Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 475, Issue 10, pp 2481–2483 | Cite as

CORR Insights®: Younger Patients and Men Achieve Higher Outcome Scores Than Older Patients and Women After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

CORR Insights

References

  1. 1.
    Ageberg E, Forssblad M, Herbertsson P, Roos EM. Sex differences in patient-reported outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Data from the Swedish knee ligament register. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1334–1342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE. Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:1543–1552.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cox CL, Huston LJ, Dunn WR, Reinke EK, Nwosu SK, Parker RD, Wright RW, Kaeding CC, Marx RG, Amendola A, McCarty EC, Spindler KP. Are articular cartilage lesions and meniscus tears predictive of IKDC, KOOS, and Marx activity level outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A 6-year multicenter cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1058–1067.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Desai N, Bjornsson H, Samuelsson K, Karlsson J, Forssblad M. Outcomes after ACL reconstruction with focus on older patients: Results from The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:379–386.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eitzen I, Holm I, Risberg MA. Preoperative quadriceps strength is a significant predictor of knee function two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:371–376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grindem H, Granan LP, Risberg MA, Engebretsen L, Snyder-Mackler L, Eitzen I. How does a combined preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation programme influence the outcome of ACL reconstruction 2 years after surgery? A comparison between patients in the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort and the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:385–389.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grindem H, Risberg MA, Eitzen I. Two factors that may underpin outstanding outcomes after ACL rehabilitation. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:1425.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grindem H, Snyder-Mackler L, Moksnes H, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: The Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:804–808.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iriuchishima T, Shirakura K, Horaguchi T, Wada N, Sohmiya M, Tazawa M, Fu FH. Age as a predictor of residual muscle weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:173–178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maletis GB, Granan LP, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT, Engebretsen L. Comparison of community-based ACL reconstruction registries in the U.S. and Norway. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:31–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seil R, Mouton C, Lion A, Nuhrenborger C, Pape D, Theisen D. There is no such thing like a single ACL injury: Profiles of ACL-injured patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102:105–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomeé R, Neeter C, Gustavsson A, Thomeé P, Augustsson J, Eriksson B, Karlsson J. Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:1143–1151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryCentre Hospitalier de LuxembourgLuxembourgLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations