Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 471, Issue 7, pp 2078–2082 | Cite as

Severe Metal-induced Osteolysis Many Years After Unipolar Hip Endoprosthesis

Case Report



Modularity of the femoral head-neck junction provides increased intraoperative flexibility to the surgeon. Complications of this modularity include damage to the trunnion, with subsequent bone and/or soft tissue loss from adverse reactions to metal debris.

Case Description

We describe two cases of severe metal-induced osteolysis and soft tissue damage requiring revision 10 and 13 years following implantation of a unipolar endoprosthesis. Damage to the trunnion resulted in severe acetabular and trochanteric osteolysis and soft tissue loss requiring complex revision surgery.

Literature Review

Several reports have shown the trunnion, the head-neck interface, and the neck-stem couple as the causes of this early failure secondary to metal ion release from mechanical fretting corrosion or from crevice corrosion at these modular interfaces. These reports have been in association with a total hip prosthesis rather than a unipolar endoprosthesis. Revision of a unipolar endoprosthesis is most commonly attributable to stem loosening or acetabular erosion from the large femoral head articulating on the host acetabular cartilage and not owing to failure of the trunnion.

Purposes and Clinical Relevance

Trunnion damage resulting in a severe reaction to metal debris with acetabular osteolysis, erosion of the greater trochanter, and loss of the abductor mechanism can occur years after implantation of a cementless unipolar endoprosthesis. This raises questions regarding long-term safety of the modular interface of a contemporary cementless stem and a large-diameter unipolar head. We recommend long-term followup of patients with a unipolar endoprosthesis as early recognition and treatment are required to avoid a potentially complex revision.


  1. 1.
    Andersson G, Nielsen JM. Results after arthroplasty of the hip with Moore’s prosthesis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1972;43:397–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atwood SA, Patten EW, Bozic KJ, Pruitt LA, Ries MD. Corrosion-induced fracture of a double-modular hip prosthesis: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1522–1525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolland BJ, Culliford DJ, Langton DJ, Millington JP, Arden NK, Latham JM. High failure rates with a large-diameter hybrid metal-on-metal total hip replacement: clinical, radiological and retrieval analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:608–615.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Botti TP, Gent J, Martell JM, Manning DW. Trunion fracture of a fully porous-coated femoral stem: case report. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:943–945.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown SA, Flemming CA, Kawalec JS, Placko HE, Vassaux C, Merritt K, Payer JH, Kraay MJ. Fretting corrosion accelerates crevice corrosion of modular hip tapers. J Appl Biomater. 1995;6:19–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collier JP, Surprenant VA, Jensen RE, Mayor MB. Corrosion at the interface of cobalt-alloy heads on titanium-alloy stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;271:305–312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Collier JP, Surprenant VA, Jensen RE, Mayor MB, Surprenant HP. Corrosion between the components of modular femoral hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:511–517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cook SD, Barrack RL, Clemow AJ. Corrosion and wear at the modular interface of uncemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:68–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooper HJ, Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Tetreault M, Paprosky WG, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ. Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1655–1661.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cossey AJ, Goodwin MI. Failure of Austin Moore hemiarthroplasty: total hip replacement as a treatment strategy. Injury. 2002;33:19–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP. The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trail. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:318–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gilbert JL, Buckley CA, Jacobs JJ. In vivo corrosion of modular hip prosthesis components in mixed and similar metal combinations: the effect of crevice, stress, motion, and alloy coupling. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27:1533–1544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gilbert JL, Buckley CA, Jacobs JJ, Bertin KC, Zernich MR. Intergranular corrosion-fatigue failure of cobalt-alloy femoral stems: a failure analysis of two impants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:110–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gilbert JL, Mehta M, Pinder B. Fretting crevice corrosion of stainless steel stem-CoCr femoral head connections: comparisons of materials, initial moistrure, and offset length. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;88:162–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL. In vitro corrosion testing of modular hip tapers. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;64:78–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL, Jacobs JJ, Bauer TW, Paprosky W, Leurgans S. A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;401:149–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaltsas DS, Klugman DJ. Acetabular erosion: a comparison between the Austin Moore and Monk hard top prostheses. Injury. 1986;17:230–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kop AM, Swarts E. Corrosion of a hip stem with a modular neck taper junction: a retrieval study of 16 cases. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:1019–1023.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lam LO, Stoffel K, Kop A, Swarts E. Catastrophic failure of 4 cobalt-alloy Omnifit hip arthroplasty femoral components. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:18–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Gandhi JN, Sidaginamale R, Mereddy P, Lord J, Nargol AV. Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1011–1016.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Hallab NJ, Natu S, Nargol AV. Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:38–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lewis G. Geometric element analysis of fretting in a model of a modular femoral component of a hip implant. Biomed Mater Eng. 2004;14:43–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lieberman JR, Rimnac CM, Garvin KL, Klein RW, Salvati EA. An analysis of the head-neck taper interface in retrieved hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;300:162–167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Phillips TW. Thompson hemiarthroplasty and acetabular erosion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:913–917.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shareef N, Levine D. Effect of manufacturing tolerances on the micromotion at the Morse taper interface in modular hip implants using the finite element technique. Biomaterials. 1996;17:623–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Soreide O, Lillestol J, Aiho A, Hvidsten K. Acetabular protrusion following endoprostetic hip surgery: a multifactorial study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980;51:943–948.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Warwick D, Hubble M, Sarris I, Strange J. Revision of failed hemiarthroplasty for fractures at the hip. Int Orthop. 1998;22:165–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wright G, Sporer S, Urban R, Jacobs J. Fracture of a modular femoral neck after total hip arthroplasty: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1518–1521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew A. Mann
    • 1
  • Dylan Tanzer
    • 3
  • Michael Tanzer
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Orthopaedic SurgeryMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.McGill University Health CentreMontrealCanada
  3. 3.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations