Advertisement

PLM and early stages collaboration in interactive design, a case study in the glass industry

  • Frédéric SegondsEmail author
  • Guillaume Cohen
  • Philippe Véron
  • Josquin Peyceré
Original Paper

Abstract

Product design activity is traditionally presented as a succession of four to six stages. In the early stages of design, during the search for concepts, multi-disciplinary teams are working together, sometimes on the fringe of the digital design chain. But it is during these stages, that most of the product development cost is committed. Therefore, collaboration should be emphasized, and PLM software should contribute to it strongly. This paper first defines the boundaries of the early stages of design. Then, we analyze designer collaboration in this stage and describe the knowledge necessary for efficient collaboration. Finally, we propose and test a concept for a tool to assist the early stages of design, to be integrated in a continuum with other existing digital design tools. A case study is presented in Verallia, specialized in the design and manufacturing of glassware.

Keywords

Early interactive design PLM  Collaborative work 

References

  1. 1.
    3DS: Inspired people boosting innovation for design excellence [Online]. Available: http://www.3ds.com/design-studio (2010)
  2. 2.
    Amann, K.: Product Lifecycle Management : Empowering the Future of Business. CimData, Ann Arbor (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Birkhofer, H., Jänsch, J., Kloberdanz, H.: An extensive and detailed view of the application of design methods and methodology in industry. In: International Conference on Engineering Design, 15–18 August 2005 2005 Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blanco, E., Boujut, J.F., Degrave, A., Charpentier, P., Ris, G., Bennis, F., Martin, F.O., Petiot, J.F., Deniaud, S., Garro, O., Micaëlli, J.P.: A distant collaborative design experiment. Mecanique et Industries 3, 153 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blomberg, J., Giacomi, J., Mosher, A., Swenton-WALL, P.: Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In: Schuler, D., Namioka, A. (eds.) Participatory design: Principles and practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bouchard, C., Camous, R., Aoussat, A.: Nature and role of intermediate representations (IR) in the design process: case studies in car design. Int. J. Veh. Des. 38, 1–25 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bruno, F., Muzzupappa, M.: Product interface design: a participatory approach based on virtual reality. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 68, 254–269 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, X.L., Fuh, J.Y.H., Wong, Y.S., Lu, Y.Q., Li, W.D., Qiu, Z.M.: An adaptable model for distributed collaborative design. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 2, 47–55 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eder, W.E.: Design modeling—a design science approach (and why does industry not use it?). J. Eng. Des. 9, 355–371 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garetti, M., Terzi, S., Bertacci, N., Brianza, M.: Organisational change and knowledge management in PLM implementation. Int. J. Product Lifecycle Manage. 1, 43–51 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Howard, T.J., Culley, S.J., Dekoninck, E.: Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Des. Stud. 29, 160–180 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johansen, R.: Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams. The Free Press, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lau, H.Y.K., Mak, K.L., Lu, M.T.H.: A virtual design platform for interactive product design and visualization. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 139, 402–407 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 140, 1–55 (1932)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maranzana, N., Segonds, F., Lesage, F., Nelson, J.: Collaborative design tools: a comparison between free software and PLM solutions in engineering education. In: 9th International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management - PLM’12. Montréal (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Micaëlli, J.P., Forest, J.: Artificialisme, introduction à une théorie de la conception, Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merlo, C., Couture, N.: A user-centered approach for a tabletop-based collaborative design environment. Strojniski Vestnik/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 56, 754–764 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nadeau, J.-P., Fischer, X.: Research in Interactive Design. In: Virtual, Interactive and Integrated Product Design and Manufacturing for Industrial Innovation, vol. 3. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Harcourt Science and Technology Company, San Diego (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.H.: Engineering Design—A systematic approach. Springer, Londres (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prasad, B.: Concurrent engineering fundamentals—integrated product and process organization. Prentice Hall, London (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schuh, G., Rozenfeld, H., Assmus, D., Zancul, E.: Process oriented framework to support PLM implementation. Comput. Ind. 59, 210–218 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Segonds, F.: Contribution to the integration of a collaborative design environment in the early stages of design. PhD , Arts et Metiers ParisTech (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Segonds, F., Mantelet, F., Maranzana, N., Gaillard, S.: Early stages of apparel design: how to define collaborative needs for PLM and fashion? Int. J. Fash. Des. Technol. Educ. pp. 1–10 (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sohlenius, G.: Concurrent engineering. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 41, 645–655 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sudarsan, R., Fenves, S.J., Sriram, R.D., Wang, F.: A product information modeling framework for product lifecycle management. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 37, 1399 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tomiyama, T., Gu, P., Jin, Y., Lutters, D., Kind, C., Kimura, F.: Design methodologies: industrial and educational applications. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 2009(09), 003 (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tseng, K., Abdalla, H., Shehab, E.: A Web-based integrated design system: its applications on conceptual design stage. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 35, 1028 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ullman, D.G., Jones, E.A.: The Mechanical Design Process. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Winner, R. I., Pennell, J. P., Bertrand, H. E., Slusarczuk, M.M.: The Role of Concurrent Engineering in Weapons System Acquisition. In: I. R. (ed) Institute for Defense Analyses, p. 338. Alexandria Va (1988)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yesilbas, L.G., Lombard, M.: Towards a knowledge repository for collaborative design process: focus on conflict management. Comput. Ind. 55, 335 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frédéric Segonds
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guillaume Cohen
    • 2
  • Philippe Véron
    • 3
  • Josquin Peyceré
    • 4
  1. 1.Arts et Metiers ParisTech, LCPIParisFrance
  2. 2.Universitè Paul Sabatier Toulouse 3, ICA, bat 3R1 ToulouseFrance
  3. 3.Arts et Metiers ParisTech, LSISAix-en-ProvenceFrance
  4. 4.Verallia, rue André ChénierChalon-sur-SaôneFrance

Personalised recommendations