Advertisement

High Concentration of Sodium Metasilicate Impairs Autophagic Flux and Induces Apoptosis in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells

  • Zheng Li
  • Shuhao Liu
  • Yuanwu Cao
  • Tengfei Fu
  • Libo Jiang
  • Jian ZhangEmail author
Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Silicon-doped materials have been widely used in bone regeneration research; however, a consensus on the safety range of silicon ions has not been reached and its toxicity mechanism remains to be further elucidated. This study aims to explore whether high level of sodium metasilicate can induce toxicity effect in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and the role of autophagy and apoptosis in its toxic mechanism. HUVEC was treated with different level of high silicon and then investigated with respect to morphologic change, cell viability, immunofluorescence, the level of autophagy, and apoptosis-related protein. Moreover, bafilomycin A1 (Baf A1) was applied to detect whether autophagic flux is disrupted, and 3-methyladenine (3-MA, an autophagy inhibitor) was used to determine the relationship between autophagy and apoptosis. Results demonstrated that high-level silicon induced cell viability to decrease; LC3-II, p62, and apoptosis-related proteins were up-regulated after exposure to high-dose silicon (sodium metasilicate concentration more than 1 mM). There is no significant difference in LC3-II and p62 between Baf A1 and sodium metasilicate-exposed group. Besides, 3-MA further increased the apoptotic rate by inhibiting autophagy after high silicon exposure. Collectively, high concentration of silicon can impair autophagy and induce apoptosis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, and autophagy may play a protective role in HUVEC apoptosis. Furthermore, silicon concentration used in HUVEC should not be more than 1 mM.

Keywords

Sodium metasilicate Human umbilical vein endothelial cells Autophagic flux Apoptosis Bafilomycin A1 3-MA 

Abbreviations

HUVEC

Human umbilical vein endothelial cell

CCK-8

Cell Counting Kit-8

BAX

Bcl-2 associated X protein

PARP

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase

LC3

Light chain 3

3-MA

3-Methyladenine

Baf A1

Bafilomycin A1

ICP-AES

Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry

DAPI

4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

Notes

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the instruction work by professor Changsheng Liu and his fellow from East China University of Science and Technology.

Funding Information

This work was supported by the Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31330028)

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Carlisle EM (1970) Silicon: a possible factor in bone calcification. Science 167:279–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Du M, Zhang J, Wang J, Hu L, Shan W (2012) Evaluation of silicon extract from leaves of phyllostachys edulis for topical anti-osteoporosis activity. In: World Automation CongressGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henstock JR, Canham LT, Anderson SI (2015) Silicon: the evolution of its use in biomaterials. Acta Biomater 11:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jugdaohsingh R (2007) Silicon and bone health. J Nutr Health Aging 11:99–110PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Macdonald HM, Hardcastle AC, Jugdaohsingh R, Fraser WD, Reid DM, Powell JJ Dietary silicon interacts with oestrogen to influence bone health: evidence from the Aberdeen Prospective Osteoporosis Screening Study. Accessed (3)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rodella LF, Bonazza V, Labanca M, Lonati C, Rezzani R (2014) A review of the effects of dietary silicon intake on bone homeostasis and regeneration. J Nutr Health Aging 18:820–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    KA H, PA R, N S and T B (2006) Effect of silicon level on rate, quality and progression of bone healing within silicate-substituted porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Biomaterials 27:5014–5026Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dashnyam K, Elfiqi A, Buitrago JO, Perez RA, Knowles JC, Kim HW (2017) A mini review focused on the proangiogenic role of silicate ions released from silicon-containing biomaterials. J Tissue Eng 8 2041731417707339Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Han P, Wu C, Xiao Y (2013) The effect of silicate ions on proliferation, osteogenic differentiation and cell signalling pathways (WNT and SHH) of bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterialsence 1:379–392Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bennett C, Samikkannu M, Mohammed F, Dietrich WD, Rajguru SM, Prasad A (2018) Blood brain barrier (BBB)-disruption in intracortical silicon microelectrode implants. Biomaterials 164:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Biran R, Martin DC, Tresco PA (2005) Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays. Exp Neurol 195:115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thorburn A (2017) Autophagy and disease. J Biol Chem 293 jbcR117.810739Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marino G, Niso-Santano M, Baehrecke EH, Kroemer G (2014) Self-consumption: the interplay of autophagy and apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15:81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Booth LA, Tavallai S, Hamed HA, Cruickshanks N, Dent P (2014) The role of cell signalling in the crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis. Cell Signal 26:549–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu X, Sun J (2010) Endothelial cells dysfunction induced by silica nanoparticles through oxidative stress via JNK/P53 and NF-κB pathways. Biomaterials 31:8198–8209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mladenovic Z, Johansson A, Willman B, Shahabi K, Bjorn E, Ransjo M (2014) Soluble silica inhibits osteoclast formation and bone resorption in vitro. Acta Biomater 10:406–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li Z, Liu F, Zhang L, Cao Y, Shao Y, Wang X, Jiang X, Chen Z (2018) Neuroserpin restores autophagy and promotes functional recovery after acute spinal cord injury in rats. Mol Med Rep 17:2957–2963PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Novosel EC, Kleinhans C, Kluger PJ (2011) Vascularization is the key challenge in tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63:300–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Santos MI, Unger RE, Sousa RA, Reis RL, Kirkpatrick CJ (2009) Crosstalk between osteoblasts and endothelial cells co-cultured on a polycaprolactone-starch scaffold and the in vitro development of vascularization. Biomaterials 30:4407–4415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grellier M, Bordenave L, Amédée J (2009) Cell-to-cell communication between osteogenic and endothelial lineages: implications for tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 27:562–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pruksa S, Siripinyanond A, Powell JJ, Jugdaohsingh R (2014) Silicon balance in human volunteers; a pilot study to establish the variance in silicon excretion versus intake. Nutr Metab (Lond) 11(1):4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li H, Ke X, Ni K, Kai L, Jiang C (2014) Silicate bioceramics enhanced vascularization and osteogenesis through stimulating interactions between endothelia cells and bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials 35:3803–3818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhai W, Lu H, Chen L, Lin X, Huang Y, Dai K, Naoki K, Chen G, Chang J (2012) Silicate bioceramics induce angiogenesis during bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 8:341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Duan J, Yu Y, Li Y, Yu Y, Sun Z (2013) Cardiovascular toxicity evaluation of silica nanoparticles in endothelial cells and zebrafish model. Biomaterials 34:5853–5862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim KH, Lee MS (2014) Autophagy--a key player in cellular and body metabolism. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10:322–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guo C, Yang M, Jing L, Wang J, Yu Y, Li Y, Duan J, Zhou X, Li Y, Sun Z (2016) Amorphous silica nanoparticles trigger vascular endothelial cell injury through apoptosis and autophagy via reactive oxygen species-mediated MAPK/Bcl-2 and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling. Int J Nanomedicine 11:5257–5276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang J, Yu Y, Lu K, Yang M, Li Y, Zhou X, Sun Z (2017) Silica nanoparticles induce autophagy dysfunction via lysosomal impairment and inhibition of autophagosome degradation in hepatocytes. Int J Nanomedicine 12:809–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Asweto CO, Wu J, Alzain MA, Hu H, Andrea S, Feng L, Yang X, Duan J, Sun Z (2017) Cellular pathways involved in silica nanoparticles induced apoptosis: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 56:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nakamura S, Yoshimori T (2017) New insights into autophagosome-lysosome fusion. J Cell Sci 130:1209–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mukhopadhyay S, Panda PK, Sinha N, Das DN, Bhutia SK (2014) Autophagy and apoptosis: where do they meet? Apoptosis 19:555–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsZhongshan Hospital of Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations