Reduction of Fumarate to Succinate Mediated by Fusobacterium varium
- 56 Downloads
Accumulation of succinate as a fermentation product of Fusobacterium varium was enhanced when the anaerobic bacterium was grown on complex peptone medium supplemented with fumarate. Residual substrates and fermentation products were determined by proton NMR spectroscopy. Cells collected from the fumarate-supplemented medium (8–10 h after inoculation) supported the conversion of fumarate to succinate when suspended with fumarate and a co-substrate (glucose, sorbitol, or glycerol). Succinate production was limited by the availability of fumarate or reducing equivalents supplied by catabolism of a co-substrate via the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (EMP) pathway. The choice of reducing co-substrate influenced the yield of acetate and lactate as side products. High conversions of fumarate to succinate were achieved over pH 6.6–8.2 and initial fumarate concentrations up to 300 mM. However, at high substrate concentrations, intracellular retention of succinate reduced extracellular yields. Overall, the efficient utilization of fumarate (≤ 400 mM) combined with the significant extracellular accumulation of succinate (corresponding to ≥ 70% conversion) indicated the effective utilization of fumarate as a terminal electron acceptor by F. varium and the potential of the methodology for the bioproduction of succinate.
KeywordsBiotransformation Bioconversion Fumaric acid reduction Succinic acid Fusobacterium varium Anaerobic metabolism Fermentation Cell suspensions Sorbitol Glycerol
This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC grant RGPIN/04536-2014). NMR and mass spectra were collected on instruments provided by NMR-3 and the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, respectively (Dalhousie University).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 4.Morales, M., Ataman, M., Badr, S., Linster, S., Kourlimpinis, I., Papadokonstantakis, S., Hatzimanikatis, V., & Hungerbühler, K. (2016). Sustainability assessment of succinic acid production technologies from biomass using metabolic engineering. Energy & Environmental Science, 9(9), 2794–2805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Cao, Y., Zhang, R., Sun, C., Cheng, T., Liu, Y., & Xian, M. (2013). Fermentative succinate production: An emerging technology to replace the traditional petrochemical processes. BioMed Research International. Article ID 723412. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/723412.
- 17.Cheng, K.-K., Wang, G.-Y., Zeng, J., & Zhang, J.-A. (2013). Improved succinate production by metabolic engineering. BioMed Research International. Article ID 538790. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/538790.
- 20.Kang, K.-H., Yun, J.-S., & Ryu, H.-W. (2000). Effect of culture conditions on the production of succinate by Enterococcus faecalis RKY1. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 10(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
- 24.Hofstad, T. (2006). The prokaryotes: A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria. In S. Falkow, E. Rosenberg, & K.-H. Schleifer (Eds.), The genus Fusobacterium (Vol. 7, pp. 1016–1027). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- 31.F. varium genomes. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/. Accessed 5 March 2018.
- 33.Doelle, H. W. (1975). Bacterial metabolism (2nd ed.pp. 269–270). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar