High Early Failure Rate After Cementless Hip Replacement in the Octogenarian
- 988 Downloads
Use of cementless hip replacements is increasing in many countries, but the best method for fixation for octogenarian patients remains unknown.
We studied how fixation method (cemented, cementless, hybrid) affects the survival of primary hip replacements and mortality in patients 80 years or older. Specifically, we asked if fixation method affects (1) the risk of revision; (2) the reasons for revision; and (3) the mortality after contemporary primary hip replacement in octogenarian patients.
A total of 4777 primary total hip replacements were performed in 4509 octogenarian patients with primary osteoarthritis in Finland between 1998 and 2009 and were registered in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Comorbidity data were collected from a nationwide quality register. Survival of hip replacements, using any revision as the end point, and mortality were analyzed using competing risks survival analysis and Cox regression analysis. The average followup was 4 years (range, 1–13 years).
Cementless hip replacements were associated with a higher rate of early (within 1 year) revision compared with cemented hip replacements (hazard ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.7–5.1), particularly in women. The difference was not explained by comorbidity or provider-related factors. Periprosthetic fracture was the leading mode of failure of cementless hip replacements. After 1 year, there were no differences in the survival rates although 10-year survival was slightly lower for cementless than cemented and hybrid hip replacements (93.9% [95% CI, 91.1%–96.7%] versus 97.4% [95% CI, 96.9%–98.0%] and 98.1% [95% CI, 96.9%–99.4%], respectively). Fixation method was not associated with mortality.
Cementless fixation was associated with an increased risk of revision and did not provide any benefit in terms of lower mortality in octogenarian patients.
Level of Evidence
Level II, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
KeywordsPeriprosthetic Fracture Hospital Discharge Register Early Revision Cement Fixation Cementless Fixation
- 3.Australian Orthopaedic Association. National Joint Replacement Registry. Hip and knee arthroplasty. Annual report 2012. Available at: https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/documents/10180/60142/Annual%20Report%202012?version=1.3&t=1361226543157. Accessed July 30, 2013.
- 4.Bozic KJ, Durbhakula S, Berry DJ, Naessens JM, Rappaport K, Cisternas M, Saleh KJ, Rubash HE. Differences in patient and procedure characteristics and hospital resource use in primary and revision total joint arthroplasty: a multicenter study. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(7 suppl 3):17–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Havelin LI, Fenstad AM, Salomonsson R, Mehnert F, Furnes O, Overgaard S, Pedersen AB, Herberts P, Kärrholm J, Garellick G. The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association: a unique collaboration between 3 national hip arthroplasty registries with 280,201 THRs. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:393–401.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Jameson SS, Baker PN, Mason J, Rymaszewska M, Gregg PJ, Deehan DJ, Reed MR. Independent predictors of failure up to 7.5 years after 35 386 single-brand cementless total hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. Bone Joint J. 2013;95:747–757.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Jämsen E, Peltola M, Eskelinen A, Lehto MU. Comorbid diseases as predictors of survival of primary total hip and knee replacements: a nationwide register-based study of 96 754 operations on patients with primary osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1975–1982.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Jämsen E, Puolakka T, Eskelinen A, Jäntti P, Kalliovalkama J, Nieminen J, Valvanne J. Predictors of mortality following primary hip and knee replacement in the aged: a single-center analysis of 1,998 primary hip and knee replacements for primary osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop. 2013;84:44–53.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.National Institute for Health and Welfare. PERFECT – PERFormance, Effectiveness and Cost of Treatment episodes. Available at: www.thl.fi/en_US/web/en/project?id=21963 Accessed October 3, 2013.
- 20.National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 9th annual report 2012. Available at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Portals/0/Documents/England/Reports/9th_annual_report/NJR%209th%20Annual%20Report%202012.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2013.
- 32.Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual report 2011. Available at: http://www.shpr.se/Libraries/Documents/%c3%85rsrapport_2011_eng_webb.sflb.ashx. Accessed July 30, 2013.
- 33.The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Report June 2010. Available at: http://nrlweb.ihelse.net/eng/Report_2010.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2013.