A Novel Methylotrophic Bacterial Consortium for Treatment of Industrial Effluents
Considering the importance of methylotrophs in industrial wastewater treatment, focus of the present study was on utilization of a methylotrophic bacterial consortium as a microbial seed for biotreatment of a variety of industrial effluents. For this purpose, a mixed bacterial methylotrophic AC (Ankleshwar CETP) consortium comprising of Bordetella petrii AC1, Bacillus licheniformis AC4, Salmonella subterranea AC5, and Pseudomonas stutzeri AC8 was used. The AC consortium showed efficient biotreatment of four industrial effluents procured from fertilizer, chemical and pesticide industries, and common effluent treatment plant by lowering their chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 950–2000 mg/l to below detection limit in 60–96 h in 6-l batch reactor and 9–15 days in 6-l continuous reactor. The operating variables of wastewater treatment, viz. COD, BOD, pH, MLSS, MLVSS, SVI, and F/M ratio of these effluents, were also maintained in the permissible range in both batch and continuous reactors. Therefore, formation of the AC consortium has led to the development of an efficient microbial seed capable of treating a variety of industrial effluents containing pollutants generated from their respective industries.
KeywordsChemical oxygen demand Industrial effluents Methylotrophs
Krushi Hingurao would like to acknowledge the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India, for the University Grants Commission—Research Fellowships in Science for Meritorious Students (UGC-RFSMS) fellowship during the course of this work.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 8.Jiang, B., Parshina, S., Van Doesburg, W., Lomans, B., & Stams, A. (2005). Methanomethylovorans thermophila sp. nov., a thermophilic, methylotrophic methanogen from an anaerobic reactor fed with methanol. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 55(6), 2465–2470. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63818-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Wakelin, S., Colloff, M., & Kookana, R. (2008). Effect of wastewater treatment plant effluent on microbial function and community structure in the sediment of a freshwater stream with variable seasonal flow. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74(9), 2659–2668. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02348-07.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Holt, J., Krieg, N., Sneath, P., Staley, J., & Williams, S. (1994). Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology (9th ed.). USA: Williams & Wilkins Press.Google Scholar
- 14.Balachandar, D., Raja, P., & Sundaram, S. (2008). Genetic and metabolic diversity of pink-pigmented facultative methylotrophs in phyllosphere of tropical plants. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 39(1), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822008000100017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Maiti, S. (2004). Handbook of methods in environmental studies—water and wastewater analysis, vol. 1 (p. 307). New Delhi: Oxford Book Company.Google Scholar
- 17.Barbera, M., Mateo, E., Monkaityte, R., & Constanti, M. (2011). Biodegradation of methyl tert-butyl ether by newly identified soil microorganisms in a simple mineral solution. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 27(4), 813–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0522-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Bulygina, E., Galchenko, V., Govorukhina, N., Netrusov, A., Nikitin, D., Trotsenko, Y., & Chumakov, K. (1990). Taxonomic studies on methylotrophic bacteria by 5S ribosomal RNA sequencing. Journal of General Microbiology, 136(3), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-136-3-441.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Srinivas, T. (2008). Environmental biotechnology (p. 113). New Delhi: New Age International.Google Scholar
- 21.Durai, G., Rajamohan, N., Karthikeyan, C., & Rajasimman, M. (2010). Kinetics studies on biological treatment of tannery wastewater using mixed culture. IJCBE., 3, 105–109.Google Scholar
- 22.Omer, A. (2012). Production of organic biofertilizer from olive mill waste water. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6, 654–663.Google Scholar
- 23.Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F., & Stensel, H. (2003). Suspended growth biological treatment processes. In G. Tchobanoglous, F. Burton, & H. Stensel (Eds.), Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse (4th ed., pp. 659–886). New York: Metcalf & Eddy, Inc..Google Scholar
- 25.Jilani, S., & Khan, M. (2013). Biological treatment of industrial wastewater using biosimulator. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 13, 124–132.Google Scholar
- 26.Baytshtok, V., Kim, S., Yu, R., Park, H., & Chandran, K. (2008). Molecular and biokinetic characterization of methylotrophic denitrification using nitrate and nitrite as terminal electron acceptors. Water Science and Technology, 58(2), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.391.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Hallin, S., Throback, I., Dicksved, J., & Pell, M. (2006). Metabolic profiles and genetic diversity of denitrifying communities in activated sludge after addition of methanol or ethanol. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(8), 5445–5452. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00809-06.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 28.Sharifi-Yazdi, M., Azimi, C., & Khalili, M. (2001). Study of the biological treatment of industrial waste water by the activated sludge unit. Iranian Journal Public Health., 30, 87–90.Google Scholar