Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 471, Issue 7, pp 2151–2155 | Cite as

Increased Acetabular Depth May Influence Physeal Stability in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

  • David A. Podeszwa
  • David Gurd
  • Anthony Riccio
  • Adriana De La Rocha
  • Daniel J. Sucato
Symposium: Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Update and Emerging Concepts



Multiple mechanical factors affecting the hip have been associated with the development of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Whether acetabular depth plays a role in the development of a SCFE has not been elucidated.


(1) What is the prevalence of a deep acetabulum in SCFE? (2) Is the presence of a deep acetabulum associated with physeal instability? (3) Is the presence of a deep acetabulum associated with the occurrence of a contralateral SCFE?


We retrospectively reviewed 232 patients (156 males) who presented with a unilateral SCFE. Fifty (22%) subsequently developed a contralateral SCFE. The involved and uninvolved sides were evaluated for the presence of a deep acetabulum (DA). Preoperative radiographic parameters, slip stability, development of a contralateral SCFE, and demographic factors were then compared between patients with and without DA.


DA was present in 120 hips (52%) with a SCFE. DA was more common in females (55 of 76 [72%]) than males (65 of 156 [42%]). Patients with DA presented with a higher lateral center-edge angle (33° versus 31°), slip angle (52° versus 43°), and with a lower body mass index (28.1 versus 30.0 kg/m2). Increased acetabular depth was more common in patients with an unstable SCFE (29 of 41 [71%]) than those with a stable SCFE (91 of 191 [48%]). The presence of DA either on the affected side or the contralateral side did not predict a contralateral SCFE.


Despite not predicting a contralateral SCFE, DA may influence physeal stability if a SCFE does develop. Therefore, the contralateral hip with DA should be closely monitored.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


  1. 1.
    Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1012–1018.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck M, Leunig M, Parvizi J, Boutier V, Wyss D, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:67–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhatia NN, Pirpiris M, Otsuka NY. Body mass index in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26:197–199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chung SM, Batterman SC, Brighton CT. Shear strength of the human femoral capital epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:94–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaule PE, Kim YJ, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, Leunig M, Schoenecker PL, Millis MB. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 4):47–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crowninshield RD, Brand RA, Pedersen DR. A stress analysis of acetabular reconstruction in protrusio acetabuli. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:495–499.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gelberman RH, Cohen MS, Shaw BA, Kasser JR, Griffin PP, Wilkinson RH. The association of femoral retroversion with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1000–1007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Palm H, Troelsen A. Prevalence of malformations of the hip joint and their relationship to sex, groin pain, and risk of osteoarthritis: a population-based survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1162–1169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gusis SE, Babini JC, Garay SM, Garcia Morteo O, Maldonado Cocco JA. Evaluation of the measurement methods for protrusio acetabuli in normal children. Skeletal Radiol. 1990;19:279–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hagglund G, Hansson LI, Ordeberg G, Sandstrom S. Bilaterality in slipped upper femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:179–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hastings DE, Parker SM. Protrusio acetabuli in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;108:76–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kallio PE, Mah ET, Foster BK, Paterson DC, LeQuesne GW. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Incidence and clinical assessment of physeal instability. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:752–755.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kennedy JG, Hresko MT, Kasser JR, Shrock KB, Zurakowski D, Waters PM, Millis MB. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head associated with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21:189–193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kitadai HK, Milani C, Nery CA, Filho JL. Wiberg’s center-edge angle in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;19:97–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kordelle J, Richolt JA, Millis M, Jolesz FA, Kikinis R. Development of the acetabulum in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a three-dimensional analysis based on computed tomography. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21:174–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leunig M, Nho SJ, Turchetto L, Ganz R. Protrusio acetabuli: new insights and experience with joint preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2241–2250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Loder RT, Aronson DD, Greenfield ML. The epidemiology of bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis. A study of children in Michigan. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1141–1147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loder RT, Hensinger RN. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis associated with renal failure osteodystrophy. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:205–211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loder RT, Richards BS, Shapiro PS, Reznick LR, Aronson DD. Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the importance of physeal stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1134–1140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loder RT, Wittenberg B, DeSilva G. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis associated with endocrine disorders. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15:349–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Manoff EM, Banffy MB, Winell JJ. Relationship between body mass index and slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:744–746.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maquet P. Biomechanics of the Hip. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mirkopulos N, Weiner DS, Askew M. The evolving slope of the proximal femoral growth plate relationship to slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988;8:268–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park S, Hsu JE, Rendon N, Wolfgruber H, Wells L. Predicting a contralateral slip after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis: is the posterior sloping angle useful? UPOJ. 2010;20:106–112.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Poussa M, Schlenzka D, Yrjonen T. Body mass index and slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2003;12:369–371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rattey T, Piehl F, Wright JG. Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Review of outcomes and rates of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:398–402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sankar WN, Brighton BK, Kim Y-J, Millis MB. Acetabular morphology in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31:254–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Southwick WO. Osteotomy through the lesser trochanter for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967;49:807–835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stanitski CL, Woo R, Stanitski DF. Femoral version in acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996;5:74–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Steel HH. Protrusio acetabuli: its occurrence in the completely expressed Marfan syndrome and its musculoskeletal component and a procedure to arrest the course of protrusion in the growing pelvis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1996;16:704–718.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tannast M, Goricki D, Beck M, Murphy SB, Siebenrock KA. Hip damage occurs at the zone of femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:273–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis—what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1540–1552.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wenger DR, Ditkoff TJ, Herring JA, Mauldin DM. Protrusio acetabuli in Marfan’s syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;147:134–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wiberg G. Studies in dysplastic acetabulum and congenital subluxation of the hip joint with special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand. 1939;83:S58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Podeszwa
    • 1
  • David Gurd
    • 2
  • Anthony Riccio
    • 1
  • Adriana De La Rocha
    • 1
  • Daniel J. Sucato
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryTexas Scottish Rite Hospital for ChildrenDallasUSA
  2. 2.Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations