Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 475, Issue 10, pp 2513–2522 | Cite as

Report of the Primary Outcomes for Gait Mechanics in Men of the ACL-SPORTS Trial: Secondary Prevention With and Without Perturbation Training Does Not Restore Gait Symmetry in Men 1 or 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction

  • Jacob John Capin
  • Ryan Zarzycki
  • Amelia Arundale
  • Kathleen Cummer
  • Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Symposium: Improving Care for Patients With ACL Injuries: A Team Approach

Abstract

Background

Movement asymmetries during walking are common after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction and may influence the early development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Preoperative neuromuscular training (like perturbation training, which is neuromuscular training requiring selective muscle activation in response to surface perturbations) improves gait asymmetries and functional outcomes among people who are ACL-deficient, but the effect of postoperative perturbation training on gait mechanics after ACL reconstruction is unknown.

Questions/purposes

Among men undergoing ACL reconstruction, we sought to compare strength, agility, and secondary prevention (SAP) treatment with SAP plus perturbation training (SAP+PERT) with respect to (1) gait mechanics; and (2) elimination of gait asymmetries 1 and 2 years after ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Forty men were randomized into a SAP group or a SAP+PERT group after ACL reconstruction and before returning to preinjury activities. Participants were required to achieve ≥ 80% quadriceps muscle strength symmetry, minimal knee effusion, full ROM, no reports of pain, and completion of a running progression (all between 3 and 9 months postoperatively) before enrollment. Of 94 potentially eligible athletic male patients evaluated < 9 months after ACL reconstruction, 54 were excluded for prespecified reasons. Participants underwent motion analysis during overground walking at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Variables of interest included (1) sagittal and frontal plane hip and knee angles and moments at peak knee flexion angle; (2) sagittal plane hip and knee angles and moments at peak knee extension angle; (3) sagittal plane hip and knee excursion during weight acceptance; and (4) sagittal plane hip and knee excursion during midstance. We also calculated the proportion of athletes in each group who walked with clinically meaningful interlimb asymmetry in sagittal plane hip and knee variables and compared these proportions using odds ratios. There was no differential loss to followup between groups.

Results

There were no differences between the SAP or SAP+PERT groups for the biomechanical gait variables. The involved limb’s knee excursion during midstance for the SAP (mean ± SD: 1 year: 15° ± 5°; 2 years: 16° ± 5°) and SAP+PERT (1 year: 16° ± 5°; 2 years: 15° ± 4°) athletes was not different between groups at 1 year (mean difference: −1°; 95% confidence interval [CI], −5° to 2°; p = 0.49) or 2 years (mean difference: 1°; 95% CI, −2° to 4°; p = 0.54). There were no differences between SAP and SAP+PERT athletes regarding the elimination of gait asymmetries, and gait asymmetries persisted to a large degree in both groups 1 and 2 years postoperatively. At 1 year, 11 of 18 SAP and 11 of 20 SAP+PERT athletes walked with truncated knee excursions during weight acceptance (odds ratio: 0.8, p = 0.70) and midstance (SAP 12 of 18, SAP+PERT 12 of 20; odds ratio: 0.8, p = 0.67), whereas at 2 years postoperatively, truncated knee excursions during weight acceptance (SAP seven of 17, SAP+PERT eight of 19; odds ratio: 1.0, p = 0.96) and midstance (SAP five of 17, SAP+PERT 11 of 19; odds ratio: 3.3, p = 0.09) remained prevalent.

Conclusions

We found that a comprehensive, progressive return-to-sport training program with or without perturbation was not effective at restoring interlimb symmetry among men 1 or 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Although gait asymmetries improved from 1 to 2 years postoperatively, meaningful asymmetries persisted in both groups. To restore gait symmetry after ACL reconstruction, additional interventions likely are necessary.

Level of Evidence

Level II, therapeutic study.

References

  1. 1.
    Arundale AJH, Cummer K, Capin JJ, Zarzycki R, Snyder-Mackler L. Report of the Clinical and Functional Primary Outcomes in Men of the ACL-SPORTS Trial: Similar Outcomes in Men Receiving Secondary Prevention With and Without Perturbation Training 1 and 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017; February. DOI 10.1007/s11999-017-5280-2.
  2. 2.
    Abourezk MN, Ithurburn MP, McNally MP, Thoma LM, Briggs MS, Hewett TE, Spindler KP, Kaeding CC, Schmitt LC. Hamstring strength asymmetry at 3 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction alters knee mechanics during gait and jogging. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:97–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adams D, Logerstedt D, Hunter-Giordano A, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:601–614.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andriacchi TP, Koo S, Scanlan SF. Gait mechanics influence healthy cartilage morphology and osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:95–101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buchanan TS, Lloyd DG, Manal K, Besier TF. Neuromusculoskeletal modeling: estimation of muscle forces and joint moments and movements from measurements of neural command. J Appl Biomech. 2004;20:367–395.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Butler RJ, Minick KI, Ferber R, Underwood F. Gait mechanics after ACL reconstruction: implications for the early onset of knee osteoarthritis. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:366–370.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chappell JD, Limpisvasti O. Effect of a neuromuscular training program on the kinetics and kinematics of jumping tasks. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1081–1086.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chmielewski TL, Hurd WJ, Rudolph KS, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Perturbation training improves knee kinematics and reduces muscle co-contraction after complete unilateral anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Phys Ther. 2005;85:740–754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daniel DM, Stone M Lou, Dobson BE, Fithian DC, Rossman DJ, Kaufman KR. Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:632–644.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Di Stasi S, Hartigan EH, Snyder-Mackler L. Sex-specific gait adaptations prior to and up to 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45:207–214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Di Stasi S, Myer GD, Hewett TE. Neuromuscular training to target deficits associated with second anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43:777–792.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Di Stasi SL, Logerstedt D, Gardinier ES, Snyder-Mackler L. Gait patterns differ between ACL-reconstructed athletes who pass return-to-sport criteria and those who fail. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:1310–1318.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Di Stasi SL, Snyder-Mackler L. The effects of neuromuscular training on the gait patterns of ACL-deficient men and women. Clin Biomech. 2012;27:360–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eitzen I, Fernandes L, Nordsletten L, Risberg MA. No effects of a 12-week supervised exercise therapy program on gait in patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis: a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. J Negat Results Biomed. 2015;14:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fitzgerald GK, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. The efficacy of perturbation training in nonoperative anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation programs for physical active individuals. Phys Ther. 2000;80:128–140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gardinier ES, Di Stasi S, Manal K, Buchanan TS, Snyder-Mackler L. Knee contact force asymmetries in patients who failed return-to-sport readiness criteria 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2917–2925.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gardinier ES, Manal K, Buchanan TS, Snyder-Mackler L. Clinically-relevant measures associated with altered contact forces in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Clin Biomech. 2014;29:531–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grindem H, Snyder-Mackler L, Moksnes H, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:804–808.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hart JM, Ko JW, Konold T, Pietrosimone B. Sagittal plane knee joint moments following anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction: a systematic review. Clin Biomech. 2010;25:277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hartigan E, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Perturbation training prior to ACL reconstruction improves gait asymmetries in non-copers. J Orthop Res. 2009;27:724–729.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hartigan E, Lawrence M, Murray T, Shaw B, Collins E, Powers K, Townsend J. Biomechanical profiles when towing a sled and wearing a weighted vest once cleared for sports post-ACL reconstruction. Sports Health. 2016;8:456–464.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, Staubli HU. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1:226–234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hewett TE, Di Stasi SL, Myer GD. Current concepts for injury prevention in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:216–224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Holm I, Oiestad BE, Risberg MA, Aune AK. No difference in knee function or prevalence of osteoarthritis after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with 4-strand hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon-bone autograft: a randomized study with 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:448–454.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hurd WJ, Chmielewski TL, Snyder-Mackler L. Perturbation-enhanced neuromuscular training alters muscle activity in female athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:60–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Wainner RS, Fu FH, Harner CD. Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1132–1145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khandha A, Manal K, Wellsandt E, Capin J, Snyder-Mackler L, Buchanan TS. A comparison of knee gait mechanics in subjects with and without medial compartment knee osteoarthritis five years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Res. 2016 Apr 15. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Labanca L, Laudani L, Menotti F, Rocchi J, Mariani PP, Giombini A, Pigozzi F, Macaluso A. Asymmetrical lower extremity loading early after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a significant predictor of asymmetrical loading at the time of return to sport. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95:248–255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Manal K, Buchanan TS. An electromyogram-driven musculoskeletal model of the knee to predict in vivo joint contact forces during normal and novel gait patterns. J Biomed Eng. 2013;135:021014.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mather RC 3rd, Koenig L, Kocher MS, Dall TM, Gallo P, Scott DJ, Bach BR Jr, Spindler KP; MOON Knee Group. Societal and economic impact of anterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1751–1759.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Meierbachtol A, Rohman E, Paur E, Bottoms J, Tompkins M. Quantitative improvements in hop test scores after a 6-week neuromuscular training program. Sports Health. 2016 Sep 12. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moisio KC, Sumner DR, Shott S, Hurwitz DE. Normalization of joint moments during gait: a comparison of two techniques. J Biomech. 2003;36:599–603.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Myer GD, Ford KR, Palumbo JP, Hewett TE. Neuromuscular training improves performance and lower-extremity biomechanics in female athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:51–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Noyes F, Barber S, Mangine R. Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:513–518.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Risberg M, Moksnes H, Storevold A, Holm I, Snyder-Mackler L. Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament injury influences joint loading during walking but not hopping. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:423–428.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Roewer BD, Di Stasi SL, Snyder-Mackler L. Quadriceps strength and weight acceptance strategies continue to improve two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Biomech. 2011;44:1948–1953.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Saxby DJ, Bryant AL, Modenese L, Gerus P, Killen BA, Konrath J, Fortin K, Wrigley TV, Bennell KL, Cicuttini FM, Vertullo C, Feller JA, Whitehead T, Gallie P, Lloyd DG. Tibiofemoral contact forces in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48:2195–2206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Spindler KP, Wright RW. Clinical practice. Anterior cruciate ligament tear. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2135–2142.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Van Melick N, van Cingel REH, Brooijmans F, Neeter C, van Tienen T, Hullegie W, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW. Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1506–1515.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Webster KE, Feller JA. Alterations in joint kinematics during walking following hamstring and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Clin Biomech. 2011;26:175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wellsandt E, Gardinier ES, Manal K, Axe MJ, Buchanan TS, Snyder-Mackler L. Decreased knee joint loading associated with early knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:143–151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    White K, Di Stasi SL, Smith AH, Snyder-Mackler L. Anterior cruciate ligament-specialized post-operative return-to-sports (ACL-SPORTS) training: a randomized control trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    White K, Logerstedt D, Snyder-Mackler L. Gait asymmetries persist 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013;1:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wiggins AJ, Grandhi RK, Schneider DK, Stanfield D, Webster KE, Myer GD. Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:1861–1876.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob John Capin
    • 1
  • Ryan Zarzycki
    • 1
  • Amelia Arundale
    • 1
  • Kathleen Cummer
    • 2
  • Lynn Snyder-Mackler
    • 1
  1. 1.University of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Pima Medical InstituteSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations