Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 472, Issue 9, pp 2644–2657 | Cite as

Stress Radiography for the Diagnosis of Knee Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review

  • Evan W. James
  • Brady T. Williams
  • Robert F. LaPrade
Symposium: Management of the Dislocated Knee



Stress radiography is a widely used diagnostic tool to assess injury to the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments and the medial and lateral structures of the knee. However, to date, numerous techniques have been reported in the literature with no clear consensus as to which methodology is best for assessing ligament stability.


The purpose of this review was to identify which stress radiographic techniques have support in the literature for the diagnosis of acute or chronic knee ligament injuries, to define which technique is most accurate and reliable for diagnosing knee ligament injuries, and to compare the use of stress radiography with other diagnostic tests.


Two independent reviewers performed a systematic review of PubMed (MEDLINE), the EMBASE library, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register for English language studies published from January 1970 to August 2013 on the diagnosis of knee ligament injuries using stress radiography. Information describing the ligament(s) investigated, stress radiographic technique, magnitude of force, measures of accuracy and reliability, and comparative diagnostic tests were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.


A total of 16 stress techniques were described for stress radiography of the knee. The diagnostic accuracy of stress radiography including the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values varied considerably depending on the technique and choice of displacement or gapping threshold. Excellent reliability was reported for the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, varus, and valgus knee injuries. Inconsistencies were found across studies regarding the efficacy of stress radiography compared with other diagnostic modalities.


Based on the multitude of stress techniques reported, varying levels of diagnostic accuracy, and inconsistencies regarding comparative efficacy of stress radiography to other diagnostic modalities, we are not able to make specific recommendations with regard to the best stress radiography technique for the diagnosis of knee ligament injuries. Additional comparative studies using consistent methodology and appropriate blinding are necessary to further define differences in accuracy and reliability both among stress radiography techniques and between stress radiography and other diagnostic tests.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


  1. 1.
    Beldame J, Bertiaux S, Roussignol X, Lefebvre B, Adam JM, Mouilhade F, Dujardin F. Laxity measurements using stress radiography to assess anterior cruciate ligament tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97:34–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beldame J, Mouchel S, Bertiaux S, Adam JM, Mouilhade F, Roussignol X, Dujardin F. Anterior knee laxity measurement: comparison of passive stress radiographs Telos and ‘Lerat,’ and GNRB arthrometer. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98:744–750.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benvenuti JF, Vallotton JA, Meystre JL, Leyvraz PF. Objective assessment of the anterior tibial translation in Lachman test position. Comparison between three types of measurement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6:215–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniel DM, Stone ML, Barnett P, Sachs R. Use of the quadriceps active test to diagnose posterior cruciate-ligament disruption and measure posterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:386–391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dejour D, Ntagiopoulos PG, Saggin PR, Panisset JC. The diagnostic value of clinical tests, magnetic resonance imaging, and instrumented laxity in the differentiation of complete versus partial anterior cruciate ligament tears. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:491–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dejour H, Bonnin M. Tibial translation after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Two radiological tests compared. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:745–749.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Franklin JL, Rosenberg TD, Paulos LE, France EP. Radiographic assessment of instability of the knee due to rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. A quadriceps-contraction technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:365–372.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garavaglia G, Lubbeke A, Dubois-Ferrière V, Suva D, Fritschy D, Menetrey J. Accuracy of stress radiography techniques in grading isolated and combined posterior knee injuries: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:2051–2056.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garcés GL, Perdomo E, Guerra A, Cabrera-Bonilla R. Stress radiography in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Int Orthop. 1995;19:86–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garofalo R, Fanelli GC, Cikes A, N’Dele D, Kombot C, Mariani PP, Mouhsine E. Stress radiography and posterior pathological laxity of knee: comparison between two different techniques. Knee. 2009;16:251–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Granberry WM, Noble PC, Woods GW. Evaluation of an electrogoniometric instrument for measurement of laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:1316–1322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gwathmey FW Jr, Tompkins MA, Gaskin CM, Miller MD. Can stress radiography of the knee help characterize posterolateral corner injury? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:768–773.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harilainen A, Myllynen P, Rauste J, Silvennoinen E. Diagnosis of acute knee ligament injuries: the value of stress radiography compared with clinical examination, stability under anesthesia and arthroscopic or operative findings. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1986;75:37–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hewett TE, Noyes FR, Lee MD. Diagnosis of complete and partial posterior cruciate ligament ruptures. Stress radiography compared with KT-1000 arthrometer and posterior drawer testing. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:648–655.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hooper GJ. Radiological assessment of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. A new technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:292–296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jackman T, LaPrade RF, Pontinen T, Lender PA. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the kneeling technique of stress radiography for the evaluation of posterior knee laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1571–1576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacobsen K. Stress radiographical measurement of the anteroposterior, medial and lateral stability of the knee joint. Acta Orthop Scand. 1976;47:335–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jacobsen K. Stress radiographical measurements of post-traumatic knee instability. A clinical study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1977;48:301–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jacobsen K. Gonylaxometry. Stress radiographic measurement of passive stability in the knee joints of normal subjects and patients with ligament injuries. Accuracy and range of application. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1981;194:1–263.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jacobsen K, Rosenkilde P. A clinical and stress radiographical follow-up investigation after Jones’ operation for replacing the anterior cruciate ligament. Injury. 1977;8:221–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jung TM, Reinhardt C, Scheffler SU, Weiler A. Stress radiography to measure posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a comparison of five different techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:1116–1121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kastelein M, Wagemakers HP, Luijsterburg PA, Verhaar JA, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Assessing medial collateral ligament knee lesions in general practice. Am J Med. 2008;121:982–988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Katz JW, Fingeroth RJ. The diagnostic accuracy of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament comparing the Lachman test, the anterior drawer sign, and the pivot shift test in acute and chronic knee injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14:88–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim SJ, Kim SH, Kim SG, Kung YP. Comparison of the clinical results of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(Suppl 1):145–157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    LaPrade RF, Bernhardson AS, Griffith CJ, Macalena JA, Wijdicks CA. Correlation of valgus stress radiographs with medial knee ligament injuries: an in vitro biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:330–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    LaPrade RF, Heikes C, Bakker AJ, Jakobsen RB. The reproducibility and repeatability of varus stress radiographs in the assessment of isolated fibular collateral ligament and grade-III posterolateral knee injuries. An in vitro biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2069–2076.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    LaPrade RF, Terry GC. Injuries to the posterolateral aspect of the knee. Association of anatomic injury patterns with clinical instability. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:433–438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee YS, Han SH, Jo J, Kwak KS, Nha KW, Kim JH. Comparison of 5 different methods for measuring stress radiographs to improve reproducibility during the evaluation of knee instability. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1275–1281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lerat JL, Moyen B, Jenny JY, Perrier JP. A comparison of pre-operative evaluation of anterior knee laxity by dynamic X-rays and by the arthrometer KT 1000. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1:54–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lerat JL, Moyen BL, Cladière F, Besse JL, Abidi H. Knee instability after injury to the anterior cruciate ligament. Quantification of the Lachman test. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:42–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Margheritini F, Mancini L, Mauro CS, Mariani PP. Stress radiography for quantifying posterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:706–711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McPhee IB, Fraser JG. Stress radiography in acute ligamentous injuries of the knee. Injury. 1981;12:383–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Oberlander MA, Shalvoy RM, Hughston JC. The accuracy of the clinical knee examination documented by arthroscopy: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:773–778.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Panisset JC, Ntagiopoulos PG, Saggin PR, Dejour D. A comparison of Telos™ stress radiography versus Rolimeter™ in the diagnosis of different patterns of anterior cruciate ligament tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98:751–758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Peeler J, Leiter J, MacDonald P. Accuracy and reliability of anterior cruciate ligament clinical examination in a multidisciplinary sports medicine setting. Clin J Sports Med. 2010;20:80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Prins M. The Lachman test is the most sensitive and the pivot shift the most specific test for the diagnosis of ACL rupture. Aust J Physiother. 2006;52:66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rijke AM, Goitz HT, McCue FC 3rd, Delp JL, Lam D, Port Southall E. Graded stress radiography of injured anterior cruciate ligaments. Invest Radiol. 1991;26:926–933.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rijke AM, Tegtmeyer CJ, Weiland DJ, McCue FC 3rd. Stress examination of the cruciate ligaments: a radiologic Lachman test. Radiology. 1987;165:867–869.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rios CG, Leger RR, Cote MP, Yang C, Arciero RA. Posterolateral corner reconstruction of the knee: evaluation of a technique with clinical outcomes and stress radiography. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1564–1574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sawant M, Narasimha Murty A, Ireland J. Valgus knee injuries: evaluation and documentation using a simple technique of stress radiography. Knee. 2004;11:25–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schulz MS, Russe K, Lampakis G, Strobel MJ. Reliability of stress radiography for evaluation of posterior knee laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:502–506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schulz MS, Steenlage ES, Russe K, Strobel MJ. Distribution of posterior tibial displacement in knees with posterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:332–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sekiya JK, Whiddon DR, Zehms CT, Miller MD. A clinically relevant assessment of posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner injuries. Evaluation of isolated and combined deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1621–1627.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stäubli HU, Jakob RP. Posterior instability of the knee near extension. A clinical and stress radiographic analysis of acute injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:225–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stäubli HU, Jakob RP. Anterior knee motion analysis. Measurement and simultaneous radiography. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:172–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stäubli HU, Jakob RP, Noesberger B. Anterior-posterior knee instability and stress radiography a prospective biomechanical analysis with the knee in extension. Biomechanics: Current Interdisciplinary Research Developments in Biomechanics. 1985;2:397–402.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Stäubli HU, Noesberger B, Jakob RP. Stress radiography of the knee. Cruciate ligament function studied in 138 patients. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1992;249:1–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Torzilli PA, Greenberg RL, Hood RW, Pavlov H, Insall JN. Measurement of anterior-posterior motion of the knee in injured patients using a biomechanical stress technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:1438–1442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wagemakers HP, Luijsterburg PA, Boks SS, Heintjes EM, Berger MY, Verhaar JA, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Diagnostic accuracy of history taking and physical examination for assessing anterior cruciate ligament lesions of the knee in primary care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1452–1459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Dinnes J, Reitsma J, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:iii,1–234.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM; QUADAS-2 Group. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PN, Kleijnen J. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wiertsema SH, van Hooff HJ, Migchelsen LA, Steultjens MP. Reliability of the KT1000 arthrometer and the Lachman test in patients with an ACL rupture. Knee. 2008;15:107–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wirz P, von Stokar P, Jakob RP. The effect of knee position on the reproducibility of measurements taken from stress films: a comparison of four measurement methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8:143–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zaffagnini S, Bonanzinga T, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Giordano G, Bruni D, Bignozzi S, Lopomo N, Marcacci M. Does chronic medial collateral ligament laxity influence the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective evaluation with a minimum three-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1060–1064.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evan W. James
    • 1
  • Brady T. Williams
    • 2
  • Robert F. LaPrade
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Outcomes-based Orthopaedic ResearchSteadman Philippon Research InstituteVailUSA
  2. 2.Department of BioMedical EngineeringSteadman Philippon Research InstituteVailUSA
  3. 3.The Steadman ClinicVailUSA

Personalised recommendations