A Novel α-Amylase from Bacillus mojavensis A21: Purification and Biochemical Characterization
- 356 Downloads
α-Amylase from Bacillus mojavensis A21 (BMA.2) was purified to homogeneity by ultrafiltration, Sephadex G-75 gel filtration and Sepharose mono Q anion exchange chromatography, with a 15.3-fold increase in specific activity and 11% recovery. The molecular weight of the BMA.2 enzyme was estimated to be 58 kDa by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and gel filtration. The optimum temperature and pH were 80 °C and 6.5, respectively. BMA.2 belonged to the EDTA-sensitive α-amylase, but its activity was not stimulated by the presence of Ca2+ ions. The major end-products of starch hydrolysis were maltohexaose, maltopentaose and maltotriose. The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the first ten amino acids of the purified α-amylase was ASVNGTLMQY. Compared to sequences of other amylases, the ten amino acid sequence contains Val at position 3, while amylases from Bacillus licheniformis NH1 and Bacillus sp. SG-1 have Leu and Thr at position 3, respectively.
Keywordsα-Amylase B. mojavensis A21 Purification Biochemical characterization
This work was funded by the Ministry of Higher Education, Scientific Research and Technology-Tunisia. The authors would like to thank Mr A. Hajji from the Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences of Kairouan for his help with English.
- 15.Miller, J. H. (1972). Experiments in Moleculer Genetics (pp. 431–435). Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
- 20.Tebo, B., Ferriera, S., Johnson, J., Kravitz, S., Beeson, K., Sutton, G., Rogers, Y.H., Friedman, R., Frazier, M. & Venter, J.C Accession NZ_ABCF01000001, EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ databases (2007). Bacillus sp. SG-1, whole genome sequence.Google Scholar
- 21.Gray, G. L., Mainzer, S. E., Rey, M. W., Lamsa, M. H., Kindle, K. L., Carmona, C., et al. (1986). Journal of Bacteriology, 166, 635–643.Google Scholar
- 22.Kuhn, H., Fietzek, P. P., & Lampen, J. O. (1982). Journal of Bacteriology, 149, 372–373.Google Scholar
- 23.Hayashida, S., Teramoto, Y., & Inoue, T. (1988). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 54, 1516–1522.Google Scholar
- 25.Buisson, G., Duee, D., Haser, R., & Payan, F. (1987). EMBO Journal, 6, 3909–3916.Google Scholar
- 29.Morgan, F. J., & Priest, F. G. (1981). Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 50, 107–114.Google Scholar
- 30.Igarashi, K., Hatada, Y., Hagihara, H., Saeki, K., Takaiwa, M., Uemura, T., et al. (1998). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64, 3282–3289.Google Scholar