Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 471, Issue 10, pp 3262–3269 | Cite as

Long-term (20- to 25-year) Results of an Uncemented Tapered Titanium Femoral Component and Factors Affecting Survivorship

  • Marcus R. Streit
  • Moritz M. Innmann
  • Christian Merle
  • Thomas Bruckner
  • Peter R. Aldinger
  • Tobias Gotterbarm
Clinical Research



Uncemented femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) are commonly used today, but few studies have evaluated their survival into the third decade.


We evaluated (1) survivorship using femoral revision for any reason as the end point; (2) survivorship using femoral revision for aseptic loosening as the end point; and (3) patient-related and surgical risk factors for aseptic stem loosening at a minimum 20-year followup with an uncemented tapered titanium stem.


We reviewed the clinical and radiographic results of 354 THAs in 326 patients performed between January 1985 and December 1989 using an uncemented grit-blasted, tapered titanium femoral stem. Mean age at surgery was 57 years (range, 13–81 years). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was used to estimate long-term survival. Minimum followup evaluation was 20 years (mean, 22 years; range, 20–25 years); at that time, 120 patients (127 hips) had died, and four patients (five hips) were lost to followup. Multivariate survival analysis using a Cox regression model was performed.


Survivorship at 22 years with revision of the femoral component for any reason as the end point was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81%–90%). Survivorship for femoral revision for aseptic loosening as the end point was 93% at 22 years (95% CI, 90%–96%). Undersized stems (canal fill index ≤ 80%) and stems in hips with cup revision were at higher risk for aseptic loosening (hazard ratio, 4.2 and 4.3, respectively). There was a high rate of acetabular revision in this series (38%), mostly related to smooth-threaded, cementless sockets.


Uncemented femoral fixation was reliable into the third decade. Age, male sex, and diagnosis were not associated with a higher risk of aseptic loosening.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.



We thank Prof Dr Volker Ewerbeck for his inspiring mentorship and the help with interpretation of the data.


  1. 1.
    Al Muderis M, Bohling U, Grittner U, Gerdesmeyer L, Scholz J. Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the Spongiosa-I fully coated cancellous metal surface: a minimum twenty-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1039–1044.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aldinger PR, Breusch SJ, Lukoschek M, Mau H, Ewerbeck V, Thomsen M. A ten- to 15-year follow-up of the cementless spotorno stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:209–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aldinger PR, Jung AW, Breusch SJ, Ewerbeck V, Parsch D. Survival of the cementless Spotorno stem in the second decade. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2297–2304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S, Oberthaler W. The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1979;95:47–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belmont PJ Jr, Powers CC, Beykirch SE, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA Jr, Engh CA. Results of the anatomic medullary locking total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of twenty years. A concise follow-up of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1524–1530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:171–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biemond JE, Pakvis DF, van Hellemondt GG, Buma P. Long-term survivorship analysis of the cementless Spotorno femoral component in patients less than 50 years of age. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:386–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bourne RB, Corten K. Cemented versus cementless stems: a verdict is in. Orthopedics. 2010;33:638.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1629–1632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Callaghan JJ, Templeton JE, Liu SS, Pedersen DR, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:690–695.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clohisy JC, Harris WH. The Harris-Galante uncemented femoral component in primary total hip replacement at 10 years. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:915–917.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cook RE, Jenkins PJ, Walmsley PJ, Patton JT, Robinson CM. Risk factors for periprosthetic fractures of the hip: a survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1652–1656.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Corten K, Bourne RB, Charron KD, Au K, Rorabeck CH. What works best, a cemented or cementless primary total hip arthroplasty? Minimum 17-year followup of a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:209–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Witte PB, Brand R, Vermeer HG, van der Heide HJ, Barnaart AF. Mid-term results of total hip arthroplasty with the CementLess Spotorno (CLS) system. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1249–1255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Devane PA, Horne JG, Martin K, Coldham G, Krause B. Three-dimensional polyethylene wear of a press-fit titanium prosthesis. Factors influencing generation of polyethylene debris. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:256–266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dunbar MJ. Cemented femoral fixation: the North Atlantic divide. Orthopedics. 2009;32. pii: doi:  10.3928/01477447-20090728-07.
  17. 17.
    Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69:45–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ferrell MS, Browne JA, Attarian DE, Cook C, Bolognesi MP. Cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty at Duke: 18- to 24-year follow-up. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2009;18:150–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Rogmark C, Herberts P. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2010. Gothenburg, Sweden: Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register; 2011.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grappiolo G, Burastero G, Moraca G, Camera A, Santoro G, Gruen T, Spotorno L. The CLS stem in primary tha. long-term results and survivorship analysis of a tapered, grit-blasted, press-fit femoral prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. ‘Modes of failure’ of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:17–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Güther D, Pap G, Bamert P, Eggli S. [Long-term results with the cementless CLS stem in hip replacement] [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003;141:309–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Haddad RJ Jr, Skalley TC, Cook SD, Brinker MR, Cheramie J, Meyer R, Missry J. Clinical and roentgenographic evaluation of noncemented porous-coated anatomic medullary locking (AML) and porous-coated anatomic (PCA) total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;258:176–182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hailer NP, Garellick G, Karrholm J. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:34–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hallan G, Lie SA, Furnes O, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE, Havelin LI. Medium- and long-term performance of 11,516 uncemented primary femoral stems from the Norwegian arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1574–1580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hardoon SL, Lewsey JD, Gregg PJ, Reeves BC, van der Meulen JH. Continuous monitoring of the performance of hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:716–720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737–755.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hwang KT, Kim YH, Kim YS, Choi IY. Total hip arthroplasty using cementless grit-blasted femoral component: a minimum 10-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:1554–1561.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR, O’Connor DO, Haire T, Harris WH. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:551–558.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:500–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim YH. Long-term results of the cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:623–627.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kim YH, Kim JS, Park JW, Joo JH. Periacetabular osteolysis is the problem in contemporary total hip arthroplasty in young patients. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:74–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Laine HJ, Pajamaki KJ, Moilanen T, Lehto MU. The femoral canal fill of two different cementless stem designs. The accuracy of radiographs compared to computed tomographic scanning. Int Orthop. 2001;25:209–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ling R. The History and Development of the Exeter Hip. Rutherford, NJ, USA: Howmedica; 1997.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Mallory TH, Skeels MD, Adams JB. Survivorship of 2000 tapered titanium porous plasma-sprayed femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:146–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Loughead JM, O’Connor PA, Charron K, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Twenty-three-year outcome of the porous coated anatomic total hip replacement: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:151–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Martinez de Aragon JS, Keisu KS. 21-year results of the uncemented fully textured lord hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:133–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McLaughlin JR, Lee KR. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1290–1296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    McLaughlin JR, Lee KR. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty with a tapered femoral component: a 22- to 26-year follow-up study. Orthopedics. 2010;33:639.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    McLaughlin JR, Lee KR. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component in patients younger than 50 years. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:9–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Morshed S, Bozic KJ, Ries MD, Malchau H, Colford JM Jr. Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:315–326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mueller LA, Wenger N, Schramm M, Hohmann D, Forst R, Carl HD. Seventeen-year survival of the cementless CLS Spotorno stem. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Murray DW. Cemented femoral fixation: the North Atlantic divide. Orthopedics. 2011;34:e462–463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Valstar ER, Kaptein BL, Nelissen RG. Good diagnostic performance of early migration as a predictor of late aseptic loosening of acetabular cups: results from ten years of follow-up with Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:874–880.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rozkydal Z, Janicek P, Havlicek V, Pazourek L. [Long-term results of use of the CLS stem in primary total hip arthroplasty] [in Czech]. Acta Chir Orthop Trauma Cesh. 2009;76:281–287.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Saito S, Ishii T, Mori S, Hosaka K, Tokuhashi Y. The Harris-Galante cementless THA: a 19- to 25-year follow-up study. Orthopedics. 2011;34:12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schramm M, Keck F, Hohmann D, Pitto RP. Total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented femoral component with taper design: outcome at 10-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:407–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Siebold R, Scheller G, Schreiner U, Jani L. [Long-term results with the cement-free Spotorno CLS shaft] [in German]. Der Orthopade. 2001;30:317–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Spotorno L, Romagnoli S, Ivaldo N, Grappiolo G, Bibbiani E, Blaha DJ, Guen TA. The CLS system. Theoretical concept and results. Acta Orthop Belg. 1993;59(Suppl 1):144–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Streit MR, Merle C, Clarius M, Aldinger PR. Late peri-prosthetic femoral fracture as a major mode of failure in uncemented primary hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:178–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Streit MR, Schroder K, Korber M, Merle C, Gotterbarm T, Ewerbeck V, Aldinger PR. High survival in young patients using a second generation uncemented total hip replacement. Int Orthop. 2012;36:1129–1136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Taylor F, Wright M, Zhu M. Hemiarthroplasty of the hip with and without cement: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:577–583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Terre RA. Estimated survival probability of the Spotorno total hip arthroplasty after a 15- to 21-year follow-up: one surgeon’s results. Hip Int. 2010;20(Suppl 7):70–78.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vidalain JP. Twenty-year results of the cementless Corail stem. Int Orthop. 2011;35:189–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcus R. Streit
    • 1
  • Moritz M. Innmann
    • 1
  • Christian Merle
    • 1
  • Thomas Bruckner
    • 2
  • Peter R. Aldinger
    • 3
  • Tobias Gotterbarm
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Medical Biometry and InformaticsUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryOrthopädische Klinik PaulinenhilfeStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations