Advertisement

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 473, Issue 5, pp 1612–1619 | Cite as

Incidence of Surgical Site Infection After Spine Surgery: What Is the Impact of the Definition of Infection?

  • Sjoerd P. F. T. Nota
  • Yvonne Braun
  • David RingEmail author
  • Joseph H. Schwab
Symposium: Patient Safety: Collaboration, Communication, and Physician Leadership

Abstract

Background

Orthopaedic surgical site infections (SSIs) can delay recovery, add impairments, and decrease quality of life, particularly in patients undergoing spine surgery, in whom SSIs may also be more common. Efforts to prevent and treat SSIs of the spine rely on the identification and registration of these adverse events in large databases. The effective use of these databases to answer clinical questions depends on how the conditions in question, such as infection, are defined in the databases queried, but the degree to which different definitions of infection might cause different risk factors to be identified by those databases has not been evaluated.

Questions/purposes

The purpose of this study was to determine whether different definitions of SSI identify different risk factors for SSI. Specifically, we compared the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) coding, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for deep infection, and incision and débridement for infection to determine if each is associated with distinct risk factors for SSI.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective study, a sample of 5761 adult patients who had an orthopaedic spine surgery between January 2003 and August 2013 were identified from our institutional database. The mean age of the patients was 56 years (± 16 SD), and slightly more than half were men. We applied three different definitions of infection: ICD-9 code for SSI, the CDC criteria for deep infection, and incision and débridement for infection. Three hundred sixty-one (6%) of the 5761 surgeries received an ICD-9 code for SSI within 90 days of surgery. After review of the medical records of these 361 patients, 216 (4%) met the CDC criteria for deep SSI, and 189 (3%) were taken to the operating room for irrigation and débridement within 180 days of the day of surgery.

Results

We found the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the duration of the operation, obesity, and posterior surgical approach were independently associated with a higher risk of infection for each of the three definitions of SSI. The influence of malnutrition, smoking, specific procedures, and specific surgeons varied by definition of infection. These elements accounted for approximately 6% of the variability in the risk of developing an infection.

Conclusions

The frequency of SSI after spine surgery varied according to the definition of an infection, but the most important risk factors did not. We conclude that large database studies may be better suited for identifying risk factors than for determining absolute numbers of infections.

Level of Evidence

Level III, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Keywords

Spine Surgery Charlson Comorbidity Index Deep Infection Current Procedural Terminology Code Billing Code 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

11999_2014_3933_MOESM1_ESM.doc (270 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 270 kb)
11999_2014_3933_MOESM2_ESM.doc (52 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 53 kb)
11999_2014_3933_MOESM3_ESM.doc (50 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOC 50 kb)
11999_2014_3933_MOESM4_ESM.doc (50 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOC 50 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bachoura A, Guitton TG, Smith RM, Vrahas MS, Zurakowski D, Ring D. Infirmity and injury complexity are risk factors for surgical-site infection after operative fracture care. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2621–2630.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bohl DD, Basques BA, Golinvaux NS, Baumgaertner MR, Grauer JN. Nationwide Inpatient Sample and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program give different results in hip fracture studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:1672–1680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Capen DA, Calderone RR, Green A. Perioperative risk factors for wound infections after lower back fusions. Orthop Clin North Am. 1996;27:83–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dubory A, Giorgi H, Walter A, Bouyer B, Vassal M, Zairi F, Dhenin A, Grelat M, Lonjon N, Dauzac C, Lonjon G. Surgical-site infection in spinal injury: incidence and risk factors in a prospective cohort of 518 patients. Eur Spine J. 2014.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Durand F, Berthelot P, Cazorla C, Farizon F, Lucht F. Smoking is a risk factor of organ/space surgical site infection in orthopaedic surgery with implant materials. Int Orthop. 2013;37:723–727.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jiang J, Teng Y, Fan Z, Khan S, Xia Y. Does Obesity Affect the Surgical Outcome and Complication Rates of Spinal Surgery? A Meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klein JD, Hey LA, Yu CS, Klein BB, Coufal FJ, Young EP, Marshall LF, Garfin SR. Perioperative nutrition and postoperative complications in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21:2676–2682.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong KL, Carreon L, Watson H, Albert T, Glassman S. Infection risk for primary and revision instrumented lumbar spine fusion in the Medicare population. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17:342–347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Massie JB, Heller JG, Abitbol JJ, McPherson D, Garfin SR. Postoperative posterior spinal wound infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992:99–108.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olsen MA, Nepple JJ, Riew KD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Mayfield J, Fraser VJ. Risk factors for surgical site infection following orthopaedic spinal operations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:62–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schimmel JJ, Horsting PP, de Kleuver M, Wonders G, van Limbeek J. Risk factors for deep surgical site infections after spinal fusion. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:1711–1719.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schuster JM, Rechtine G, Norvell DC, Dettori JR. The influence of perioperative risk factors and therapeutic interventions on infection rates after spine surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:S125–137.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simpson JM, Silveri CP, Balderston RA, Simeone FA, An HS. The results of operations on the lumbar spine in patients who have diabetes mellitus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1823–1829.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wimmer C, Gluch H, Franzreb M, Ogon M. Predisposing factors for infection in spine surgery: a survey of 850 spinal procedures. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11:124–128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xing D, Ma JX, Ma XL, Song DH, Wang J, Chen Y, Yang Y, Zhu SW, Ma BY, Feng R. A methodological, systematic review of evidence-based independent risk factors for surgical site infections after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:605–615.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sjoerd P. F. T. Nota
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yvonne Braun
    • 2
  • David Ring
    • 2
    Email author
  • Joseph H. Schwab
    • 1
  1. 1.Orthopaedic Spine Service & Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations