Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology

, Volume 148, Issue 1–3, pp 261–270 | Cite as

What can be Learned from Silage Breeding Programs?

Article

Abstract

Improving the quality of cellulosic ethanol feedstocks through breeding and genetic manipulation could significantly impact the economics of this industry. Attaining this will require comprehensive and rapid characterization of large numbers of samples. There are many similarities between improving corn silage quality for dairy production and improving feedstock quality for cellulosic ethanol. It was our objective to provide insight into what is needed for genetic improvement of cellulosic feedstocks by reviewing the development and operation of a corn silage breeding program. We discuss the evolving definition of silage quality and relate what we have learned about silage quality to what is needed for measuring and improving feedstock quality. In addition, repeatability estimates of corn stover traits are reported for a set of hybrids. Repeatability of theoretical ethanol potential measured by near-infrared spectroscopy is high, suggesting that this trait may be easily improved through breeding. Just as cell wall digestibility has been factored into the latest measurements of silage quality, conversion efficiency should be standardized and included in indices of feedstock quality to maximize overall, economical energy availability.

Keywords

Silage breeding Corn stover Repeatability Quality 

References

  1. 1.
    Service, R. F. (2007). Science, 315, 1488–1491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wyman, C. E. (2007). Trends in Biotechnology, 25, 153–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant (2nd ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coors, J. G., & Lauer, J. G. (2001). In A. R. Hallauer (Ed.) Specialty corns pp. 347–392. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ragauskas, A. J., Williams, C. K., Davison, B. H., Britovsek, G., Cairney, J., Eckert, C. A., et al. (2006). Science, 311, 484–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Allen, M. S., Coors, J. G., & Roth, G. W. (2003). In D. R. Buxton, R. E. Muck, & J. H. Harrison (Eds.) Silage science and technology pp. 547–608. Madison, WI: ASA–CSSA–SSSA.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lauer, J. G., Coors, J. G., & Flannery, P. J. (2001). Crop Science, 41, 1449–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Undersander, D. J., Howard, W. T., & Shaver, R. D. (1993). Journal of Production Agriculture, 6, 231–235.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiss, W. P. (1994). In G. C. Fahey (Ed.) Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization pp. 644–681. Madison, WI: ASA–CSSA–SSSA.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mertens, D. R. (1987). Journal of Animal Science, 64, 1548–1558.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oba, M., & Allen, M. S. (1999). Journal of Dairy Science, 82, 589–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwab, E. C., Shaver, R. D., Lauer, J. G., & Coors, J. G. (2003). Journal of Animal Feed Science and Technology, 109, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shaver, R. D. (2006). Corn silage evaluation: MILK2000 challenges and opportunities with MILK2006. Available at: http://www.wisc.edu/dysci/uwex/nutritn/pubs/milk2006weblinktext.pdf.
  14. 14.
    Lauer, J., Kohn, K., & Flannery, P. J. (2005). Wisconsin corn hybrid performance trials grain and silage. University of Wisconsin Ext. Publ. A3653. Available at: http://corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/HT/2005/Text.htm.
  15. 15.
    Coors, J. G. (2007). UW corn silage breeding program. Available: http://www.silagebreeding.agronomy.wisc.edu/Corn/corn_home.htm.
  16. 16.
    Jung, H. G., Mertens, D. R., & Buxton, D. R. (1998). Crop Science, 38, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hames, B. R., Thomas, S. R., Sluiter, A. D., Roth, C. J., & Templeton, D. W. (2003). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 105, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lessells, C. M., & Boag, P. T. (1987). Auk, 104, 116–121.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Duvick, D. N., Smith, J. S. C., & Cooper, M. (2004). Plant Breeding Reviews, 24, 109–151.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Justen, B. (2004). M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AgronomyUniversity of Wisconsin—MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations