Locking Buttons Increase Fatigue Life of Locking Plates in a Segmental Bone Defect Model
- 491 Downloads
Durability of plate fixation is important in delayed union. Although locking plates result in stronger constructs, it is not known if locking affects the fatigue life of a plate. Two locking screws on either side of the nonunion could decrease working length and increase strain in the plate. However, the reinforcing effect of the locking head on the plate may compensate, so that it is unclear whether locking reduces fatigue life.
We determined whether locking screws, compression screws, and locking buttons reduce or increase the fatigue life of a plate.
We tested fatigue life of four constructs using an eight-hole locking plate in a segmental defect model: (1) all locking screws (Locked; n = 5); (2) all compression screws (Unlocked; n = 5); (3) six compression screws with two locking buttons in the central holes (Button; n = 6); and (4) six compression screws with two open central holes (Open; n = 6).
The Button group had the longest fatigue life (1.3 million cycles). There was no difference between the Locked and Unlocked groups. All of the constructs failed by fracture of the plates through a screw hole adjacent to the defect.
Locking screws did not improve fatigue life, however a locking button increased the fatigue life of a locking plate in a segmental bone defect model.
Locking buttons in holes adjacent to a defect may improve durability, which is important when delayed union is a possibility.
We thank Allison Biercevicz BS and Ryan Rich for assistance with testing the samples.
- 19.Hertel R, Eijer H, Meisser A, Hauke C, Perren SM. Biomechanical and biological considerations relating to the clinical use of the Point Contact-Fixator: evaluation of the device handling test in the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the radius and/or ulna. Injury. 2001;32(suppl 2):B10–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Hoffmeier KL, Hofmann GO, Muckley T. Choosing a proper working length can improve the lifespan of locked plates: a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011;26:405–409.Google Scholar
- 23.Kaiser MM, Wessel LM, Zachert G, Stratmann C, Eggert R, Gros N, Schulze-Hessing M, Kienast B, Rapp M. Biomechanical analysis of a synthetic femur spiral fracture model: influence of different materials on the stiffness in flexible intramedullary nailing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011;26:592–597.Google Scholar
- 31.Seide K, Triebe J, Faschingbauer M, Schulz AP, Puschel K, Mehrtens G, Jurgens Ch. Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus: a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007;22:176–182.Google Scholar
- 40.Vander Griend RA. The effect of internal fixation on the healing of large allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:657–663.Google Scholar
- 41.Walsh S, Reindl R, Harvey E, Berry G, Beckman L, Steffen T. Biomechanical comparison of a unique locking plate versus a standard plate for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in a cadaveric model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21:1027–1031.Google Scholar