Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 471, Issue 7, pp 2183–2191

Postoperative Improvement of Femoroacetabular Impingement After Intertrochanteric Flexion Osteotomy for SCFE

  • Takashi Saisu
  • Makoto Kamegaya
  • Yuko Segawa
  • Jun Kakizaki
  • Kazuhisa Takahashi
Symposium: Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Update and Emerging Concepts

Abstract

Background

Patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) may develop cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Early management of FAI has been advocated for patients with symptomatic FAI. The various treatment options, including reorientation surgeries, realignment procedures, and osteoplasty, remain controversial.

Questions/purposes

We asked whether an intertrochanteric flexion osteotomy improved the clinical symptoms of FAI in patients with SCFE and confirmed whether the radiographic signs were compatible with the clinical signs of FAI.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 32 symptomatic patients who underwent 32 intertrochanteric flexion osteotomies for severe SCFE. FAI was diagnosed clinically with a positive impingement sign. The osteotomies were designed preoperatively using CT. Cam-type FAI was evaluated with the modified α angle (β angle) on a Lauenstein view, measured between the proximal femoral shaft axis and the line from the center of the femoral head to the anterior point where the distance of the head center exceeded the femoral head radius. The minimum followup was 2 years (mean, 5 years; range, 2–9 years).

Results

At last followup, only two patients complained of pain or inconvenience in daily life; the impingement sign was negative in 24 hips (75%). The β angles at last followup were reduced on average by 39°. The postoperative β angle was higher in hips with positive clinical signs of FAI than in those with negative signs.

Conclusions

Intertrochanteric flexion osteotomy for SCFE improved the clinical and radiographic signs of FAI. The β angle and clinical findings showed compatible improvement. We believe our intertrochanteric flexion osteotomy is a viable option for treating severe SCFE.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

References

  1. 1.
    Boyer DW, Mickelson MR, Ponseti IV. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: long-term follow-up study of one hundred and twenty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:85–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burnett RS, Della Rocca GJ, Prather H, Curry M, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC. Clinical presentation of patients with tears of the acetabular labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1448–1457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carney BT, Weinstein SL, Noble J. Long-term follow-up of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:667–674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diab M, Daluvoy S, Snyder BD, Kasser JR. Osteotomy does not improve early outcome after slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2006;15:87–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drehmann F. [Drehmann’s sign. A clinical examination method in epiphysiolysis (slipping of the upper femoral epiphysis): description of signs, aetiopathogenetic considerations, clinical experience (author’s transl)] [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1979;117:333–344.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    El-Mowafi H, El-Adl G, El-Lakkany MR. Extracapsular base of neck osteotomy versus Southwick osteotomy in treatment of moderate to severe chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:171–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fraitzl CR, Käfer W, Nelitz M, Reichel H. Radiological evidence of femoroacetabular impingement in mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a mean follow-up of 14.4 years after pinning in situ. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1592–1596.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fujii M, Nakashima Y, Noguchi Y, Yamamoto T, Mawatari T, Motomura G, Iwamoto Y. Effect of intra-articular lesions on the outcome of periacetabular osteotomy in patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1449–1456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goodman DA, Feighan JE, Smith AD, Latimer B, Buly RL, Cooperman DR. Subclinical slipped capital femoral epiphysis: relationship to osteoarthrosis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1489–1497. Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:592.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Imhäuser G. [Late results of Imhäuser’s osteotomy for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (author’s transl)] [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1977;115:716–725.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jerre R, Hansson G, Wallin J, Karlsson J. Long-term results after realignment operations for slipped upper femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:745–750.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones JR, Paterson DC, Hillier TM, Foster BK. Remodelling after pinning for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:568–573.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kamegaya M, Saisu T, Nakamura J, Murakami R, Segawa Y, Wakou M. Drehmann sign and femoro-acetabular impingement in SCFE. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31:853–857.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kamegaya M, Saisu T, Ochiai N, Moriya H. Preoperative assessment for intertrochanteric femoral osteotomies in severe chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis using computed tomography. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005;14:71–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16:494–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kuzyk PR, Kim YJ, Millis MB. Surgical management of healed slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:667–677.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leunig M, Casillas MM, Hamlet M, Hersche O, Nötzli H, Slongo T, Ganz R. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: early mechanical damage to the acetabular cartilage by a prominent femoral metaphysis. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:370–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leunig M, Horowitz K, Manner H, Ganz R. In situ pinning with arthroscopic osteoplasty for mild SCFE: a preliminary technical report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:3160–3167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loder RT, Richards BS, Shapiro PS, Reznick LR, Aronson DD. Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the importance of physeal stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1134–1140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mamisch TC, Kim YJ, Richolt J, Zilkens C, Kikinis R, Millis M, Kordelle J. Range of motion after computed tomography-based simulation of intertrochanteric corrective osteotomy in cases of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: comparison of uniplanar flexion osteotomy and multiplanar flexion, valgisation, and rotational osteotomies. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29:336–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Millis MB, Novais EN. In situ fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis: perspectives in 2011. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93 (suppl 2):46–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:556–560.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parsch K, Weller S, Parsch D. Open reduction and smooth Kirschner wire fixation for unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29:1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Slongo T, Kakaty D, Krause F, Ziebarth K. Treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis with a modified Dunn procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2898–2908.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Southwick WO. Osteotomy through the lesser trochanter for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967;49:807–835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ziebarth K, Zilkens C, Spencer S, Leunig M, Ganz R, Kim YJ. Capital realignment for moderate and severe SCFE using a modified Dunn procedure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:704–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zilkens C, Bittersohl B, Jäger M, Miese F, Schultz J, Kircher J, Westhoff B, Krauspe R. Significance of clinical and radiographic findings in young adults after slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Int Orthop. 2011;35:1295–1301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takashi Saisu
    • 1
  • Makoto Kamegaya
    • 2
  • Yuko Segawa
    • 1
  • Jun Kakizaki
    • 1
  • Kazuhisa Takahashi
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Orthopaedic SurgeryChiba Children’s HospitalChibaJapan
  2. 2.Chiba Child and Adult Orthopaedic ClinicChibaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryGraduate School of Medicine, Chiba UniversityChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations