The 2012 John Charnley Award: Clinical Multicenter Studies of the Wear Performance of Highly Crosslinked Remelted Polyethylene in THA
Highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) in THA was developed to reduce particle-induced periprosthetic osteolysis. A series of clinical studies were initiated to determine the clinical efficacy as judged by patient-reported scores, radiographic osteolysis, and wear analysis of one form of HXLPE.
The purposes of this series of studies were to (1) determine the wear rates of one form of HXLPE; (2) report long-term (7–10 years) patient-reported outcome measures; (3) assess the effect of femoral head size on wear; and (4) determine the incidence of periprosthetic osteolysis.
A single-center and two multicenter studies were conducted on 768 primary patients (head size 26–36 mm) undergoing THA at eight medical centers. Patient-reported outcome scores, radiographic grading for osteolysis, and radiographic wear evaluation were performed.
Serial plain radiographs showed no periprosthetic osteolysis in the three studies. The average femoral head penetration rates did not correlate with time in vivo for patients with standard femoral head sizes. Although there was an indication of higher wear in patients with 36-mm diameter femoral heads, it was below the threshold for producing osteolysis.
The introduction of this HXLPE substantially improved the prognosis of patients after THA up to 13 years as judged by clinical scores, incidence of osteolysis, and polyethylene wear measurements.
Level of Evidence
Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guideline for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
KeywordsFemoral Head Wear Rate Head Size Volumetric Wear Periprosthetic Osteolysis
We thank Christopher Barr for his assistance in data analysis and data presentation assistance.
- 20.Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J, Malchau H, Herberts P. The Otto Aufranc Award. Highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: randomized evaluation of penetration rate in cemented and uncemented sockets using radiostereometric analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:6–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Jasty M, Harris W. Periprosthetic osteolysis. In: Stauffer RS, Ehrlich MG, Fu FH, Kostuik JP, Manske PR, Sim FH, eds. Advances in Operative Orthopaedics. Vol 1. Boston, MA, USA: Mosby Year Book, Inc; 1993:1–22.Google Scholar
- 30.Karrholm J, Digas G, Thanner J, Herberts P. Five to 7 years experiences with highly cross-linked PE. SICOT TWC Abstract #19059. Hong Kong; 2008. Available at: http://www.sicot.org/. Accessed December 19, 2011.
- 31.Kind PH, Macran S. UK Population Norms for EQ-5D. York, UK: The University of York Centre for Health Economics; 1999.Google Scholar
- 48.Shahrdar C. Pseudotumor in large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip articulation. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:665.e21–23.Google Scholar
- 51.Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Herkowitz H, Fischgrund J, Cammisa FP, Albert T, Deyo RA. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA. 2006;296:2451–2459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Wroblewski BM. Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty of the hip. In: Faux JC, ed. After Charnley. Preston, UK: The John Charnley Trust; 2002:29–35.Google Scholar