Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 475, Issue 12, pp 2917–2925 | Cite as

Definitional Differences of ‘Outpatient’ Versus ‘Inpatient’ THA and TKA Can Affect Study Outcomes

  • Patawut Bovonratwet
  • Matthew L. Webb
  • Nathaniel T. Ondeck
  • Adam M. Lukasiewicz
  • Jonathan J. Cui
  • Ryan P. McLynn
  • Jonathan N. Grauer
Symposium: Learning From Large-Scale Orthopaedic Databases

Abstract

Background

There has been great interest in performing outpatient THA and TKA. Studies have compared such procedures done as outpatients versus inpatients. However, stated “outpatient” status as defined by large national databases such as the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) may not be a consistent entity, and the actual lengths of stay of those patients categorized as outpatients in NSQIP have not been specifically ascertained and may in fact include some patients who are “observed” for one or more nights. Current regulations in the United States allow these “observed” patients to stay more than one night at the hospital under observation status despite being coded as outpatients. Determining the degree to which this is the case, and what, exactly, “outpatient” means in the NSQIP, may influence the way clinicians read studies from that source and the way hospital systems and policymakers use those data.

Questions/Purposes

The purposes of this study were (1) to utilize the NSQIP database to characterize the differences in definition of “inpatient” and “outpatient” (stated status versus actual length of stay [LOS], measured in days) for THA and TKA; and (2) to study the effect of defining populations using different definitions.

Methods

Patients who underwent THA and TKA in the 2005 to 2014 NSQIP database were identified. Outpatient procedures were defined as either hospital LOS = 0 days in NSQIP or being termed “outpatient” by the hospital. The actual hospital LOS of “outpatients” was characterized. “Outpatients” were considered to have stayed overnight if they had a LOS of 1 day or longer. The effects of the different definitions on 30-day outcomes were evaluated using multivariate analysis while controlling for potential confounding factors.

Results

Of 72,651 patients undergoing THA, 529 were identified as “outpatients” but only 63 of these (12%) had a LOS = 0. Of 117,454 patients undergoing TKA, 890 were identified as “outpatients” but only 95 of these (11%) had a LOS = 0. After controlling for potential confounding factors such as gender, body mass index, functional status before surgery, comorbidities, and smoking status, we found “inpatient” THA to be associated with increased risk of any adverse event (relative risk, 2.643, p = 0.002), serious adverse event (relative risk, 2.455, p = 0.011), and readmission (relative risk, 2.775, p = 0.010) compared with “outpatient” THA. However, for the same procedure and controlling for the same factors, patients who had LOS > 0 were not associated with any increased risk compared with patients who had LOS = 0. A similar trend was also found in the TKA cohort.

Conclusions

Future THA, TKA, or other investigations on this topic should consistently quantify the term “outpatient” because different definitions, stated status or actual LOS, may lead to different assignments of risk factors for postoperative complications. Accurate data regarding risk factors for complications after total joint arthroplasty are crucial for efforts to reduce length of hospital stay and minimize complications.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study.

