A knowledge-based workflow to dynamically manage human interaction in extended enterprise

  • Maura Mengoni
  • Serena Graziosi
  • Marco Mandolini
  • Margherita Peruzzini
Original Paper


Extended enterprises require novel modes of organizing companies and managing collaboration. Although the promise of Information Communication Technologies to connect people, processes and information, it is worth to notice that current implementations are strongly document-oriented and do not enable flexible workflow management overcoming well-known inter-enterprise integration difficulties. The long-term goal of the research is the study of a new methodology and the development of dedicated software tools to facilitate the dynamic collaboration among 21 companies participating to a research project, funded by the Italian Economic Ministry, called CO-ENV. The definition of dynamic workflow system architecture represents the step forwards the implementation of a collaborative platform. Preliminary benchmarking of available systems and techniques, the product development process analysis of the project participant companies and a possible structure of the system are well illustrated. Examples of expected and unexpected exceptions are reported and differences between static and dynamic workflow management systems are discussed.


Dynamic workflow Design process Product innovation Product lifecycle management Extended enterprise 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Adams, M.J., Edmond, D., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: The application of activity theory to dynamic workflow adaptation issues. In 7th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Adelaide (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aziz H., Gao J., Maropoulos P., Cheung W.M.: Open standard, open source and peer-to-peer tools and methods for collaborative product development. Comput. Ind. 56, 260–271 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alonso, G., Gunthor, R., Agrawal, D., El Addadi, A., Mohan, C.: Exotica/FMDC: handling disconnected clients in a workflow management system. In: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, Vienna (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adams, M.J., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Dynamic and extensible exception handling for workflows: a service-oriented implementation. BPM Center Report, BPM-07-03, http://BPMcenter.org (2007)
  5. 5.
    Adams, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Facilitating flexibility and dynamic exception handling in workflows through worklets. In: Proceedings 17th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE’05) Forum, Porto, pp. 45–50 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bryan-Kinns, N., Healey, P.G.T., Leach, J.: Exploring mutual engagement in creative collaborations. In: The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creativity and Cognition, ACM Press, Washington (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Belkadi F., Troussier N., Eynard B., Bonjour E.: Collaboration based on product lifecycles interoperability for extended enterprise. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 4(3), 169–179 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cichocki A., Helal A., Rusinkiewicz M., Woelk D.: Workflow and process automation: concepts and technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D’Averni R.A.: Hyper competition—Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Manoeuvring. The Free Press, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davenport T.H.: Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dreiling A., Rosemann M., van del Aalst W., Sadiq W.: From conceptual process models to running systems: a holistic approach for the configuration of enterprise system processes. Decis. Support Syst. 5(2), 189–207 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Georgakopoulos D., Hornick M., Sheth A.: An overview of workflow management: from process modelling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distrib. Parallel Databases 3(2), 119–154 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hagen, C., Alonso, G.: Flexible exception handling in process support systems. In Technical report no.290, ETH Zurich (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hwanga S., Tangb J.: Consulting past exceptions to facilitate workflow exception handling. Decis. Support Syst. 37, 49–69 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jablonski S., Bussler C.: Workflow Management: Modeling Concepts, Architecture and Implementation. International Thomson Computer Press, UK (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luo Z., Sheth A., Kochut K., Miller J.: Exception handling in workflow systems. Appl. Intell. 13(2), 125–147 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merienne F.: Human factors consideration in the interaction process with virtual environment. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 4(2), 83–86 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mourão, H., Antunes, P.: Supporting effective unexpected exceptions handling in workflow management systems. 2007 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents, Seoul. Proceedings of the conference, pp. 1242–1249 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mejia-Gutierrez R., Fischer X., Bennis F.: A Tutor Agent for supporting distributed knowledge modelling in interactive product design. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Technol. Appl. (IJISTA) 4(3), 399–420 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mondragon A.C., Lyons A.C., Kehoe D.F.: Assessing the value of information systems in supporting Agility in high tech manufacturing enterprises. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 24(12), 1219–1246 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Patel N., Hlupic V.: Dynamic Business Process Modelling (BPM) for business process change. Int. J. Simul. Syst. Sci. Technol. 2(2), 51–64 (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Preiss K., Goldman S.L., Nagel R.N.: Cooperate to compete: building agile business relationship. Van Nostrand Reinhold Ed., New York (1996)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aguilar-Savén R.S.: Business process modelling: review and framework. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 90, 129–149 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sheth, A., Georgakopoulos, D., Joosten, S., Rusinkiewicz, M., Scacchi, W., Wileden, J., Wolf, A.: Report from the NSF Workshop on Workflow and Process Automation in Information Systems. Technical report, University of Georgia, UGA-CS-TR-96-003 (1996)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Strong D.M., Miller S.M.: Exceptions and Exception Handling in Computerized Information Processes. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 13(2), 206–233 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sadiq, S.W., Orlowska, M.E.: On Capturing Exceptions in Workflow Process Models. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Business, Information Systems. Poznan (2000)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tseng M.M., Jiao J.: Mass customization. In: Salvendy, G. (eds) Handbook of industrial engineering, pp. 684–709. Wiley, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vojevodina, D., Kulvietis, G., Bindokas, P.: The Method for E-business Exception Handling. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA’05), pp. 203–208 (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Workflow Management Coalition. The Workflow Reference Model. Document Number TC00-1003, Issue 1.1 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maura Mengoni
    • 1
  • Serena Graziosi
    • 1
  • Marco Mandolini
    • 1
  • Margherita Peruzzini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPolytechnic University of MarcheAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations