Actors’ networks management for design co-ordination

Short Original Paper

Abstract

In a worldwide context of collaborative development of new products and/or services, companies have to control the design process to increase design performance. Formal and informal networks of actors are activated during the very first phases of product development projects in order to define the company’s partners in a more efficient way. Our goal is to study relationships between co-design projects and networks of partners in order to help project managers in setting up design teams. This leads to the identification of several drivers which influence the actors’ network use and leading. Drivers such as project organisational structure, concurrent engineering techniques, groupware-like and knowledge-based systems support and enhance such networks. We will base our experimental issues on an industrial case study from energy production sector. This industrial case explores the structure and the management of actors’ networks.

Keywords

Co-design Actors’ network Collaboration evaluation Design co-ordination Engineering design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arend R.: Implications for including shared strategic control in multi-party relationship models. Eur. Manag. J. 24(1), 38–48 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Everaere C.: Les collectifs de travail: une réalité difficile à cerner et soumise à contraintes. Perform. Humaines Tech. 96, 6–19 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zolghadri, M., Baron, C., Girard, Ph.: Innovative product and Value network co-design: context, problematic and some exploratory results. Virtual Concept 2006 Playa Del Carmen, Mexico (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alter C., Hage J.: Organisations Working Together. Sage, Beverley Hills (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liker, J.K.: The Toyota Way. McGraw-Hill, NY (2004). ISBN: 0071392319Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Womack J.P., Jones D.T.: Lean Thinking. Free Press, NY (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shore B., Venkatachalam A.R.: Evaluating the information sharing capabilities of supply chain partners: afuzzy logic model. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 33(9), 804–824 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Girard Ph., Doumeingts G.: Modelling of the engineering design system to improve performance. Comput. Ind. Eng. 46(1), 43–67 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Merlo C., Girard Ph.: Information system modelling for engineering design co-ordination. Comput. Ind. 55(3), 317–334 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balbontin A., Yazdani B.B., Cooper R., Souder W.E.: New product development practices in American and British firms. Technovation 20, 257–274 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coates G., Whitfield R.I., Duffy A.H.B., Hills B.: Co-ordination approaches and systems. Part II. An operational perspective. Res. Eng. Des. 12, 73–89 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martinez M.T., Fouletier P., Park K.H., Favrel J.: Virtual enterprise—organisation, evolution and control. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 74, 225–238 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Giannini F., Monti M., Biondi D., Bonfatti F., Moanari P.D.: A modelling tool for the management of product data in a co-design environment. Comput Aided Des 34, 1063–1073 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wognum N., Fischer O., Weenink S.: Balanced relationships: management of client-supplier relationships in product development. Technovation 22(6), 341–351 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krackhardt D., Hanson J.: Informal networks: the company behind the chart. Harv. Bus. Rev. 71(4), 104–111 (1993)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krackhardt, D.: Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. In: Carley, K.M., Prietula, M.J. (eds) Computational Organizational Theory, pp. 89–111. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass Publishers, Mahwah (1994). ISBN: 080581406Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Callon M.: Actor-Network Theory, The Market Test. In: Law, J., Hassard, J. (eds) The sociological Review, pp. 181–195. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roozenburg N.F., Eeckels J.: Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods. Wiley, NY (1995)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schön D.: Apprentissage organisationnel et épistémologie de la pratique. In: Reynaud, B. (eds) Les Limites de la rationalité t.2., La Découverte, Paris (1997)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tarondeau J.C., Wright R.W.: La transversalité dans les organisations ou le contrôle par les processus. Revue Française de Gestion 104, 112–121 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESTIABidartFrance
  2. 2.Tecnologico de MonterreyCampus MonterreyMonterreyMexico
  3. 3.IMS/LAPS LaboratoryBordeaux UniversityTalenceFrance

Personalised recommendations