Supplementary material

11999_2017_5236_MOESM1_ESM.docx (168 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 169 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    ACS-NSQIP. User Guide for the 2013 ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File. 2014. Available at: http://site.acsnsqip.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/ACS_NSQIP_PUF_User_Guide_2013.pdf. Accessed June 5, 2016.
  2. 2.
    Aynardi M, Post Z, Ong A, Orozco F, Sukin DC. Outpatient surgery as a means of cost reduction in total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study. HSS J. 2014;10:252–255.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berger RA, Cross MB, Sanders S. Outpatient hip and knee replacement: the experience from the first 15 years. Instr Course Lect. 2016;65:547–551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berger RA, Kusuma SK, Sanders SA, Thill ES, Sporer SM. The feasibility and perioperative complications of outpatient knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1443–1449.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bertin KC. Minimally invasive outpatient total hip arthroplasty: a financial analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;435:154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bohl DD, Fu MC, Golinvaux NS, Basques BA, Gruskay JA, Grauer JN. The ‘July effect’ in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: analysis of 21,434 cases from the ACS-NSQIP database. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1332–1338.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bohl DD, Russo GS, Basques BA, Golinvaux NS, Fu MC, Long WD 3rd, Grauer JN. Variations in data collection methods between national databases affect study results: a comparison of the nationwide inpatient sample and national surgical quality improvement program databases for lumbar spine fusion procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:e193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cross MB, Berger R. Feasibility and safety of performing outpatient unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2014;38:443–447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dorr LD, Thomas DJ, Zhu J, Dastane M, Chao L, Long WT. Outpatient total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:501–506.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dunn OJ. Multiple comparisons among means. J Am Stat Assoc. 1961;56:52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ehlert BA, Nelson JT, Goettler CE, Parker FM, Bogey WM, Powell CS, Stoner MC. Examining the myth of the ‘July phenomenon’ in surgical patients. Surgery. 2011;150:332–338.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fact Sheet: Two-Midnight Rule. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Fact-sheets/2015-Fact-sheets-items/2015-07-01-2.html. Accessed October 3, 2016.
  14. 14.
    Gerard PD, Smith DR, Weerakkody G. Limits of retrospective power analysis. Journal of Wildlife Management. 1998;62:801–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goyal N, Chen AF, Padgett SE, Tan TL, Kheir MM, Hopper RH Jr, Hamilton WG, Hozack WJ. Otto Aufranc Award: A multicenter, randomized study of outpatient versus inpatient total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun 10. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hartog YM, Mathijssen NM, Vehmeijer SB. Total hip arthroplasty in an outpatient setting in 27 selected patients. Acta Orthop. 2015;86:667–670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoenig JM, Heisey DM. The abuse of power. Am Stat. 2001;55:19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Inacio MC, Chen Y, Paxton EW, Namba RS, Kurtz SM, Cafri G. Statistics in Brief: An introduction to the use of propensity scores. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:2722–2726.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jain U, Chandra RK, Smith SS, Pilecki M, Kim JY. Predictors of readmission after outpatient otolaryngologic surgery. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:1783–1788.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khavanin N, Mlodinow A, Kim JY, Ver Halen JP, Antony AK, Samant S. Assessing safety and outcomes in outpatient versus inpatient thyroidectomy using the NSQIP: a propensity score matched analysis of 16,370 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:429–436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khavanin N, Mlodinow A, Kim JY, Ver Halen JP, Samant S. Predictors of 30-day readmission after outpatient thyroidectomy: an analysis of the 2011 NSQIP data set. Am J Otolaryngol. 2014;35:332–339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khavanin N, Mlodinow A, Milad MP, Bilimoria KY, Kim JY. Comparison of perioperative outcomes in outpatient and inpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20:604–610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khuri SF. The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery. Surgery. 2005;138:837–843.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kolisek FR, McGrath MS, Jessup NM, Monesmith EA, Mont MA. Comparison of outpatient versus inpatient total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1438–1442.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kort NP, Bemelmans YF, Schotanus MG. Outpatient surgery for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is effective and safe. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jul 1. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lim S, Jordan SW, Jain U, Kim JY. Predictors and causes of unplanned re-operations in outpatient plastic surgery: a multi-institutional analysis of 6749 patients using the 2011 NSQIP database. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014;48:270–275.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lipira AB, Sood RF, Tatman PD, Davis JI, Morrison SD, Ko JH. Complications within 30 days of hand surgery: an analysis of 10,646 patients. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:1852–1859.e1853.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lovald ST, Ong KL, Malkani AL, Lau EC, Schmier JK, Kurtz SM, Manley MT. Complications, mortality, and costs for outpatient and short-stay total knee arthroplasty patients in comparison to standard-stay patients. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:510–515.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lovecchio F, Alvi H, Sahota S, Beal M, Manning D. Is outpatient arthroplasty as safe as fast-track inpatient arthroplasty? A propensity score matched analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(Suppl):197–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lukasiewicz AM, Basques BA, Bohl DD, Webb ML, Samuel AM, Grauer JN. Myelopathy is associated with increased all-cause morbidity and mortality following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a study of 5256 patients in American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:443–449.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes S. Thirty-day morbidity after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: identification of risk factors and emphasis on the safety of outpatient procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:1288–1294.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mason RJ, Moazzez A, Sohn HJ, Berne TV, Katkhouda N. Laparoscopic versus open anterior abdominal wall hernia repair: 30-day morbidity and mortality using the ACS-NSQIP database. Ann Surg. 2011;254:641–652.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Massenburg BB, Sanati-Mehrizy P, Jablonka EM, Taub PJ. The impact of resident participation in outpatient plastic surgical procedures. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016;40:584–591.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McGirt MJ, Godil SS, Asher AL, Parker SL, Devin CJ. Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39:E9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mioton LM, Alghoul MS, Kim JY. A comparative analysis of readmission rates after outpatient cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34:317–323.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Otero JE, Gholson JJ, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Bedard NA, Callaghan JJ. Length of hospitalization after joint arthroplasty: does early discharge affect complications and readmission rates? J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:2714–2725.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Outpatient Observation Services. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Transmittals/downloads/r42bp.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2016.
  39. 39.
    Pannucci CJ, Shanks A, Moote MJ, Bahl V, Cederna PS, Naughton NN, Wakefield TW, Henke PK, Campbell DA, Kheterpal S. Identifying patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism requiring treatment after outpatient surgery. Ann Surg. 2012;255:1093–1099.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Parcells BW, Giacobbe D, Macknet D, Smith A, Schottenfeld M, Harwood DA, Kayiaros S. Total joint arthroplasty in a stand-alone ambulatory surgical center: short-term outcomes. Orthopedics. 2016;39:223–228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes SA. Outpatient surgery reduces short-term complications in lumbar discectomy: an analysis of 4310 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:264–271.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Qin C, Antony AK, Aggarwal A, Jordan S, Gutowski KA, Kim JY. Assessing outcomes and safety of inpatient versus outpatient tissue expander immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3724–3729.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Qin C, Hackett NJ, Kim JY. Assessing the safety of outpatient ventral hernia repair: a NSQIP analysis of 7666 patients. Hernia. 2015;19:919–926.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rao A, Polanco A, Qiu S, Kim J, Chin EH, Divino CM, Nguyen SQ. Safety of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: analysis of 15,248 patients using the NSQIP database. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:1038–1043.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Raval MV, Hamilton BH, Ingraham AM, Ko CY, Hall BL. The importance of assessing both inpatient and outpatient surgical quality. Ann Surg. 2011;253:611–618.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sacco Casamassima MG, Gause C, Yang J, Goldstein SD, Swarup A, Abdullah F. Safety of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children: analysis of 2050 elective ACS NSQIP-pediatric cases. Pediatr Surg Int. 2016;32:541–551.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schilling PL, Hallstrom BR, Birkmeyer JD, Carpenter JE. Prioritizing perioperative quality improvement in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1884–1889.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schotanus MG, Bemelmans YF, Grimm B, Heyligers IC, Kort NP. Physical activity after outpatient surgery and enhanced recovery for total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Aug 4. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sundararajan V, Henderson T, Perry C, Muggivan A, Quan H, Ghali WA. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1288–1294.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Thibaudeau S, Anari JB, Carducci N, Carrigan RB. 30-day readmission after pediatric upper extremity surgery: Analysis of the NSQIP database. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:1370–1374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Weaver C. MAW. Medicare rules reshape hospital admissions. The Wall Street Journal. December 1, 2015.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:702–706.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patawut Bovonratwet
    • 1
  • Matthew L. Webb
    • 2
  • Nathaniel T. Ondeck
    • 1
  • Adam M. Lukasiewicz
    • 1
  • Jonathan J. Cui
    • 1
  • Ryan P. McLynn
    • 1
  • Jonathan N. Grauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and RehabilitationYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryHospital of the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations