Improvement of Methane Production from Sugar Beet Wastes Using TiO2 and Fe3O4 Nanoparticles and Chitosan Micropowder Additives
- 18 Downloads
An experimental study was performed to measure biogas production from sugar beet waste, which is, in fact, the chopped parts of the sugar beet not going through the sugar extraction process, at different additive concentrations. Medium molecular weight chitosan in microsize and TiO2 and Fe3O4 nanoparticles were added to ten experimental reactors to investigate their effect on the anaerobic digestion process. Three different concentrations of 0.01, 0.04, and 0.12% w/w were used for each additive. Biogas production and methane content were compared with a control sample containing no additive. Adding chitosan in powder form did not help the process nor improved methanogenic activities. The results showed no effect on anaerobic digestion by the addition of TiO2 nanoparticles in the mentioned concentrations, whereas adding Fe3O4 nanoparticles led to a slight increase in methane production and in volatile solid and total solid reduction. The maximum enhancement in methane and biogas production in the sample containing 0.04% Fe3O4, as compared with the control sample, reached 19.77% and 15.09%, respectively.
KeywordsBiogas TiO2 and Fe3O4 nanoparticles Chitosan powder Additives Sugar beet wastes
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Beiki, H., Soukhtanlou, E. (2018) Improvement of salt gradient solar ponds’ performance using nanoparticles inside the storage layer. J Applied Nanoscience, 9(2), 243–254.Google Scholar
- 3.Arora, L., Gupta, P., Chhikara, N., Singh, O. P., Muhunthan, N., Singh, V. N., Singh, B. P., Jain, K., Chand, S. J. A. N. (2015) Green synthesis of wurtzite copper zinc tin sulfide nanocones for improved solar photovoltaic utilization. J Applied Nanoscience, 5:163–167.Google Scholar
- 5.Li, N., Yang, F., Xiao, H., Zhang, J., & Ping, Q. (2017). Effect of feedstock concentration on biogas production by inoculating rumen microorganisms in biomass solid waste. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 1–13.Google Scholar
- 7.Keramati, M., & Beiki, H. (2017). The effect of pH adjustment together with different substrate to inoculum ratios on biogas production from sugar beet wastes in an anaerobic digester. Journal of Energy Management and Technology, 1, 6–11.Google Scholar
- 12.Iranian Sugar Factories Syndicate 2015. Available from: www.isfs.ir. Accessed 1.11.2016.
- 14.Agani, I. C., Suanon, F., Dimon, B., Ifon, E. B., Yovo, F., Wotto, V. D., Abass, O. K., & Kumwimba, M. N. (2016). Enhancement of fecal sludge conversion into biogas using iron powder during anaerobic digestion process. American Journal of Environmental Protection, 5(6), 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Suanon, F., Sun, Q., Li, M., Cai, X., Zhang, Y., Yan, Y., & Yu, C.-P. (2017). Application of nanoscale zero valent iron and iron powder during sludge anaerobic digestion: impact on methane yield and pharmaceutical and personal care products degradation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 321, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Nuntakumjorn, B., Khumsalud, W., Vetsavas, N., Sujjaviriyasup, T., & Phalakornkule, C. (2008). Comparison of sludge granule and UASB performance by adding chitosan in different forms. Chiang Mai Journal of Science, 35, 95.Google Scholar
- 28.García, A., Delgado, L., Torà, J. A., Casals, E., González, E., Puntes, V., Font, X., Carrera, J., & Sánchez, A. (2012). Effect of cerium dioxide, titanium dioxide, silver, and gold nanoparticles on the activity of microbial communities intended in wastewater treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 199, 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Federation, W. E. and Association, A. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association (APHA).Google Scholar