Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 471, Issue 7, pp 2318–2326

Osteonecrosis Complicating Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Compromises Subsequent Acetabular Remodeling

  • Andreas Roposch
  • Deborah Ridout
  • Evangelia Protopapa
  • Nicholas Nicolaou
  • Yael Gelfer
Clinical Research Pediatrics

Abstract

Background

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head secondary to treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) affects acetabular remodeling but the magnitude of this effect is unclear.

Questions/purposes

Using four measures of acetabular development, we (1) determined whether acetabular remodeling differed in hips with and without osteonecrosis; and (2) determined the impact of severity of osteonecrosis contributing to acetabular remodeling.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 95 patients (118 hips) treated for DDH by closed or open reduction with or without femoral osteotomy between 1992 and 2006. We evaluated serial radiographs from the time when a stable reduction had been achieved. In 902 radiographs taken over 19 years, we measured the acetabular index and three other indices of hip development. Patients were followed for a mean of 8 years (range, 1–19 years). At last followup, 86 of the 118 hips (73%) had osteonecrosis according to the criteria by Bucholz and Ogden.

Results

The acetabular index improved with time in all hips but the magnitude of improvement was larger in hips without osteonecrosis. The adjusted mean acetabular index at 14 years was 17° for hips with osteonecrosis (95% CI, 15°–18°) and 10° for hips without osteonecrosis (95% CI, 7°–13°). The lateral centering ratio improved after reduction to a normal value less than 0.85 in both groups but the rate of change with 0.06 versus 0.05 was higher in hips with osteonecrosis. The superior centering ratio was worse at all times in hips with osteonecrosis with a mean difference of 0.04. If only radiographic changes of Grades II and greater were considered osteonecrosis, the mean adjusted acetabular index at 14 years was 17.7° (15.6°–19.7°) for hips with osteonecrosis and 12.4° (10.3°–14.4°) for hips without osteonecrosis.

Conclusions

Although radiographic indices improved consistently with time in hips without osteonecrosis, hips with osteonecrosis had abnormal indices of acetabular remodeling throughout followup. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head inhibited acetabular remodeling.

Level of Evidence

Level III, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

References

  1. 1.
    Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. 1974;19:716–723.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albinana J, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, Morcuende J, Meyer MD, Weinstein SL. Acetabular dysplasia after treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:876–886.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atsumi T, Kuroki Y. Role of impairment of blood supply of the femoral head in the pathogenesis of idiopathic osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;277:22–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bar-On E, Huo MH, DeLuca PA. Early innominate osteotomy as a treatment for avascular necrosis complicating developmental hip dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1997;6:138–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brougham DI, Broughton NS, Cole WG, Menelaus MB. The predictability of acetabular development after closed reduction for congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:733–736.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brougham DI, Broughton NS, Cole WG, Menelaus MB. Avascular necrosis following closed reduction of congenital dislocation of the hip: review of influencing factors and long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:557–562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bucholz RW, Ogden JA. Patterns of ischemic necrosis of the proximal femur in nonoperatively treated congenital hip disease. The Hip: Proceedings of the Sixth Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1978:43–63.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cooperman DR, Wallensten R, Stulberg SD. Post-reduction avascular necrosis in congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:247–258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooperman DR, Wallensten R, Stulberg SD. Acetabular dysplasia in the adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;175:79–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harris NH, Lloyd-Roberts GC, Gallien R. Acetabular development in congenital dislocation of the hip: with special reference to the indications for acetabuloplasty and pelvic or femoral realignment osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975;57:46–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lindstrom JR, Ponseti IV, Wenger DR. Acetabular development after reduction in congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:112–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Malvitz TA, Weinstein SL. Closed reduction for congenital dysplasia of the hip: functional and radiographic results after an average of thirty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:1777–1792.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morcuende J, Meyer MD, Dolan LA, Weinstein SL. Long-term outcome after open reduction through an anteromedial approach for congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79;810–817.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakamura J, Kamegaya M, Saisu T, Someya M, Koizumi W, Moriya H. Treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip using the Pavlik harness: long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:230–235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roposch A, Liu LQ, Offiah A, Wedge JH. Functional outcomes in children with osteonecrosis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:e145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roposch A, Stohr KK, Dobson M. The effect of the femoral head ossific nucleus in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:911–918.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Royston P, Ambler G, Sauerbrei W. The use of fractional polynomials to model continuous risk variables in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:964–974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharp IK. Acetabular dysplasia: the acetabular angle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43:268–272.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sibinski M, Synder M, Pruszczynski B. [Hip joint development after closed reduction complicated by growth disturbance of the capital femoral epiphysis][in Polish]. Chir Nazardow Ruchu Orto Pol. 2006;71:33–36.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Skaggs DL, Kaminsky C, Tolo VT, Kay RM, Reynolds RA. Variability in measurement of acetabular index in normal and dysplastic hips, before and after reduction. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:799–801.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spence G, Hocking R, Wedge JH, Roposch A. Effect of innominate and femoral varus derotation osteotomy on acetabular development in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2622–2636.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tönnis D. Normal values of the hip joint for evaluation of x-rays in children and adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;119:39–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tönnis D. Congenital Dysplasia and Dislocation of the Hip in Children and Adults. 1st ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ucar DH, Isiklar ZU, Stanitski CL, Kandemir U, Tumer Y. Open reduction through a medial approach in developmental dislocation of the hip: a follow-up study to skeletal maturity. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24:493–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011;30:377–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:1049–1060.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Roposch
    • 1
    • 2
  • Deborah Ridout
    • 1
  • Evangelia Protopapa
    • 1
  • Nicholas Nicolaou
    • 2
  • Yael Gelfer
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryGreat Ormond Street Hospital for ChildrenLondonUK

Personalised recommendations