Incorporating Patient-reported Outcomes in Total Joint Arthroplasty Registries: Challenges and Opportunities
- 720 Downloads
Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) registries traditionally have focused on implant longevity and rates of revision surgery. Registries would benefit from the addition of standardized patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as pain relief and improved physical function. However, PROs have not been routinely adopted, and their incorporation into TJA registries presents challenges.
We review current PRO use by existing national registries, challenges to integrating PROs in national registries, lessons from national registries that have integrated PROs, and suggestions to guide future adoption of PROs.
We conducted a literature search of papers addressing PRO use in national knee and hip arthroplasty registries, resulting in 15 articles. These publications were supplemented by discussions with thought leaders from international registries.
Where Are We Now?
Some national TJA registries are collecting PROs and valuable research is emerging. However, challenges exist, such as selecting suitable PROs, selection bias in countries without government-mandated participation for all hospitals, and challenges with missing data.
Where Do We Need to Go?
The ideal system will incorporate PROs into TJA registries. In so doing, it will be important to choose suitable PROs and develop innovative methods to collect PROs to ensure complete data and sustainability.
How Do We Get There?
New methods are required to meet the challenges related to registry design, logistics of PRO collection, and registry cost and sustainability. Modifications to the traditional hospital- and implant-centric design and new procedures to collect complete data from both patients and clinicians may be necessary. For instance, England and Wales, New Zealand, and Sweden developed methods to collect PROs after TJA directly from patients and a US TJA registry collects PROs as the primary outcome. Finally, to assure long-term sustainability, PRO data must be valuable to multiple stakeholders, including patients, clinicians, researchers, and policy makers.
KeywordsElectronic Health Record Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Total Joint Arthroplasty Comparative Effectiveness Research Computerize Adaptive Testing
The authors acknowledge the broad team of investigators who have contributed to the design and implementation of the FORCE-TJR model, including Jeroan J. Allison MD, Wenjun Li PhD, Milagros C. Rosal PhD, Bruce Barton PhD, Sharina Person PhD, John E. Ware PhD, Courtland Lewis MD, Philip Noble PhD, Regis O’Keefe MD, PhD, and Vincent Pellegrini MD. In addition, FORCE-TJR is dependent on the ongoing collaboration of more than 100 surgeons who willingly allow enrollment of their patients. We also acknowledge Sylvie Puig PhD for her editorial contributions.
- 3.Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–1840.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2009 table, procedures by selected patient characteristics - number by procedure category and age. May 2012. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/insurg.htm. Accessed February 2013.
- 7.EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life: the EuroQol Group. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.Google Scholar
- 12.Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.Google Scholar
- 13.International Society of Arthroplasty Registries. Statements (revised February 2007). Available at: http://www.isarhome.org/statements. Accessed May 21, 2013.
- 14.Jameson SS, Baker PN, Mason J, Rymaszewska M, Gregg PJ, Deehan DJ, Reed MR. Independent predictors of failure up to 7.5 years after 35 386 single-brand cementless total hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. Bone Joint J. 2013;95:747–757.Google Scholar
- 16.New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. The New Zealand Joint Registry Thirteen Year Report: January 1999 to December 2011. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Orthopaedic Association; 2012.Google Scholar
- 23.Ware JE, Kosinski M, Bjomer JB, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B, Maruish ME. User’s Manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey. 2nd ed. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Inc; 2007.Google Scholar