Advertisement

Algorithmic strategy for optimizing product design considering the production costs

  • Oussama AdjoulEmail author
  • Khaled Benfriha
  • Améziane Aoussat
Original Paper
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

This article describes a new interactive design approach integrating the constraints associated with production include manufacturing and assembling. The proposed method, in the form of an algorithm, allows optimisation of product design by minimizing production costs at each iteration, without compromising its functionality. The novelty of this algorithm in terms of modeling and optimisation of production costs in the design phase is its ability to dynamically evaluate the cumulative costs of production as a function of design and procedural choices. The availability of this information first allows the identification of design points and/or procedural points that generate significant production costs, and second, suggests improvements and recommendations that aim to optimize production costs. These experiments were conducted at a smart factory installed in our organisation. The proposed algorithm involves four steps. To optimise production costs, the designer must input all of the required data into the simulation and thereby identify the most significant cost elements to optimise. Then, the designer uses the suggested recommendation list to modify the relevant design and/or manufacturing parameters, thus obtaining the new, optimised production costs. If the first result is unsatisfactory, other iterations can be performed.

Keywords

Design Manufacturing Iterative algorithm Optimization of production costs Dynamic modeling Smart factory 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Karre, H., Hammer, M., Kleindienst, M., Ramsauer, C.: Transition towards an Industry 4.0 State of the LeanLab at Graz University of Technology. Procedia Manuf. 9, 206–213 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Synnes, E.L., Welo, T.: Enhancing integrative capabilities through lean product and process development. Procedia CIRP 54, 221–226 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yann-Guirec, M., Khaled, B., Améziane, A.: Life cycle cost through reliability. In: Zamojski, W., Mazurkiewicz, J., Sugier, J., Walkowiak, T., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) New results in dependability and computer systems, pp. 523–530. Springer, Switzerland (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Etienne, A., et al.: Cost engineering for variation management during the product and process development. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. IJIDeM 11(2), 289–300 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Audoux, K., Segonds, F., Kerbrat, O., Aoussat, A.: Toward a customized multicriterion tool for product evaluation in the early design phases: the CMDET methodology. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00549-8 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alsyouf, I., Al-Alami, A., Saidam, A.: Implementing product design development methodology for assessing and improving the performance of products. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. IJIDeM 9(3), 225–234 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nadeau, J.-P., Fischer, X.: Research in Interactive Design. Virtual, Interactive and Integrated Product Design and Manufacturing for Industrial Innovation, vol. 3. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumar, U., Markeset, T.: Product support strategy: conventional versus functional products. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 11(1), 53–67 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Markeset, T., Kumar U.: R&M and risk-analysis tools in product design, to reduce life-cycle cost and improve attractiveness. In: 2001 Proceedings on Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No. 01CH37179), pp. 116–122. Philadelphia, PA, USA, (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boothroyd, G., Radovanovic, P.: Estimating the cost of machined components during the conceptual design of a product. CIRP Ann. 38(1), 157–160 (1989)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P., Knight, W.A., Dewhurst, P., Knight, W.A.: Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly, Revised and Expanded. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Evbuomwan, N.F.O., Sivaloganathan, S., Jebb, A.: Concurrent Materials and Manufacturing Process Selection in Design Function Deployment. Concurr. Eng. 3(2), 135–144 (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feng, S.C., Song, E.Y.: Information modeling of conceptual process planning integrated with conceptual design. In: The 5th design for manufacturing conference, The 2000 ASME design engineering technical conferences, Baltimore, Maryland, Paper Number DETC00/DFM-14009, 10–13 September 2000Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Segonds, F., Cohen, G., Véron, P., Peyceré, J.: PLM and early stages collaboration in interactive design, a case study in the glass industry. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. IJIDeM 10(2), 95–104 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, J., Ma, Y.: A survey of manufacturing oriented topology optimization methods. Adv. Eng. Softw. 100, 161–175 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jung, J.-Y.: Manufacturing cost estimation for machined parts based on manufacturing features. J. Intell. Manuf. 13(4), 227–238 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elgh, F., Cederfeldt, M.: Concurrent cost estimation as a tool for enhanced producibility—system development and applicability for producibility studies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 109(1), 12–26 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Niazi, A., Dai, J.S., Balabani, S., Seneviratne, L.: Product cost estimation: technique classification and methodology review. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 128(2), 563–575 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lukic, D., Milosevic, M., Antic, A., Borojevic, S., Ficko, M.: Multi-criteria selection of manufacturing processes in the conceptual process planning. Adv. Prod. Eng. Manag. 12(2), 151–162 (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Molcho, G., Cristal, A., Shpitalni, M.: Part cost estimation at early design phase. CIRP Ann. 63(1), 153–156 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luki, D., Miloševi, M., Borojevi, S.: Manufacturing cost estimation in the conceptual process planning. Mach. Des. 8(3), 83–90 (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chang, K.-H.: Product Manufacturing and Cost Estimating using CAD/CAE: The Computer Aided Engineering Design Series. Academic Press, London (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Griese, D., Namouz, E., Shankar, P., Summers, J. D., Mocko, G.: Application of a lightweight engineering tool: lazy parts analysis and redesign of a remote controlled car, pp. 839–847 (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li, R.-K., Hwang, C.-L.: A framework for automatic DFA system development. Comput. Ind. Eng. 22(4), 403–413 (1992)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shehab, E.: An intelligent knowledge based cost modelling system for innovative product development (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Creese, R.: Introduction to Manufacturing Processes and Materials. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Giachetti, R.E.: A decision support system for material and manufacturing process selection. J. Intell. Manuf. 9(3), 265–276 (1998)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yu, J.-C., Krizan, S., Ishii, K.: Computer-aided design for manufacturing process selection. J. Intell. Manuf. 4(3), 199–208 (1993)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xu, X., Wang, L., Newman, S.T.: Computer-aided process planning—a critical review of recent developments and future trends. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 24(1), 1–31 (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Orji, I.J., Wei, S.: Reducing total costs of machined parts through green manufacturing. Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 30(5), 289–305 (2016)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Samant, A.: Laser machining of structural ceramics: computational and experimental (2019). (Online) https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/99/. Accessed 17 Jan 2019
  32. 32.
    Duverlie, P., Castelain, J.M.: Cost estimation during design step: parametric method versus case based reasoning method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 15(12), 895–906 (1999)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gao, Q., Lizarazo-Adarme, J., Paul, B.K., Haapala, K.R.: An economic and environmental assessment model for microchannel device manufacturing: part 2—Application. J. Clean. Prod. 120, 146–156 (2016)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Duflou, J.R., Kellens, K., Renaldi, Y., Guo, W.Dewulf: Critical comparison of methods to determine the energy input for discrete manufacturing processes. CIRP Ann. 61(1), 63–66 (2012)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lwin, T., Lin, T., Lee, J.: Integrated approach for rotor blade manufacturing cost estimate. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 83(4), 235–244 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire de Conception de Produits et InnovationArts et Métiers ParisTechParisFrance

Personalised recommendations