiarini, P., Jungebluth, P., Go, T., et al. (2008). Clinical transplantation of a tissue-engineered airway. Lancet, 372, 2023–2030. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61598-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Drayton, L. (2008). Stem cell team forges global links. The Australian. 6 December.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    International Society for Stem Cell Research (2008). Guidelines for the Clinical Translation of Stem Cells. 3 December.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Skinner, R., Sanderson, A. (2008). Stem cell research in Australia: Collaboration, Legislation, Scientists and Public Accountability. World Stem Cell Report, 53.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Levine, A. (2008). Identifying under- and overperforming countries in research related to human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2, 521.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    The Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Act 2006 (Cth) repealed reg 7 of the Customs (Prohibited Exports) Regulations 1958 (Cth).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Law BuildingBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations