Recovery and Purity of High Molar Mass Bio-hyaluronic Acid Via Precipitation Strategies Modulated by pH and Sodium Chloride
- 90 Downloads
The effects of ethanol/broth proportions and the number of steps at varying pH in the presence or absence of sodium chloride (NaCl) were studied as precipitation strategies for the recovery and purification of high molar mass bio-hyaluronic acid (Bio-HA). Bio-HA was synthesized by Streptococcus zooepidemicus in a culture medium containing glucose and soy peptones. A single-step precipitation was more attractive than multistep precipitation in terms of recovery and purity as well as decreased use of ethanol. The best conditions in the absence and presence of salt were 2:1 ethanol/broth (v/v) at pH 4 (55.0 ± 0.2% purity and 85.0 ± 0.7% recovery) and 2:1 ethanol/broth (v/v) at pH 7 + 2 mol L−1 NaCl (59.0 ± 0.9% purity and 82.0 ± 4.3% recovery). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) spectra showed different particle sizes as a consequence of the changes in the molecular structure of HA, mainly with changes in pH. Although slight changes in distribution were observed, the average HA molar mass was not affected by the precipitation strategy, remaining on the order of 105 Da. Therefore, pH and NaCl modulated the precipitation performance of HA. These findings are relevant to further optimizing the precipitation step, thus minimizing costs in the later stages of HA purification.
KeywordsHyaluronic acid Ethanol precipitation Soy peptone Fermentation broth Downstream process
This work was supported by the following Brazilian financial institutions: Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa [CNPq-Project no: 142480/2014-2] and Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo [FAPESP–Project no: 2015/23134-8].
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 8.Scopes, R. K. (1988). Protein purification (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-verlag Inc.Google Scholar
- 11.Han, H. Y., Jang, S. H., Kim, E. C., Park, J. K., Han, Y. J., Lee, C., Park, H. S., Kim, Y. C. & Park, H. J. (2004) Patent WO2004016771.Google Scholar
- 12.Won, T. Y., Lee, C. & Seo, S. H. (2008) Patent WO2008062998.Google Scholar
- 13.Kim, T. H., Kim, H. L., Park, S. Y. & Jang, D. K. (2008) Patent US20080194810.Google Scholar
- 15.Nimrod, A., Greenman, B., Kanner, D., Landsberg, M. & Beck, Y. (1988) United States Patent 4780414.Google Scholar
- 16.Sousa, A. S., Guimarães, A. P., Gonçalves, C. V., Silva, I. J., Cavalcante, C. L., & Azevedo, D. C. S. (2009). Purification and characterization of microbial hyaluronic acid by solvent precipitation and size-exclusion chromatography. Separation Science and Technology, 44(4), 906–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Reddy, K. J., & Karunakaran, K. T. (2013). Purification and characterization of hyaluronic acid produced by Streptococcus zooepidemicus strain 3523-7. Journal of BioScience and Biotechnology, 2, 173–179.Google Scholar
- 27.Veja, J. A. (2017). Biología y bases racionales para el uso terapéutico del hialuronano en las artropatías: el tamaño es importante. J Cartillage Disease, 4, 11–18.Google Scholar