Liquid hot water pretreatment of olive tree pruning residues
- 141 Downloads
Olive tree pruning generates an abundant, renewable lignocellulose residue, which is usually burnt on fields to prevent propagation of vegetal diseases, causing economic costs and environmental concerns. As a first step in an alternative use to produce fuel ethanol, this work is aimed to study the pretreatment of olive tree pruning residues by liquid hot water. Pretreatment was carried out at seven temperature levels in the range 170–230°C for 10 or 60 min. Sugar recoveries in both solid and liquid fractions resulting from pretreatment as well as enzymatic hydrolysis yield of the solid were used to evaluate pretreatment performance. Results show that the enzyme accessibility of cellulose in the pretreated solid fraction increased with pretreatment time and temperature, although sugar degradation in the liquid fraction was concomitantly higher.
Index EntriesBiomass enzymatic hydrolysis ethanol liquid hot water pretreatment olive tree residues glucose
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Van Walsum, G. P., Allen, S. G., Spencer, M. J., Laser, M. S., Antal, M. J., and Lynd, L. R. (1996), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 57–58, 157–169.Google Scholar
- 5.Allen, S. G., Kam, L. C., Zemann, A. J., and Antal, M. J., Jr. (1996), Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35, 2705–2715.Google Scholar
- 6.FAO (2006), http://faostat.fao.org/faostat. Accessed May 20, 2004.Google Scholar
- 7.Sánchez, S., Moya, A. J., Moya, M., et al. (2002), Ing. Quím. 34, 194–202.Google Scholar
- 9.National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Chemical analysis and testing laboratory analytical procedures. LAP-002 (1996). LAP-003 (1995). LAP-004 (1996). LAP-005 (1994). LAP-010 (1994) and LAP-017 (1998). NREL, Golden, CO, USA. http://www.eere.energy.gov/biomass/analytical_procedures.html. Accessed May 20, 2004.Google Scholar
- 12.Zimbardi, F., Ricci, E., Viola, E., Cuna, D., Cardinale, G., and Cardinale, M. (2001), First World Conference on Biomass for Energy and Industry, vol. 2, James & James, London, pp. 1525–1528.Google Scholar