Improving Substrate Consumption and Decrease of Growth Yield in Aerobic Cultures of Pseudomonas denitrificans By Applying Low Voltages in Bioelectric Systems
It is well known that activated sludge treatment systems generate a lot of surplus sludge having environmental and economic impacts. Although several approaches have been proposed for the treatment/reuse of the excess of sludge, there are few studies focused on decreasing the biomass yield without affecting the metabolic activity. This work reports the effect of low magnitude electrical fields (0.07 to 0.2 V/cm) on the growth yield of a pure strain of Pseudomonas denitrificans (used as model microorganism). Cell potentials between 0.2 and 0.57 V were measured during 24 h to the aerobic culture; biomass production and substrate consumption were evaluated at regular intervals. Results indicated that the substrate (lactate) consumption efficiency increased with the applied potential, up to 100%, while the yield diminished 31% (0.34 g biomass/g lactate consumed) at 0.7 V vs. NHE. Bioenergetics showed that the fraction of electron equivalents toward biomass synthesis decreased from 0.68 (when no potential was applied) to 0.47 at 0.57 V, pointing out the redirection of the energy flow toward maintenance to cope with the stress caused by the imposed voltage. Therefore, the electrical stimulus could be used as control of biomass growth in aerobic wastewater treatment lines.
KeywordsActivated sludge Bioelectric reactor Bioenergetics Biomass yield Biomass control Electric field
The authors acknowledge the technical assistance of Elizabeth Cortés and Guillermo Vidriales. Y. Toriz acknowledges the scholarship provided by CONACYT to perform master studies. We also thank Alessandro Carmona for useful comments.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have conflict of interest.
- 5.Guo, W. Q., Yang, S. S., Xiang, W. S., Wang, X. J., & Ren, N. Q. (2013). Minimization of excess sludge production by in-situ activated sludge treatment processes - A comprehensive review. Biotechnology Advances, 31(8), 1386–1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.06.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Bajracharya, S., Sharma, M., Mohanakrishna, G., Dominguez Benneton, X., Strik, D. P. B. T. B., Sarma, P. M., & Pant, D. (2016). An overview on emerging bioelectrochemical systems (BESs): Technology for sustainable electricity, waste remediation, resource recovery, chemical production and beyond. Renewable Energy, 98, 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Velasco-Alvarez, N., González, I., Damian-Matsumura, P., & Gutiérrez-Rojas, M. (2011). Enhanced hexadecane degradation and low biomass production by Aspergillus niger exposed to an electric current in a model system. Bioresource Technology, 102(2), 1509–1515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Rittmann, B. E., & McCarty, P. L. (2000). Environmental biotechnology: Principles and applications (First ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- 19.APHA/AWWA/WEF. (2012). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Standard Methods, 541 ISBN 9780875532356.Google Scholar
- 21.Guo, K., Soeriyadi, A. H., Feng, H., Prévoteau, A., Patil, S. A., Gooding, J. J., & Rabaey, K. (2015). Heat-treated stainless steel felt as scalable anode material for bioelectrochemical systems. Bioresource Technology, 195, 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.060.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Cantu, J. C., Tarango, M., Beier, H. T., & Ibey, B. L. (2016). The biological response of cells to nanosecond pulsed electric fields is dependent on plasma membrane cholesterol. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Biomembranes, 1858(11), 2636–2646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Dehghani, S., Rezaee, A., & Hosseinkhani, S. (2018). Effect of alternating electrical current on denitrifying bacteria in a microbial electrochemical system: biofilm viability and ATP assessment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(33), 33591–33598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3170-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Valle, A., Zanardini, E., Abbruscato, P., Argenzio, P., Lustrato, G., Ranalli, G., & Sorlini, C. (2007). Effects of low electric current (LEC) treatment on pure bacterial cultures. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 103(5), 1376–1385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03374.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Kumar, Y., Kumar Patel, K., & Kumar, V. (2015). Pulsed electric field processing in food technology. International Journal of Engineering Studies and Technical Approach, 1(2), 6–17 ISSN 2395-0900.Google Scholar