Biological Trace Element Research

, Volume 179, Issue 1, pp 70–78 | Cite as

Effects of Chromium Methionine Supplementation with Different Sources of Zinc on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, Meat Quality, Serum Metabolites, Endocrine Parameters, and the Antioxidant Status in Growing-Finishing Pigs

  • Xiao Xu
  • Li Liu
  • Shen-Fei Long
  • Xiang-Shu Piao
  • Terry L. Ward
  • Fei Ji
Article

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of chromium methionine with/without zinc sulfate or zinc amino acid complex on the growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, serum parameters, endocrine parameters, and antioxidant status of growing-finishing pigs. A total of 180 (32.0 ± 1.7 kg body weight, BW) crossbred pigs (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire) were used in a completely randomized design with three dietary treatments and 10 replicates per treatment (five pens of barrows and five pens of gilts with six pigs per replicate). Three treatments were corn-soybean meal-based diets supplemented with 100 mg Zn/kg from zinc sulfate (ZnSO4), 100 mg Zn/kg from ZnSO4 + 0.2 mg Cr/kg from chromium methionine complex (CrMet), or 50 mg Zn/kg from ZnSO4 + 50 mg Zn/kg from zinc amino acid complex (ZnAA) + 0.2 mg Cr/kg from CrMet, respectively. The experiment lasted 105 days, of which was divided into three stages including phase 1 (30 to 50 kg BW), phase 2 (50 to 80 kg BW), and phase 3 (80 to 110 kg BW). Results showed that supplementation with CrMet and ZnAA improved (P < 0.05) the feed conversion of the pigs in phase 2, phase 3, and the overall experiment. Hot carcass weight, dressing percentage, and a longissimus dorsi muscle area were increased (P < 0.05) in pigs fed with diets supplemented with both CrMet and ZnAA compared with pigs fed with diets containing only ZnSO4 (P < 0.05). There was also an increase (P < 0.01) pH24 h in the longissimus dorsi muscle in pigs fed with diets supplemented with CrMet and ZnAA. The concentration of serum glucose in pigs fed with diets containing CrMet and ZnAA was decreased (P < 0.05) compared with that in pigs fed with the diet containing ZnSO4. Supplementation with CrMet and ZnAA increased (P < 0.05) the circulating levels of insulin and decreased (P < 0.05) cortisol. There was an increase (P < 0.05) in total serum antioxidant capacity and Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase activity as well as a decrease (P < 0.05) in serum malondialdehyde concentrations in pigs fed with diets supplemented with CrMet and ZnAA compared with pigs fed with the diet supplemented only with ZnSO4. In conclusion, supplementation of CrMet only or CrMet together with ZnAA improved feed conversion, carcass traits, and meat quality in the growing-finishing pigs.

Keywords

Antioxidant Carcass Chromium Performance Pigs Zinc 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was made possible by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 31372316), the 111 Project (B16044), and Zinpro (Wuxi) Additives Bio-Technology Co., LTD.

References

  1. 1.
    Ohh SJ, Kim CH, Shin JS, Sung KI, Kim HS (2004) Effects of different forms of chromium supplements on serum glucose, insulin and lipids in rats. J Food Sci Nutr 9:342–345Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matthews JO, Southern LL, Fernandez JM, Pontif JE, Bidner TD, Odgaard RL (2001) Effects of chromium picolinate and chromium propionate on glucose and insulin kinetics of growing barrows and on growth and carcass traits of growing-finishing barrows. J Anim Sci 79(8):2172–2178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lindemann MD, Wood CM, Harper AF, Kornegay ET, Anderson RA (1995) Dietary chromium picolinate additions improve gain/feed and carcass characteristics in growing/finishing pigs and increases litter size in reproducing sows. J Anim Sci 73(2):457–465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kegley EB, Fakler TM, Maxwell CV (1999) Effect of dietary chromium-L-methionine on glucose metabolism of growing pigs. J Anim Sci 77(Suppl 1):67 (Abstr.)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kegley EB, Galloway DL, Fakler TM (2000) Effect of dietary chromium-L-methionine on glucose metabolism of beef steers. J Anim Sci 78(12):3177–3183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Emami A, Ganjkhanlou M, Zali A (2015) Effects of Cr methionine on glucose metabolism, plasma metabolites, meat lipid peroxidation, and tissue chromium in Mahabadi goat kids. Biol Trace Elem Res 164(1):50–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mooney KW, Cromwell GL (1995) Effects of dietary chromium picolinate supplementation on growth, carcass characteristics, and accretion rates of carcass tissues in growing-finishing swine. J Anim Sci 73(11):3351–3357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jackson AR, Powell S, Johnston SL, Matthews JO, Bidner TD, Valdez FR, Southern LL (2009) The effect of chromium as chromium propionate on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, and the fatty acid profile of fat from pigs fed no supplemented dietary fat, choice white grease, or tallow. J Anim Sci 87(12):4032–4041CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park JK, Lee JY, Chae BJ, Ohh SJ (2009) Effects of different sources of dietary chromium on growth, blood profiles and carcass traits in growing-finishing pigs. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 22(11):1547–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li YS, Zhu NH, Niu PP, Shi FX, Hughes CL, Tian GX, Huang RH (2013) Effects of dietary chromium methionine on growth performance, carcass composition, meat colour and expression of the colour-related gene myoglobin of growing-finishing pigs. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 26(7):1021–1029CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee BH, Nejad JG, Kim BW, Ohh SJ, Sung KI (2016) Fatty acid profile of meat, diurnal changes in volatile fatty acids, rumen fluid parameters, and growth performance in Korean native (Hanwoo) steers fed high- and low-forage diets supplemented with chromium-methionine. R Bras Zootec 45(8):483–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nejad JG, Lee BH, Kim BW, Ohh SJ, Sung KI (2016) Effects of chromium methionine supplementation on blood metabolites and fatty acid profile of beef during late fattening period in Holstein steers. Asian Austral J Anim Sci 29(3):378–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tian YY, Zhang LY, Dong B, Cao J, Xue JX, Gong LM (2014) Effects of chromium methionine supplementation on growth performance, serum metabolites, endocrine parameters, antioxidant status, and immune traits in growing pigs. Biol Trace Elem Res 162(1–3):134–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Dell BL (2000) Role of zinc in plasma membrane function. J Nutr 130(Suppl. 5S):1432S–1436SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hahn JD, Baker DH (1993) Growth and plasma zinc responses of young pigs fed pharmacological levels of zinc. J Anim Sci 71(11):3020–3024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baker DH, Ammerman CB (1995) Zinc bioavailability. In: Ammerman CB, Baker DH, Lewis AJ (eds) Bioavailability of nutrients for animals: amino acids, minerals, and vitamins. Academic Press, San Diego, p 367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wedekind KJ, Hortin AE, Baker DH (1992) Methodology for assessing zinc bioavailability: efficacy estimates for zinc methionine, zinc sulphate and zinc oxide. J Anim Sci 70(1):178–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ward TL, Asche GA, Louis GF, Pollmann DS (1996) Zinc-methionine improves growth performance of starter pigs. J Ainm Sci 74(Suppl. 1):303 (Abstr.)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    NRC (2012) Nutrient requirements of swine, 11th revised edn. National Academic Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    AOAC (2000) Official methods of analysis, 17th revised edn. Association of official analytical chemists, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang FR, Zhan ZP, Luo J, Liu ZX, Peng J (2008) Duration of dietary linseed feeding affects the intramuscular fat, muscle mass and fatty acid composition in pig muscle. Livest Sci 118(1–2):132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ray FK (2004) Pork carcass evaluation and procedures. Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Oklahoma State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Honikel KO (1998) Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci 49(4):447–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    SAS Institute (2002) STAT user’s guide: statistics. Version 9.1. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis System Institute, IncGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sales J, Jancik F (2011) Effects of dietary chromium supplementation on performance, carcass characteristic, and meat quality of growing-finishing swine: a meta-analysis. J Anim Sci 89(12):4054–4067CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang Y, Tang JW, Ma WQ, Feng J, Feng J (2010) Dietary zinc glycine chelate on growth performance, tissue mineral concentrations, and serum enzyme activity in weanling piglets. Biol Trace Elem Res 133(3):325–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ward TL, Asche GA, Louis GF, Pollmann DS (1996) Zinc-methionine improves growth performance of starter pigs. J Anim Sci 74(Suppl. 