Managing design change order in a PLM platform using a CSP approach

  • Guillaume Ducellier
  • Pierre-Alain Yvars
  • Benoît Eynard
Original Paper
  • 287 Downloads

Abstract

This paper focuses on the impact of Design Change Orders (DCO) on the product data into a PLM platform. In a context of concurrent engineering, we concentrate on the management of product data associated to the product structure. As PLM platform architecture is not fully adapted to conduct DCO on the product data, we propose a specific approach for facilitating DCO execution and comprehension. In this context, a constraint based approach is proposed. The aim of this approach is to provide a view of all the product data concerned by the DCO at the beginning of the DCO process. Based on this view, called product data constraint graph, the project leader can assign the corresponding resources to the DCO process. An example illustrates the benefits of our proposition and the first results concerning this underdevelopment approach are presented.

Keywords

Product lifecycle management (PLM) Constraint satisfaction problems (CSP) Design change order (DCO) 

References

  1. 1.
    Balakrshnan, G.: Product Data Management implementation in Indian industries—an impact on technology adoption. PhD thesis, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Anna University, Chennai, India (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergsjö, D., Malmqvist, J., Ström, M.: Architectures for mechatronic product data integration in PLM systems. In: Proceedings of the International Design Conference—Design’06, Dubrovnik, Croatia (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ducellier, G., Charles, S., Eynard, B., Caillaud, E.: Traceability of simulation data in a PLM Environment: proposition of Step-based system that support parameter integration. In: Proceedings of the International Design Conference—DESIGN’06, Dubrovnik, Croatia (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ducellier, G., Charles, S., Eynard, B., Caillaud, E.: Rule based specification for collaborative design. In: 5th International Conference on Advanced Engineering Design—AED 2006, Prague, Czech Republic (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ducellier, G., Eynard, B., Caillaud, E.: Integration of CAD knowledge with PLM: application to product development process during requirements clarification and detailed design phases. In: International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management—PLM 2006, Bangalore, India (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, E.: Constraint propagation with interval labels. Artif. Intell. 24(3), 205–280 (1987)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eynard, B., Gallet, T., Nowak, P., Roucoules, L.: UML based specifications of PDM product structure and workflow. Comput. Ind. 55, 301–316 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Falting, B.: Arc consistency for continuous variables. Artif. Intell. 65(2), 363–376 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fischer, X., Coutellier, D.: Research in interactive design. Springer, Paris (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fu, Q., Zhang, S.S.: Product development process management system based on P\_PROCE model. Concur. Eng. Res. Appl. 10(3), 203–211 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, C.H., Weston, R.H., Hodgson, A., Lee, K.H.: The complementary use of IDEF and UML approaches. Comput. Ind. 50(1), 35–56 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Legardeur, J., Merlo, C., Fischer, X.: An integrated information system for product design assistance based on artificial intelligence and collaborative tools. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. 1(3), 211–229 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lhomme, O.: Consistency techniques for numeric CSPs. In: 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 232–238, Chambéry, France (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zimmer, L.: CO\(_2\) project. In: Proceedings of S3P seminar, Bayonne (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mackworth, A.K.: Consistency in networks of relations. Artif. Intell. 8(1), 99–118 (1977)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moore, R.E.: Interval analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1966)MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Montanari, U.: Networks of constraints: fundamental properties and applications to picture processing. Inf. Sci. 7, 95–132 (1974)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dika A.N., Ducellier G., Eynard B., Lafon P., Deneux D.: From workflow specification to implementation: an industrial use case. In: International Design Conference 2008—Design’2008, May 19–23, Dubrovnik, Croatia (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sellini, F., Yvars, P.A.: Veri-Komod: verification of knowledge models in the mechanical design field. In: 11th European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop—EKAW’99, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sébastian, P., Chenouard, R., Nadeau, J.-P., Fischer, X.: The embodiment design constraint satisfaction problem of the BOOTSTRAP facing interval analysis and genetic algorithm based decision support tools. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 1(2), 99–106 (June 2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Solhenius, G.: Concurrent engineering. Ann. CIRP 41(2), 645–655 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Subrahmanian, E., Rachuri, S., Fenves, S.J., Foufou, S., Sriram, R.D.: Product lifecycle management support: a challenge in supporting product design and manufacturing in a networked economy. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. 1(1), 4–25 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stark, J.: Product lifecycle management: 21st century paradigm for product realization. Springler, London (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tichkiewitch, S.: De la CFAO à la conception intégrée. Int. J. CAD/CAM Comput. Graph. 9(5), 609–621 (1994)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Waltz, D.: Generating semantic descriptions from drawings of scenes with shadows. MIT, Massachusetts (1972) Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yvars, P.A., Sellini, F.: Komod: a constraint based design support system for mechanical engineering. In: International CIRP Design Seminar CIRP’99, Enschede, Netherlands (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guillaume Ducellier
    • 1
  • Pierre-Alain Yvars
    • 2
  • Benoît Eynard
    • 3
  1. 1.UTT, ICD-LASMISTroyes CedexFrance
  2. 2.SUPMECA, LISMMASaint-Ouen CedexFrance
  3. 3.Département GSMUTCCompiègne CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations