Does Use of a Powered Ankle-foot Prosthesis Restore Whole-body Angular Momentum During Walking at Different Speeds?
- 572 Downloads
Whole-body angular momentum (H) influences fall risk, is tightly regulated during walking, and is primarily controlled by muscle force generation. People with transtibial amputations using passive-elastic prostheses typically have greater H compared with nonamputees.
(1) Do people with unilateral transtibial amputations using passive-elastic prostheses have greater sagittal and frontal plane H ranges of motion during walking compared with nonamputees and compared with using powered prostheses? (2) Does use of powered ankle-foot prostheses result in equivalent H ranges in all planes of motion compared with nonamputees during walking as a result of normative prosthetic ankle power generation?
Eight patients with a unilateral transtibial amputation and eight nonamputees walked 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50, and 1.75 m/s while we measured kinematics and ground reaction forces. We calculated H for participants using their passive-elastic prosthesis and a powered ankle-foot prosthesis and for nonamputees at each speed.
Patients using passive-elastic prostheses had 32% to 59% greater sagittal H ranges during the affected leg stance phase compared with nonamputees at 1.00 to 1.75 m/s (p < 0.05). Patients using passive-elastic prostheses had 5% and 9% greater sagittal H ranges compared with using powered prostheses at 1.25 and 1.50 m/s, respectively (p < 0.05). Participants using passive-elastic prostheses had 29% and 17% greater frontal H ranges at 0.75 and 1.50 m/s, respectively, compared with nonamputees (p < 0.05). Surprisingly, patients using powered prostheses had 26% to 50% greater sagittal H ranges during the affected leg stance phase compared with nonamputees at 1.00 to 1.75 m/s (p < 0.05). Patients using powered prostheses also had 26% greater frontal H range compared with nonamputees at 0.75 m/s (p < 0.05).
People with a transtibial amputation may more effectively regulate H at two specific walking speeds when using powered compared with passive-elastic prostheses.
Our results support the hypothesis that an ankle-foot prosthesis capable of providing net positive work during the stance phase of walking reduces sagittal plane H; future studies are needed to validate our biomechanical findings with larger numbers of patients and should determine whether powered prostheses can decrease the risk of falls in patients with a transtibial amputation.
KeywordsGround Reaction Force Stance Phase Vertical Ground Reaction Force Lower Extremity Amputation External Moment
We thank BiOM for providing prostheses and technical assistance.
- 6.Elftman H. The function of the arms in walking. Hum Biol. 1939;11:529–535.Google Scholar
- 12.Lenth RV. Java Applets for Power and Sample Size [computer software] Available at: http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~rlenth/Power. Accessed August 12, 2013.
- 16.Palmer ML. Sagittal plane characterization of normal human ankle function across a range of walking speeds. Cambridge, MA, USA: Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2002. Available at: http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/16802/50504711.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2014.
- 22.Simoneau GG, Krebs DE. Whole-body momentum during gait: a preliminary study of non-fallers and frequent fallers. J Appl Biomech. 2000;16:1–13.Google Scholar
- 24.Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. New York, NY, USA: Wiley; 1990.Google Scholar