1):182 (Abst.)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang MQ, Xu ZR (2004) Effect of chromium nanoparticle on growth performance, carcass characteristics, pork quality and tissue chromium in finishing pigs. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 17(8):1118–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shinde P, Dass RS, Garg AK, Chaturvedi VK, Kuwar R (2006) Effect of zinc supplementation from different sources on growth, nutrient digestibility, blood metabolic profile, and immune response of male guinea pigs. Biol Trace Elem Res 112(6):247–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee IK, Kye YC, Kim G, Kim HW, Gu MJ, Umboh J, Maaruf K, Kim SW, Yun CH (2016) Stress, nutrition, and intestinal immune responses in pigs—a review. Asian Austral J Anim Sci 29(8):1075–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tian YY, Gong LM, Xue JX, Cao J, Zhang LY (2015) Effects of graded levels of chromium methionine on performance, carcass traits, meat quality, fatty acid profiles of fat, tissue chromium concentrations, and antioxidant status in growing-finishing pigs. Biol Trace Elem Res 168(1):110–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Page TG, Southern LL, Ward TL, Thompson DL (1993) Effect of chromium picolinate on growth and serum and carcass traits of growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 71(3):656–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mooney KW, Cromwell GL (1997) Efficacy of chromium picolinate and chromium chloride as potential carcass modifiers in swine. J Anim Sci 75(10):2661–2671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Spears JW, Kegley EB (2002) Effect of zinc source (zinc oxide vs. zinc proteinate) and level on performance, carcass characteristics, and immune response of growing and finishing steers. J Anim Sci 80(10):2747–2752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lien TF, Wu CP, Wang BJ, Shiao MS, Shiao TY, Lin BH, Lu JJ, Hu CY (2001) Effect of supplemental levels of chromium picolinate on the growth performance, serum traits, carcass characteristics and lipid metabolism of growing-finishing pigs. Anim Sci 72(3):289–296Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cao J, Henry PR, Guo R, Holwerda RA, Toth JP, Littell RC, Miles RD, Ammerman CB (2000) Chemical characteristics and relative bioavailability of supplemental organic zinc sources for poultry and ruminants. J Anim Sci 78(8):2039–2054CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Spears JW (1996) Organic trace minerals in ruminant nutrition. Anim Feed Sci Technol 58(1–2):151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Matthews JO, Guzik AC, Lemieux FM, Southern LL, Bidner TD (2005) Effects of chromium propionate on growth, carcass traits, and pork quality of growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 83(4):858–862CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Huff-Lonergan E (2002) Water-holding capacity of fresh meat. Fact Sheet (04669). National pork board, Des MoinesGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chang X, Mowat DN (1992) Supplemental chromium for stressed and growing feeder calves. J Anim Sci 70(2):559–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Evans GW, Bowman TD (1992) Chromium picolinate increases membrane fluidity and rate of insulin internalization. J Inorg Biochem 46(4):243–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vernon RG, Sasaki S (1991) Control of responsiveness of tissues to hormones. In: Tsuda T, Sasaki Y, Kawashima R (eds) Physiological aspects of digestion and metabolism in ruminants. Proc 7th Int Symp Rumin Physiol. Aug 28-Sept 1 (1989), Japan. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Weekes TEC (1991) Hormonal control of glucose metabolism. In: Tsuda T, Sasaki Y, Kawashima R (eds) Physiological aspects of digestion and metabolism in ruminants. Proc 7th Int Symp Rumin Physiol. Aug 28-Sept 1 (1989), Japan. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mowat DN, Chang X, Yang WZ (1993) Chelated chromium for stressed feeder calves. Can J Anim Sci 73(1):49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Roth HP, Kirchgessner M (1981) Zinc and insulin metabolism. Biol Trace Elem Res 3(1):13–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Samanta S, Haldar S, Bahadur V, Ghosh TK (2008) Chromium picolinate can ameliorate the negative effects of heat stress and enhance performance, carcass and meat traits in broiler chickens by reducing the circulatory cortisol level. J Sci Food Agric 88(5):787–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Prasad AS (1984) Discovery and importance of zinc in human nutrition. Fed Proc 43(11):2829–2834PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pimentel L, Cook ME, Greger JL (1992) Anemia induced by ingestion feeding colostrums for different duration or only milk of excess zinc in chick: importance of red blood cell replacer. J Nutr Biochem 3(3):146–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhang CS, Zhu WJ, Guan XM, Song JC (2006) Effects of interaction between dietary zinc and vitamin A in broilers on performance, immunity, ALP and CuZn-SOD activity and serum insulin concentration. World J Zool 1(1):17–23Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiao Xu
    • 1
  • Li Liu
    • 1
  • Shen-Fei Long
    • 1
  • Xiang-Shu Piao
    • 1
  • Terry L. Ward
    • 2
  • Fei Ji
    • 3
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry CentreChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Zinpro CorporationEden PrairieUSA
  3. 3.Zinpro (Wuxi) Additives Bio-Technology Co., LTD.Minhang, ShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations