Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 472, Issue 7, pp 2177–2184

Does Intraarticular Inflammation Predict Biomechanical Cartilage Properties?

  • Wenzel Waldstein
  • Giorgio Perino
  • Shari T. Jawetz
  • Susannah L. Gilbert
  • Friedrich Boettner
Clinical Research

Abstract

Background

Intact cartilage in the lateral compartment is an important requirement for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Progression of cartilage degeneration in the lateral compartment is a common failure mode of medial UKA. Little is known about factors that influence the mechanical properties of lateral compartment cartilage.

Questions/purposes

The purposes of this study were to answer the following questions: (1) Does the synovial fluid white blood cell count predict the biomechanical properties of macroscopically intact cartilage of the distal lateral femur? (2) Is there a correlation between MRI grading of synovitis and the biomechanical properties of macroscopically intact cartilage? (3) Is there a correlation between the histopathologic assessment of the synovium and the biomechanical properties of macroscopically intact cartilage?

Methods

The study included 84 patients (100 knees) undergoing primary TKA for varus osteoarthritis between May 2010 and January 2012. All patients underwent preoperative MRI to assess the degree of synovitis. During surgery, the cartilage of the distal lateral femur was assessed macroscopically using the Outerbridge grading scale. In knees with an Outerbridge grade of 0 or 1, osteochondral plugs were harvested from the distal lateral femur for biomechanical and histologic assessment. The synovial fluid was collected to determine the white blood cell count. Synovial tissue was taken for histologic evaluation of the degree of synovitis.

Results

The mean aggregate modulus and the mean dynamic modulus were significantly greater in knees with 150 or less white blood cells/mL synovial fluid compared with knees with greater than 150 white blood cells/mL synovial fluid. There was no correlation among MRI synovitis grades, histopathologic synovitis grades, and biomechanical cartilage properties.

Conclusions

The study suggests that lateral compartment cartilage in patients with elevated synovial fluid white blood cell counts has a reduced ability to withstand compressive loads.

Level of Evidence

Level III, diagnostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

References

  1. 1.
    Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1991.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Christy W, Cooke TD, Greenwald R, Hochberg M, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29:1039–1049.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Altman RD, Gray R. Inflammation in osteoarthritis. Clin Rheum Dis. 1985;11:353–365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Athanasiou KA, Rosenwasser MP, Buckwalter JA, Malinin TI, Mow VC. Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage. J Orthop Res. 1991;9:330–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellucci F, Meini S, Cucchi P, Catalani C, Nizzardo A, Riva A, Guidelli GM, Ferrata P, Fioravanti A, Maggi CA. Synovial fluid levels of bradykinin correlate with biochemical markers for cartilage degradation and inflammation in knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:1774–1780.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berenbaum F. Osteoarthritis as an inflammatory disease (osteoarthritis is not osteoarthrosis!). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:16–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brocklehurst R, Bayliss MT, Maroudas A, Coysh HL, Freeman MA, Revell PA, Ali SY. The composition of normal and osteoarthritic articular cartilage from human knee joints: with special reference to unicompartmental replacement and osteotomy of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:95–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brown TD, Singerman RJ. Experimental determination of the linear biphasic constitutive coefficients of human fetal proximal femoral chondroepiphysis. J Biomech. 1986;19:597–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ. Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:487–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cartier P, Khefacha A, Sanouiller JL, Frederick K. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in middle-aged patients: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Orthopedics. 2007;30:62–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davis MA, Ettinger WH, Neuhaus JM, Mallon KP. Knee osteoarthritis and physical functioning: evidence from the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study. J Rheumatol. 1991;18:591–598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deschamps G, Chol C. Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty:patients’ selection and operative technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97:648–661.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ettinger WH Jr, Fried LP, Harris T, Shemanski L, Schulz R, Robbins J. Self-reported causes of physical disability in older people: the Cardiovascular Health Study. CHS Collaborative Research Group. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:1035–1044.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Freemont AJ. Role of cytological analysis of synovial fluid in diagnosis and research. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991;50:120–123.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goldenberg DL, Egan MS, Cohen AS. Inflammatory synovitis in degenerative joint disease. J Rheumatol. 1982;9:204–209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goldring MB, Otero M. Inflammation in osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011;23:471–478.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goodfellow JW, O’Connor J, Dodd CA, Murray DW. Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heard BJ, Fritzler MJ, Wiley JP, McAllister J, Martin L, El-Gabalawy H, Hart DA, Frank CB, Krawetz R. Intraarticular and systemic inflammatory profiles may identify patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2013;40:1379–1387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kapoor M, Martel-Pelletier J, Lajeunesse D, Pelletier JP, Fahmi H. Role of proinflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011;7:33–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krenn V, Morawietz L, Burmester GR, Kinne RW, Mueller-Ladner U, Muller B, Haupl T. Synovitis score: discrimination between chronic low-grade and high-grade synovitis. Histopathology. 2006;49:358–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krenn V, Morawietz L, Haupl T, Neidel J, Petersen I, Konig A. Grading of chronic synovitis: a histopathological grading system for molecular and diagnostic pathology. Pathol Res Pract. 2002;198:317–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kurkijarvi JE, Nissi MJ, Kiviranta I, Jurvelin JS, Nieminen MT. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 characteristics of human knee articular cartilage: topographical variation and relationships to mechanical properties. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:41–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Laskin RS. Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:182–185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lindblad S, Hedfors E. Arthroscopic and immunohistologic characterization of knee joint synovitis in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1987;30:1081–1088.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Loeser RF, Goldring SR, Scanzello CR, Goldring MB. Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:1697–1707.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mak AF, Lai WM, Mow VC. Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage: I. Theoretical analysis. J Biomech. 1987;20:703–714.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maldonado M, Nam J. The role of changes in extracellular matrix of cartilage in the presence of inflammation on the pathology of osteoarthritis. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:284873.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mankin HJ, Dorfman H, Lippiello L, Zarins A. Biochemical and metabolic abnormalities in articular cartilage from osteo-arthritic human hips: II. Correlation of morphology with biochemical and metabolic data. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53:523–537.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martel-Pelletier J, Boileau C, Pelletier JP, Roughley PJ. Cartilage in normal and osteoarthritis conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008;22:351–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marx RG, Grimm P, Lillemoe KA, Robertson CM, Ayeni OR, Lyman S, Bogner EA, Pavlov H. Reliability of lower extremity alignment measurement using radiographs and PACS. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:1693–1698.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McAlindon TE, Snow S, Cooper C, Dieppe PA. Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992;51:844–849.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Merle C, Waldstein W, Pegg E, Streit MR, Gotterbarm T, Aldinger PR, Murray DW, Gill HS. Femoral offset is underestimated on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis but accurately assessed on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:477–482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ. Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:745–749.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nam J, Perera P, Liu J, Rath B, Deschner J, Gassner R, Butterfield TA, Agarwal S. Sequential alterations in catabolic and anabolic gene expression parallel pathological changes during progression of monoiodoacetate-induced arthritis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24320.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Obeid EM, Adams MA, Newman JH. Mechanical properties of articular cartilage in knees with unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:315–319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43:752–757.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pearle AD, Warren RF, Rodeo SA. Basic science of articular cartilage and osteoarthritis. Clin Sports Med. 2005;24:1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pessler F, Dai L, Diaz-Torne C, Gomez-Vaquero C, Paessler ME, Zheng DH, Einhorn E, Range U, Scanzello C, Schumacher HR. The synovitis of “non-inflammatory” orthopaedic arthropathies: a quantitative histological and immunohistochemical analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:1184–1187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S, Tirman PF, Miaux Y, White D, Kothari M, Lu Y, Fye K, Zhao S, Genant HK. Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004;12:177–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Poole AR, Kobayashi M, Yasuda T, Laverty S, Mwale F, Kojima T, Sakai T, Wahl C, El-Maadawy S, Webb G, Tchetina E, Wu W. Type II collagen degradation and its regulation in articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61(suppl 2):ii78–81.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Riddle DL, Jiranek WA, McGlynn FJ. Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:408–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ropes MW, Bauer W. Synovial Fluid Changes in Joint Disease. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1953.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shmerling RH, Delbanco TL, Tosteson AN, Trentham DE. Synovial fluid tests: what should be ordered? JAMA. 1990;264:1009–1014.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Silver FH, Bradica G, Tria A. Elastic energy storage in human articular cartilage: estimation of the elastic modulus for type II collagen and changes associated with osteoarthritis. Matrix Biol. 2002;21:129–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Slansky E, Li J, Haupl T, Morawietz L, Krenn V, Pessler F. Quantitative determination of the diagnostic accuracy of the synovitis score and its components. Histopathology. 2010;57:436–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Soohoo NF, Sharifi H, Kominski G, Lieberman JR. Cost-effectiveness analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1975–1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Swan A, Amer H, Dieppe P. The value of synovial fluid assays in the diagnosis of joint disease: a literature survey. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:493–498.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Swienckowski JJ, Pennington DW. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(suppl 1):131–142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tercic D, Bozic B. The basis of the synovial fluid analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2001;39:1221–1226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Treppo S, Koepp H, Quan EC, Cole AA, Kuettner KE, Grodzinsky AJ. Comparison of biomechanical and biochemical properties of cartilage from human knee and ankle pairs. J Orthop Res. 2000;18:739–748.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Verbrugge LM, Lepkowski JM, Konkol LL. Levels of disability among U.S. adults with arthritis. J Gerontol. 1991;46:S71–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Waldstein W, Monsef JB, Buckup J, Boettner F. The value of valgus stress radiographs in the workup for medial unicompartmental arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3998–4003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenzel Waldstein
    • 1
  • Giorgio Perino
    • 2
  • Shari T. Jawetz
    • 3
  • Susannah L. Gilbert
    • 4
  • Friedrich Boettner
    • 1
  1. 1.Adult Reconstruction & Joint Replacement DivisionHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Division of Magnetic Resonance ImagingHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiomechanicsHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations