Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 471, Issue 10, pp 3128–3132

Staphylococcus aureus Colonization among Arthroplasty Patients Previously Treated by a Decolonization Protocol: A Pilot Study

  • Demetri M. Economedes
  • Gregory K. Deirmengian
  • Carl A. Deirmengian
Symposium: 2012 Musculoskeletal Infection Society



Although testing and treatment for Staphylococcus aureus colonization before total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are well described and understood, the durability of decolonization has not been studied extensively.


The purpose of this pilot study is to determine the percentage of arthroplasty patients with S. aureus colonization despite previous decolonization at the time of TJA.


Over a 2-year period, all patients having TJA by one surgeon were screened and treated for nasal S. aureus. Of 634 patients, 139 had methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (15%) or methicillin-resistant S. aureus (6.6%) colonization before TJA. Fifty-eight of these 139 patients (42%) were retested at 3 to 30 months for persistent colonization by nasal culture. Data collection included age at time of TJA, type of TJA, and time from TJA to repeat testing. We performed no clonal analysis for strains.


Thirty-nine of the 58 patients (67%) decolonized before surgery were negative on retesting and 19 (33%) were again positive for S. aureus colonization. Of the 19 patients who retested positive for colonization, 17 (89%) were colonized by bacteria with unchanged antibiotic sensitivity.


We demonstrate that 33% (19 of 58) of postoperative arthroplasty patients test positive for S. aureus colonization at 3 to 30 months after surgery despite preoperative decolonization. Arthroplasty surgeons must be aware that a decolonization treatment does not guarantee that a patient will remain decolonized in the future. Although unchanged antibiotic sensitivity in 89% of these patients suggests a substantial role for persistence as opposed to eradication and repeat colonization, we were unable to retrospectively perform clonal analysis to confirm this conclusion. This group of patients demonstrating continued colonization with S. aureus after arthroplasty deserves further study, because it remains unclear whether there is a higher risk of late infection in this population.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


  1. 1.
    Armstrong-Esther CA, Smith JE. Carriage patterns of Staphylococcus aureus in a healthy non-hospital population of adults and children. Ann Hum Biol. 1976;3:221–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ayers DC, Dennis DA, Johanson NA, Pellegrini VD Jr. Common complications of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:278–311.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boucher H, Corey G. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(Suppl):S344–S349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyce JM. Should we try to contain and control methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991;12:46–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Datta R, Huang S. Risk of infection and death due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in long-term carriers. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:176–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dow G, Field D, Mancuso M, Allard J. Decolonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus during routine hospital care: efficacy and long-term follow-up. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2010;21:38–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fry DE. Surgical infections and the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP): evolution of the national quality measures. Surg Infect (Larchmnt). 2008;9:579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fulkerson E, Della Valle CJ, Wise B, Walsh M, Preston C, DiCesare PE. Antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria infecting total joint arthroplasty sites. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1231–1237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hacek D, Robb W, Paule S, Kudrna J, Stamos VP, Peterson LR. Staphylococcus aureus nasal decolonization in joint replacement surgery reduces infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1349–1355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang S, Platt R. Risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection after previous infection or colonization. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:281–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Immerman I, Ramos NL, Katz GM, Hutzler LH, Phillips MS, Bosco JA. The persistence of Staphylococcus aureus decolonization after mupirocin and topical chlorhexidine: implications for patients requiring multiple or delayed procedures. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:870–876.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kalmeijer M, Coertjens H, van Nieuwland-Bolland P, Bogaergs-Hofman D, deBaere GAJ, Stuurman A, van Belkum A, Kluytmans JAJW. Surgical site infection in orthopedic surgery: the effect of mupirocin nasal ointment in a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled study. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:353–358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim D, Spencer M, Davidson S, Li L, Shaw J, Gulczynski D, Hunter D, Martha J, Miley G, Parazin S, Dejoie P, Richmond J. Institutional prescreening for detection and eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1820–1826.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kluytmans J, van Belkum A, Verbrugh H. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms and associated risks. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:505–520.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lamikanra A, Paul BD, Akinwole OB, Paul MO. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in a population of healthy Nigerian students. J Med Microbiol. 1985;19:211–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee B, Wiringa A, Bailey R, Goyal V, Tsui B, Lewis GJ, Muder R, Harrison LM. The economic effect of screening orthopedic patients preoperatively for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:1130–1138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Lew RA, Guadagnoli E, Harris WH, Poss R, Baron JA. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:27–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meehan J, Jamali A, Nguyen H. Prophylactic antibiotics in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2480–2490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Odum S, Fehring T, Lombardi A, Zmistowski BM, Brown NM, Luna JT, Fehring KA, Hansen EN. Irrigation and débridement for periprosthetic infections—does the organism matter? J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(Suppl):114–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Perl T, Cullen J, Wenzel R, Zimmerman MB, Pfaller MA, Sheppard D, Twombley J, French PP, Herwaldt LA. Intranasal mupirocin to prevent postoperative Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1871–1877.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rao N, Cannella B, Crossett L, Yates AS, McGough R. A preoperative decolonization protocol for Staphylococcus aureus prevents orthopaedic infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1343–1348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Robicsek A, Beaumont J, Paule S, Hacek DM, Thomson RB, Kaul K, King P, Peterson LR. Universal surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 3 affiliated hospitals. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:409–418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wenzel RP, Perl TM. The significance of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and the incidence of post operative wound infection. J Hosp Infect. 1995;31:13–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Williams R. Healthy carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: its prevalence and importance. Bacteriol Rev. 1963;27:56–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Demetri M. Economedes
    • 1
  • Gregory K. Deirmengian
    • 2
  • Carl A. Deirmengian
    • 2
  1. 1.Rush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Rothman InstitutePhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations