Do Monoblock Cups Improve Survivorship, Decrease Wear, or Reduce Osteolysis in Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty?
- First Online:
- 583 Downloads
Monoblock acetabular components used in uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) have certain mechanical characteristics that potentially reduce acetabular osteolysis and polyethylene wear. However, the degree to which they achieve this goal is not well documented.
The purpose of this study was to use a systematic review of controlled trials to test the hypothesis that monoblock cups have superior (1) polyethylene wear rate; (2) frequency of cup migration; (3) frequency of acetabular osteolysis; and (4) frequency of aseptic loosening compared with modular components used in uncemented THA.
A systematic search was conducted in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases to assemble all controlled trials comparing monoblock with modular uncemented acetabular components in primary THA. Included studies were considered “best evidence” if the quality score was either ≥ 50% on the Cochrane Back Review Group checklist or ≥ 75% the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. A total of seven publications met our inclusion criteria.
Best evidence analysis showed no difference in polyethylene wear rate, the frequency of cup migration, and aseptic loosening between monoblock and modular acetabular components. No convincing evidence was found for the claim that lower frequencies of acetabular osteolysis are observed with the use of monoblock cups compared with modular uncemented cups.
The purported benefits of monoblock cups were not substantiated by this systematic review of controlled studies in that polyethylene wear rates and frequencies of cup failure and acetabular osteolysis were similar to those observed with modular implants. Other factors should therefore drive implant selection in cementless THA.
Level of Evidence
Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
- 1.Ali MS, Kumar A. Hydroxyapatite-coated RM cup in primary hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2003;2:90–93.Google Scholar
- 2.Australian National Joint Replacement Registry annual report 2011. Available at: http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/documents/AnnualReports2011/AnnualReport_2011_WebVersion.pdf. Accessed October 20, 2012.
- 6.Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M, Editorial Board, Cochrane Back Review Group. 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;18:1929–1941.Google Scholar
- 8.Gonzalez Della Valle A, Su E, Zoppi A, Sculco TP, Salvati EA. Wear and periprosthetic osteolysis in a match-paired study of modular and nonmodular uncemented acetabular cups. J Arthroplasty. 2004;8:972–977.Google Scholar
- 9.Gwynne-Jones DP, Garneti N, Wainwright C, Matheson JA, King R. The Morscher press fit acetabular component: a nine- to 13-year review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;7:859–864.Google Scholar
- 13.Huk OL, Bansal M, Betts F, Rimnac CM, Lieberman JR, Huo MH, Salvati EA. Polyethylene and metal debris generated by non-articulating surfaces of modular acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;4:568–574.Google Scholar
- 14.Ihle M, Mai S, Pfluger D, Siebert W. The results of the titanium-coated RM acetabular component at 20 years: a long-term follow-up of an uncemented primary total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;10:1284–1290.Google Scholar
- 15.Ihle M, Mai S, Siebert WE. Treatment for acetabular dysplasia using the uncemented RM acetabular component—a 20 year follow-up. Hip Int. 2010;1:94–101.Google Scholar
- 17.Krismer M, Fischer M, Mayrhofer P, Stockl F, Bittner C, Trojer C, Stockl B. A prospective study of the migration of two acetabular components. PCA versus RM cups. Int Orthop. 1994;1:23–28.Google Scholar
- 18.Krismer M, Stockl B, Fischer M, Bauer R, Mayrhofer P, Ogon M. Early migration predicts late aseptic failure of hip sockets. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;3:422–426.Google Scholar
- 20.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009:b2700.Google Scholar
- 22.Macheras GA, Kateros K, Koutsostathis SD, Tsakotos G, Galanakos S, Papadakis SA. The trabecular metal monoblock acetabular component in patients with high congenital hip dislocation: a prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;5:624–628.Google Scholar
- 24.Nagi ON, Kumar S, Aggarwal S. The uncemented isoelastic/isotitan total hip arthroplasty. A 10–15 years follow-up with bone mineral density evaluation. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006;1:55–64.Google Scholar
- 25.National Joint Registry of England and Wales annual report 2010. Available at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/portals/0/njr%207th%20annual%20report%202010.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2012.
- 29.Roffman M, Kligman M. Cementless coated and noncoated Mathys acetabular cups: radiographic and histologic evaluation. Orthopedics. 1999;1:39–41.Google Scholar
- 30.Rohrl SM, Nivbrant B, Strom H, Nilsson KG. Effect of augmented cup fixation on stability, wear, and osteolysis: a 5-year follow-up of total hip arthroplasty with RSA. J Arthroplasty. 2004;8:962–971.Google Scholar
- 32.Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;15:2008–2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register annual report 2010. Available at: http://www.shpr.se/Libraries/Documents/AnnualReport-2010-2-eng.sflb.ashx. Accessed November 1, 2012.
- 36.Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed October 20, 2012.
- 39.Young AM, Sychterz CJ, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA. Effect of acetabular modularity on polyethylene wear and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;1:58–63.Google Scholar