Advertisement

Biological Trace Element Research

, Volume 143, Issue 2, pp 901–912 | Cite as

Dietary Supplementation of Boron Differentially Alters Expression of Borate Transporter (NaBCl) mRNA by Jejunum and Kidney of Growing Pigs

  • Shengfa F. Liao
  • James S. Monegue
  • Merlin D. Lindemann
  • Gary L. Cromwell
  • James C. Matthews
Article

Abstract

Inorganic boron (B), in the form of various borates, is readily absorbed across gastrointestinal epithelia. Although there is no stated B requirement, dietary B supplementation is thought to positively affect animal growth and metabolism, including promotion of bone strength and cell proliferation. Because of effective homeostatic control of plasma B levels, primarly by renal excretion, B toxicity in animals and humans is rare. The mechanisms responsible for improved animal performance and borate homeostasis are incompletely understood. Although a Na+-coupled borate transporter (NaBC1) has been identified, the effect of dietary B supplementation on expression of NaBCl has not been evaluated. An experiment was conducted with growing pigs to determine if NaBC1 mRNA was expressed by small intestinal epithelia and kidney of growing barrows and whether dietary B (as borate) supplementation would affect expression of NaBC1 mRNA. A concomitant objective was to test the hypothesis that B supplementation of a phosphorus (P)-deficient diet would improve calcium, phosphorus, or nitrogen retention. Twenty-four crossbred growing barrows (body weight = 74.0 ± 9.8 kg) were selected and used in a randomized complete block design experiment with a total of eight blocks and three B supplementation treatments (n = 8/treatment). A typical corn-soybean meal basal diet (calculated to contain 41 mg intrinsic B/kg) was formulated to meet or exceed nutrient requirements, except for P, and fed to all pigs for 12 days. The basal diet plus 0, 50, or 100 mg/kg of B (prilled sodium borate pentahydrate, \( {\hbox{N}}{{\hbox{a}}_2}{{\hbox{B}}_4}{{\hbox{O}}_7} \cdot 5{{\hbox{H}}_2}{\hbox{O}} \)) was then fed for 18 more days. Feces and urine were collected during days 6 to 16 of the B supplementation, and pigs were killed for collection of jejunal and ileal epithelia and kidney tissue. Real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed that NaBC1 mRNA was expressed by these tissues, a novel finding for jejunal and ileal epithelia. Boron supplementation increased jejunal, but decreased, renal NaBC1 mRNA expression, relative to the 0 mg/kg treatment. The finding that NaBC1 mRNA is regulatable by dietary B is novel. That B supplementation evoked opposite effects on jejunal and kidney NaBC1 mRNA expression indicates that transcriptional regulation of NaBC1 expression may constitute a part of the homeostatic control of B metabolism. In contrast to its effect on NaBC1 mRNA expression, B supplementation did not affect total tract digestibility or retention of phosphorus, calcium, or nitrogen.

Keywords

Boron supplementation Nutrient–gene interaction Kidney SLC4A11 Small intestine Swine 

Abbreviations

18S

18S ribosomal ribonucleic acid

B

Boron

Ca

Calcium

N

Nitrogen

NaBC1

Sodium-coupled borate carrier 1

P

Phosphorus

Notes

Disclosures

None

References

  1. 1.
    Devirian TA, Volpe SL (2003) The physiological effects of dietary boron. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 43:219–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nielsen FH (2002) The nutritional importance and pharmacological potential of boron for higher animals and human. In: Goldbach HE et al (eds) Boron in plant and animal nutrition. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp 37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Samman S, Naghill MR, Lyons Wall PM et al (1998) The nutirional and metabolic effects of boron in humans and animals. Biol Trace Elemen Res 66:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stangoulis JCR, Reid RJ (2002) Boron toxicity in plants and animals. In: Goldbach HE et al (eds) Boron in plant and animal nutrition. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp 227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hunt CD (2007) Dietary boron: evidence for essentiality and homeostatic control in humans and animals. In: Xu F et al (eds) Advances in plant and animal boron nutrition. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park M, Li Q, Shcheynikov N et al (2005) Borate transport and cell growth and proliferation—not only in plants. Cell Cycle 4:24–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parker MD, Ourmozdi EP, Tanner MJ (2001) Human BTR1, a new bicarbonate transporter superfamily member and human AE4 from kidney. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 282:1103–1109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Park M, Li Q, Shcheynikov N et al (2004) NABC1 is a ubiquitous electrogenic Na+-coupled borate transporter essential for cellular boron homeostasis and cell growth and proliferation. Mol Cell 16:331–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Armstrong TA, Spears JW (2001) Effect of dietary boron on growth performance, calcium and phosphorus metabolism, and bone mechanical properties in growing barrows. J Anim Sci 79:3120–3127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Armstrong TA, Spears JW, Crenshaw TD et al (2000) Boron supplementation of a semipurified diet for weanling pigs improves feed efficiency and bone strength characteristics and alters plasma lipid metabolites. J Nutr 130:2575–2581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    NRC (1998) Nutrient requirements of swine, 10th edn. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 110–115Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kerr BJ, Ziemer CJ, Weber TE et al (2008) Comparative analysis using thermal combustion or inductively coupled plasma methodology and mineral composition of common livestock feedstuffs. J Anim Sci 86:2377–2384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matthews JC, Wong EA, Bender PK et al (1996) Demonstration and characterization of a transport system capable of lysine and leucine absorption that is encoded in porcine jejunal epithelium by expression of mRNA in Xenopus laevis oocytes. J Anim Sci 74:127–137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Howell JA, Matthews AD, Swanson KC et al (2001) Molecular identification of high-affinity glutamate transporters in sheep and cattle forestomach, intestine, liver, kidney, and pancreas. J Anim Sci 79:1329–1336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liao SF, Harmon DL, Vanzant ES et al (2010) The small intestinal epithelia of beef steers differentially express sugar transporter messenger ribonucleic acid in response to abomasal versus ruminal infusion of starch hydrolysate. J Anim Sci 88:306–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liao SF, Vanzant ES, Harmon DL et al (2009) Ruminal and abomasal starch hydrolysate infusions selectively decrease the expression of cationic amino acid transporter mRNA by small intestinal epithelia of forage-fed beef steers. J Dairy Sci 92:1124–1135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Biosystems A (2004) Guide to performing relative quantitation of gene expression using real-time quantitative PCR. Applied Biosystems, Foster City, pp 28–30Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bustin SA (2004) A–Z of quantitative real-time PCR. International University Line, La JollaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Larionov A, Krause A, Miller W (2005) A standard curve based method for relative real time PCR data processing. BMC Bioinform 6:62–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bustin SA, Benes V, Nolan T et al (2005) Quantitative real-time RT-PCR—a perspective. J Mol Endocrinol 34:597–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liao SF, Vanzant ES, Boling JA et al (2008) Identification and expression pattern of cationic amino acid transporter-1 mRNA in small intestinal epithelia of Angus steers at four production stages. J Anim Sci 86:620–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Agudelo JH, Lindemann MD, Cromwell GL et al (2007) Virginiamycin improves phosphorus digestibility and utilization by growing-finishing pigs fed a phosphorus-deficient corn-soybean meal diet. J Anim Sci 85:2173–2182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    AOAC (1995) Official methods of analysis, 16th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    AOAC (1995) Official methods of analysis, 16th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Supplement March 1997Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    AOAC (1990) Official methods of analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Damkier HH, Nielsen S, Praetorius J (2007) Molecular expression of SLC4-derived Na+-dependent anion transporters in selected human tissues. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 293:R2136–R2146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kotka M, Lieden A, Pettersson S et al (2008) Solute carriers (SLC) in inflammatory bowel disease. A potential target of probiotics? J Clin Gastroenterol 42:S133–S135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lopez IA, Rosenblatt MI, Kim C et al (2009) SLC4A11 gene disruption in mice. Cellular targets of sensorineuronal abnormalities. J Biol Chem 284:26882–26896PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gröger N, Frohlich H, Maier H et al (2010) SLC4A11 prevents osmotic imbalance leading to corneal endothelial dystrophy, deafness, and polyuria. J Biol Chem 285:14467–14474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Clarke WB, Weber CE, Koekebakker M et al (1987) Lithium and boron in human blood. J Lab Clin Med 109:155–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Armstrong TA, Spears JW, Lloyd KE (2001) Inflammatory response, growth, and thyroid hormone concentrations are affected by long-term boron supplementation in gilts. J Anim Sci 79:1549–1556PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shengfa F. Liao
    • 1
  • James S. Monegue
    • 1
  • Merlin D. Lindemann
    • 1
  • Gary L. Cromwell
    • 1
  • James C. Matthews
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal and Food SciencesUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations