The Natural History of Inflammatory Pseudotumors in Asymptomatic Patients After Metal-on-metal Hip Arthroplasty
- 774 Downloads
Although pseudotumors have been reported in 32% of asymptomatic metal-on-metal hips, the natural history of asymptomatic pseudotumors is unknown.
The purpose of this study was to assess changes over time in asymptomatic pseudotumors and the effect of revision on pseudotumor mass.
Followup ultrasound was performed a mean of 25.8 months (range, 21–31 months) after the detection of 15 pseudotumors and five isolated fluid collections in a cohort of 20 asymptomatic patients (13 metal-on-metal, three metal-on-polyethylene, and four hip resurfacings) . Changes in pseudotumors and fluid collections size and nature, and serum ion levels were determined.
Among the 15 nonrevised patients, pseudotumors increased in size in six (four solid and two cystic) of 10 patients, three of which had clinically important increases (13–148 cm3; 28–74 cm3; 47–104 cm3). Three pseudotumors (one solid and two cystic) disappeared completely (the largest measured 31 cm3). One solid pseudotumor decreased in size (24 to 18 cm3). In five revised patients, pseudotumors completely disappeared in four patients. The fifth patient had two masses that decreased from 437 cm3 to 262 cm3 and 43 cm3 to 25 cm3. All revision patients had a reduction of chromium (40.42 μ/L to 2.69 μ/L) and cobalt ions (54.19 μ/L to 0.64 μ/L). Of five isolated fluid collections, four completely disappeared (two metal-on-metal and two metal-on-polyethylene) and one (metal-on-metal) increased from 26 cm3 to 136 cm3.
Our observations suggest pseudotumors frequently increase in size in asymptomatic patients with occasional remission of small masses. Revision resulted in remission of pseudotumors.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
We thank Diana Korlaet CRGS, PDDipAppSci (Medical Ultrasound), for performing the ultrasound scans; and Daphné Savoy BA, for her assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.
- 3.Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Available at: https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/documents/10180/60142/Annual%20Report%202012?version=1.2&t=1355186837517. Accessed January 5, 2013.
- 5.Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–1840.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Canadian Hip Resurfacing Study Group. A survey on the prevalence of pseudotumors with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in Canadian academic centers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(Suppl 2):118–121.Google Scholar
- 15.DePuy Synthes. Available at: http://www.depuy.com/sites/default/files/DPYUS1%20Recall%20Notice.pdf. Accessed July 2012.
- 16.Dowson D, Hardaker C, Flett M, Isaac GH. A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints. Part II: design. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(Suppl 3):124–130.Google Scholar
- 23.Hart AJ, Satchithananda K, Liddle AD, Sabah SA, McRobbie D, Henckel J, Cobb JP, Skinner JA, Mitchell AW. Pseudotumors in association with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip prostheses: a case-control study using three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:317–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Information for Orthopaedic Surgeons about Metal-on-Metal Hip Implant Surgery. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm241667.htm#top. Accessed July 2012.
- 28.Lavigne M, Ganapathi M, Mottard S, Girard J, Vendittoli PA. Range of motion of large head total hip arthroplasty is greater than 28 mm total hip arthroplasty or hip resurfacing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011;26:267–273.Google Scholar
- 33.National Joint Registry (NJR) for England and Wales. Available at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/NjrCentre/Portals/0/Documents/England/Reports/9th_annual_report/NJR%209th%20Annual%20Report%202012.pdf. Accessed January 5, 2013.
- 39.van der Weegen W, Smolders JM, Sijbesma T, Hoekstra HJ, Brakel K, van Susante JL. High incidence of pseudotumours after hip resurfacing even in low risk patients; results from an intensified MRI screening protocol. Hip Int. 2012 Dec 11. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000004 [Epub ahead of print].
- 43.Zimmer Inc. Available at: http://www.zimmer.com/web/enUS/pdf/DUROM_SURGEON_LETTER_07-22-08_FINAL1.pdf. Accessed July 2012.