Advertisement

Biological Trace Element Research

, Volume 151, Issue 1, pp 38–42 | Cite as

Effects of Increasing Supplementation of Magnesium in Diets on Productive Performance and Eggshell Quality of Aged Laying Hens

  • Chan Ho Kim
  • In Kee Paik
  • Dong Yong KilEmail author
Article

Abstract

Magnesium (Mg) concentrations in diets have been associated with performance and eggshell quality of laying hens, but the results have been inconclusive. In this experiment, the effects of increasing concentrations of dietary Mg on productive performance and eggshell quality of aged laying hens were evaluated. A total of 640 Hy-Line Brown laying hens of 72 weeks of age were randomly allotted to one of four dietary treatments with four replicates per treatment. A commercial-type basal diet containing 1.6 g/kg Mg was prepared, and three additional diets were prepared to contain 2.3, 2.6, or 3.0 g/kg Mg in diets by adding 1.0, 1.5, or 2.0 g of MgO to the basal diet. The diets were fed to hens ad libitum for 5 weeks. Results indicated that Mg concentrations in eggshells were increased (linear, P < 0.01) with increasing concentrations of Mg in diets. Increasing concentrations of Mg in diets decreased (linear and quadratic, P < 0.01) broken and shell-less egg production, but improved (linear, P < 0.05) eggshell strength. Feed intake was decreased (linear, P < 0.05) with the concentrations of Mg in diets, but hen-day egg production, egg weight, feed conversion ratio, and Haugh unit were not affected by increasing concentrations of Mg in diets. Hunter L* and a* values of eggshell were decreased (linear, P < 0.05) as the concentrations of Mg in diets increased. In conclusion, feeding aged laying hens with diets containing increasing concentrations of Mg up to 3.0 g/kg improves eggshell strength, but has no detrimental effects on laying performance.

Keywords

Dietary magnesium Eggshell quality Laying hens Performance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Chung-Ang University Research Grants in 2011. This research was also co-sponsored by the GRRC program of Gyeonggi Province (GRRC Chung-Ang 20120959).

References

  1. 1.
    Scott ML, Hull SJ, Mullenhoff PA (1970) The calcium requirements of laying hens and effects of dietary oystershell upon egg shell quality. Poult Sci 50:1055–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edwards HM Jr, Nugara D (1968) Magnesium requirement of the laying hen. Poult Sci 47:963–966PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hamilton RMG, Sibbald IR (1977) The effects of dietary phosphorus on productive performance and egg quality of ten strains of white leghorns. Poult Sci 56:1221–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Board RG, Love G (1980) Magnesium distribution in avian eggshells. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol 66:667–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Romanoff AL, Romanoff AJ (1949) The avian egg. Wiley, New York, pp 353–354Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stafford JE, Edwards NA (1973) Magnesium metabolism in the laying fowl. Br Poult Sci 14:137–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ding ST, Shen TF (1992) The effect of dietary magnesium level on the eggshell quality in laying Tsaiya duck and Leghorn hen. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 5:217–224Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    National Research Council (1994) Nutrient requirements of poultry, 9th edn. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mehring AL Jr, Johnson D Jr (1965) Magnesium in limestones for laying chickens. Poult Sci 44:853–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    West BL, Williams PL, Nockels CF, Enos HL (1980) Calcium, magnesium and phosphorus for aging hens. Poult Sci 59:1672Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seo YM, Shin KS, Rhee AR, Chi YS, Han J, Paik IK (2010) Effects of dietary Fe-soy proteinate and MgO on egg production and quality of eggshell in laying hens. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 23:1043–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roland DA Sr (1979) Factors influencing shell quality of aging hens. Poult Sci 58:774–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roland DA Sr, Putman CE, Hilburn RL (1978) The relationship of age on ability of hens to maintain egg shell calcification when stressed with inadequate dietary calcium. Poult Sci 57:1616–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eisen EJ, Bohren BB, Mckean HE (1962) The Haugh units as a measure of egg albumen quality. Poult Sci 41:1461–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    AOAC (1995) Official method of analysis, 16th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Institute SAS (2003) SAS/STAT® user's guide: statistics, version 9.1. SAS Institute, Inc, CaryGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brooks J, Hale HP (1955) Strength of the shell of the hen's egg. Nature 175:848–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Klingensmith PM, Hester PY (1985) Effects of an induced molt and shell quality on the physical dimensions and mineral composition of eggs and intrauterine pH. Poult Sci 64:2368–2376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Atteh JO, Leeson S (1983) Influence of increasing dietary calcium and magnesium levels on performance, mineral metabolism, and egg mineral content of laying hens. Poult Sci 62:1261–1268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hossain SM, Bertechini AG (1998) Effects of varying levels of magnesium and available phosphorus on performance of layers. Anim Feed Sci Technol 71:363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Monsey JB, Robinson DS (1977) The effect of feeding magnesium-enriched diets on the quality of the albumen of stored eggs. Br J Nutr 37:35–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holder DP, Huntley DM (1978) Influence of added manganese, magnesium, zinc, and calcium level on eggshell quality. Poult Sci 57:1629–1634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hess JB, Britton WM (1997) Effects of dietary magnesium excess in white leghorn hens. Poult Sci 76:703–710PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang XT, Zhao CJ, Li JY, Xu GY, Lian LS, Wu CX, Deng XM (2009) Comparison of the total amount of eggshell pigments in Dongxiang brown-shelled eggs and Dongxiang blue-shelled eggs. Poult Sci 88:1735–1739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal Science and Technology, School of Bioresource and Bioscience, College of Natural SciencesChung-Ang UniversityAnseong-siRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations