Advertisement

Annals of Ophthalmology

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 205–208 | Cite as

Prevalence of general dysfunctions in binocular vision

  • Robert Montés-Micó
Original Article

Abstract

A 1-year clinical trial to determine the prevalence of general dysfunctions in binocular vision in a nonpresbyopic population was conducted in 1679 subjects aged 18 to 38 years. A thorough eye examination included binocular vision testing. A high prevalence of binocular vision dysfunctions was found. Of the subjects, 56.2% presented symptoms of binocular dysfunctions, 61.4% with accommodation disorders and 38.6% vergence disorders. Accommodation insufficiency was most prevalent among those with symptoms (11.4%).

Keywords

Binocular Vision Asthenopia Uncorrected Refractive Error General Dysfunction Subjective Refraction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hokoda SC. General binocular dysfunctions in an urban optometry clinic. J Am Optom Assoc. 1985;56:560–562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Purcell LR, Nuffer JS, Clements SD, et al. The cost effectiveness of selected optometric procedures. J Am Optom Assoc. 1983;54:643–647.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennett GR, Blondin M, Ruskiewicz J. Incidence and prevalence of selected visual conditions. J Am Optom Assoc. 1982;53:647–656.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Griffin JR. Binocular Anomalies: Procedures for Vision Therapy. 2nd ed. Chicago, Ill: Professional Press; 1982: chap 1.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grisham D. The dynamics of fusional vergence eye movement in binocular dysfunction. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980;57:645–655.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoffman L, Cohen AH, Feuer G. Effectiveness of non-strabismus optometric vision training in a private practice. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1973;50:813–816.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pickwel LD. Binocular Vision Anomalies: Investigation and Treatment. 2nd ed. London, England: Butterworth; 1989.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Regan D. Binocular vision. In: Regan D, ed. Vision and Visual Dysfunction. London, England: MacMillan Press; 1991:46–70.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daum KM. Accommodative dysfunctions. Doc Ophthalmol. 1983; 55:177–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daum KM. Characteristics of exodeviations: II. Changes with treatment with orthoptics. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986;63:244–251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Benjamin, WJ. Fusion and binocularity. 1st ed. In: Clinical Refraction. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1998:255–278.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grosvenor T. Anomalies of refraction and binocular vision. In: Grosvenor T, ed. Primary Care Optometry. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1996.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical Management of Binocular Vision: Heterophoric Accommodative, and Eye Movement Disorders. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott Co; 1994:3–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Montés-Micó
    • 1
  1. 1.Optometry and Vision Sciences Unit, Optics DepartmentUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations