Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 471, Issue 12, pp 4012–4019 | Cite as

Unplanned Hip Arthroplasty Imposes Clinical and Cost Burdens on Treating Institutions

  • Atul F. Kamath
  • Daniel C. Austin
  • Peter B. Derman
  • Craig L. Israelite
Clinical Research



Emergent surgery has been shown to be a risk factor for perioperative complications. Studies suggest that patient morbidity is greater with an unplanned hip arthroplasty, although it is controversial whether unplanned procedures also result in higher patient mortality. The financial impact of these procedures is not fully understood, as the costs of unplanned primary hip arthroplasties have not been studied previously.


We asked: (1) What are the institutional costs associated with unplanned hip arthroplasties (primary THA, hemiarthroplasty, revision arthroplasty, including treatment of periprosthetic fractures, dislocations, and infections)? (2) Does timing of surgery (urgent/unplanned versus elective) influence perioperative outcomes such as mortality, length of stay, or need for advanced care? (3) What diagnoses are associated with unplanned surgery and are treated urgently most often? (4) Do demographics and insurance status differ between admission types (unplanned versus elective hip arthroplasty)?


We prospectively followed all 419 patients who were admitted to our Level I trauma center in 2011 for procedures including primary THA, hemiarthroplasty, and revision arthroplasty, including the treatment of periprosthetic fractures, dislocations, and infections. Fifty-seven patients who were treated urgently on an unplanned basis were compared with 362 patients who were treated electively. Demographics, admission diagnoses, complications, and costs were recorded and analyzed statistically.


Median total costs were 24% greater for patients admitted for unplanned hip arthroplasties (USD18,206 [USD15,261–27,491] versus USD14,644 [USD13,511–16,309]; p < 0.0001) for patients admitted for elective arthroplasties. Patients with unplanned admissions had a 67% longer median hospital stay (5 days [range, 4–9 days] versus 3 days [range, 3–4 days]; p < 0.0001) for patients with elective admissions. Mortality rates were equivalent between groups (p = 1.0). Femoral fracture (p < 0.0001), periprosthetic fracture (p = 0.01), prosthetic infection (p = 0.005), and prosthetic dislocation (p < 0.0001) were observed at higher rates in the patients with unplanned admissions. These patients were older (p = 0.04), less likely to have commercial insurance (p < 0.0001), more likely to be transferred from another institution (p < 0.0001), and more likely to undergo a revision procedure (p < 0.0001).


Unplanned arthroplasty and urgent surgery are associated with increased financial and clinical burdens, which must be accounted for when considering bundled quality and reimbursement measures for these procedures.

Level of Evidence

Level II, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


  1. 1.
    Archdeacon MT, Simon PM, Wyrick JD. The influence of insurance status on the transfer of femoral fracture patients to a level-I trauma center. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2625–2631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bohm ER, Dunbar MJ, Frood JJ, Johnson TM, Morris KA. Rehospitalizations, early revisions, infections, and hospital resource use in the first year after hip and knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:232–237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bottle A, Aylin P. Mortality associated with delay in operation after hip fracture: observational study. BMJ. 2006;332:947–951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bozic KJ, Lau E, Kurtz S, Ong K, Rubash H, Vail TP, Berry DJ. Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection and postoperative mortality following total hip arthroplasty in Medicare patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:794–800.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, Cauley JA, Genant HK, Mascioli SR, Scott JC, Seeley DG, Steiger P, Vogt TM. Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. JAMA. 1990;263:665–668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daugaard CL, Jorgensen HL, Riis T, Lauritzen JB, Duus BR, van der Mark S. Is mortality after hip fracture associated with surgical delay or admission during weekends and public holidays: a retrospective study of 38,020 patients? Acta Orthop. 2012;83:609–613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Donati A, Ruzzi M, Adrario E, Pelaia P, Coluzzi F, Gabbanelli V, Pietropaoli P. A new and feasible model for predicting operative risk. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93:393–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eagle KA, Brundage BH, Chaitman BR, Ewy GA, Fleisher LA, Hertzer NR, Leppo JA, Ryan T, Schlant RC, Spencer WH 3rd, Spittell JA Jr, Twiss RD, Ritchie JL, Cheitlin MD, Gardner TJ, Garson A Jr, Lewis RP, Gibbons RJ, O’Rourke RA, Ryan TJ. Guidelines for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery: report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Committee on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery. Circulation. 1996;93:1278–1317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fitz-Henry J. The ASA classification and peri-operative risk. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93:185–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, Southwick FS, Krogstad D, Murray B, Burke DS, O’Malley TA, Goroll AH, Caplan CH, Nolan J, Carabello B, Slater EE. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med. 1977;297:845–850.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kirksey M, Chiu YL, Ma Y, Della Valle AG, Poultsides L, Gerner P, Memtsoudis SG. Trends in in-hospital major morbidity and mortality after total joint arthroplasty: United States 1998–2008. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:321–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005–2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larsen SF, Olesen KH, Jacobsen E, Nielsen H, Nielsen AL, Pietersen A, Jensen OJ, Pedersen F, Waaben J, Kehlet H, Hansen JF, Dalgaard P, Nyboe J. Prediction of cardiac risk in non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J. 1987;8:179–185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu SS, Della Valle AG, Besculides M, Gaber LK, Memtsoudis SG. Trends in mortality, complications, and demographics for primary hip arthroplasty in the United States. Int Orthop. 2009;33:643–651.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lowry R. Concepts and Applications of Inferential Statistics. 2013. Available at: Accessed March 15, 2013.
  16. 16.
    Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Lew RA, Guadagnoli E, Harris WH, Poss R, Baron JA. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:27–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nathens AB, Maier RV, Copass MK, Jurkovich GJ. Payer status: the unspoken triage criterion. J Trauma. 2001;50:776–783.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ong KL, Mowat FS, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern MT, Kurtz SM. Economic burden of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in Medicare enrollees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:22–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Portney LG, Watkins MP. Appendix C: power analysis and determination of sample size. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Stamford, CT, USA: Appleton & Lange; 1993:651–667.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ. Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25:835–839.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 1941;2:281–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sams JD, Francis ML, Scaife SL, Robinson BS, Novicoff WM, Saleh KJ. Redefining revision total hip arthroplasty based on hospital admission status. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:758–763.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sams JD, Milbrandt JC, Froelich JM, Rainville AD, Allan DG. Hospital outcome after emergent vs elective revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:826–828.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shiga T, Wajima Z, Ohe Y. Is operative delay associated with increased mortality of hip fracture patients? Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55:146–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spain D, Bellino M, Kopelman A, Chang J, Park J, Gregg DL, Brundage SI. Requests for 692 transfers to an academic level I trauma center: implications of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. J Trauma. 2007;62:63–67; discussion 67–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tiret L, Hatton F, Desmonts JM, Vourc’h G. Prediction of outcome of anaesthesia in patients over 40 years: a multifactorial risk index. Stat Med. 1988;7:947–954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhan C, Kaczmarek R, Loyo-Berrios N, Sangl J, Bright RA. Incidence and short-term outcomes of primary and revision hip replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atul F. Kamath
    • 1
  • Daniel C. Austin
    • 2
  • Peter B. Derman
    • 3
  • Craig L. Israelite
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryUniversity of Pennsylvania, Penn Presbyterian Medical CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations